#17 pick 3 options you want

[rikardo]

1. DT (Vea or Payne)
2. S (Minkah or James)
3 QB. Jackson

[Fleet]

1. Evans
2. James
3. Payne or Hurst

The way he just flies through gaps...seems to know where the ball carrier is going before he cuts...and he is so fast to get after a qb on the move. With qbs being more mobile i just think this guy can really help us in all 3 phases. Run, pass and pass rush. Plays like a Safety. His speed stands out on film. And his film is fun to watch. I love this kid. These are really justa few highlights.

[bonehead]

1. S. James

2. LB. Evans

3. DT. Hurst

[foreigner]

We need more production from our LB's
imagen.png

[Steve]

Their tackle production is in line with the number of plays they got. As far as big plays go, if you don't blitz the LB (and we don't) there is just about zero chance of the LB getting sacks. We no longer blitz our LB and .... suprise ..... they don't make any sacks. Bradley's D is always among one of the lowest blitz percentages in the league, so that isn't going to change.

[blueman]

Betcha we get better LBs they play more. Even blitz the QB.

[Steve]

Seattle had the best LB corp in the NFL when Bradley left and still blitzed a lot less than every other team. It's not how he is wired. And they didn't have the pass rushers we do.

If we want to blitz, Brown is an excellent choice to turn loose. His lack of production is because we didn't turn him loose.

[Formula 21]

So Brown was our leading tackler and he never saw the field?

[Steve]

Brown was on the field somewhat less than 50% of the snaps. His production wasn't great, but it isn't horrible. His big plays really fell off because we didn't use him like a blitzer (we did with Pagano), which minimizes his big-play potential.

[Formula 21]

And Kyle Emmanuel should be moved back to DE.

[Steve]

Emmanuel has just about zero pass rush ability. He has 3 career sacks, and he had plenty of chances under Pagano and hardly did anything.

[pigskin]

1. R. Smith LB
2. T. Edmonds LB
3. M. Fitzpatrick S/CB

Of players that will probably be there

1. Vander Esch LB
2. M. Hurst/ D. Payne DT (I like Hurst a little more by a slim margin, but Payne is more of a need at NT)
3. H. Landry Edge

[chargerkdb]

Reverse your 1 and 2 on both lists. Not sure about Landry at 17.

[pigskin]

I see edge rusher as a need (rotation guy) and its a week DE class. There is no guarantee there will be one availabe in the later rounds and I like him better then Davenport.

[richpjr]

James
Payne
Hurst

[blueman]

Trade up (future pick plus Verrett?) for Chubb if he falls to 6 or lower.

Stand pat and take Evans (agree with Fleet, dude is a perfect fit).

Trade down a few picks for ???, depends on who we trade with but we could nab a good edge rusher plus another second or third in a very rich D draft.

[Formula 21]

[Fleet]

I didnt know we could pick players that are projected to go in the top 10 or higher. I was putting players we probably have a chance at.

1. Chubb
2. Edmunds
3. Fitzpatrick

[blueman]

Well I went with three options for the pick, no way Chubb falls to us but we can trade up if we want to.

[Bolt-O]

I get it wrong almost all the time (except for Mathews), so I won't even try... maybe say Jackson for an anti-vote. All I want is the pick to be available for all preseason games and is contributing Game 1,