Gerald McCoy

[Budsman]

https://www.profootballrumors.com/2019/05/buccaneers-plan-to-release-gerald-mccoy?fv-home=true&post-id=143635

Looks like Suh has some competition in FA. I would love McCoy on a short term deal. I suspect he's going to command decent money, less than the 13m he was making but decent money. Time for McGuire to do some fuzzy math and make this happen.

[like54ninjas]

Gerald McCoy #93 DT

Tampa Bay Buccaneers | Official Team Site

Height: 6-4 Weight: 300 Age: 31

Born: 2/25/1988 Oklahoma City , OK

College: Oklahoma

Experience: 10th season

High School: Southeast HS [Oklahoma City, OK]

RECENT GAMESMORE
WK	OPP	RESULT		Tackles					Interceptions						Fumbles
				Comb	Total	Ast	Sck	SFTY	PDef	Int	Yds	Avg	Lng	TDs	FF
15	@BAL	L 12-20		3	2	1	0.0	--	1	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
16	@DAL	L 20-27		1	1	0	0.0	--	0	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
17	ATL	L 32-34		4	3	1	0.0	--	0	--	--	0.0	--	--	0

CAREER STATSMORE
Season	Team			Tackles					Interceptions						Fumbles
		G	GS	Comb	Total	Ast	Sck	SFTY	PDef	Int	Yds	Avg	Lng	TDs	FF
2018	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	14	14	28	17	11	6.0	--	1	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
2017	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	15	15	47	33	14	6.0	--	1	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
2016	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	15	15	34	26	8	7.0	--	5	--	--	0.0	--	--	2
2015	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	15	15	34	26	8	8.5	--	1	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
2014	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	13	13	35	28	7	8.5	--	3	--	--	0.0	--	--	1
2013	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	16	16	50	35	15	9.5	--	4	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
2012	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	16	16	30	23	7	5.0	--	2	--	--	0.0	--	--	1
2011	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	6	6	11	10	1	1.0	--	0	--	--	0.0	--	--	0
2010	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	13	13	28	22	6	3.0	--	4	--	--	0.0	--	--	2
TOTAL				297	220	77	54.5	0	21	0	0	--	0	0	6

[jamrock]

go get him TT

[Bolts & Noles]

Be nice to get a little help at DT,for the right price.He would get to come compete for a contender with 2 bookends.

[Steve]

Since they just spent the 1st round pick on a player who plays the same position, pretty unlikely.

[SYB]

Since they just spent the 1st round pick on a player who plays the same position, pretty unlikely.

My thought as well, in addition to a 7th. I don't see them making a play for Suh either, but he at least has a little more flexibility along the DL and could take some snaps at NT.

[Xenos]

My thought as well, in addition to a 7th. I don't see them making a play for Suh either, but he at least has a little more flexibility along the DL and could take some snaps at NT.

I don't remember Suh ever playing NT anywhere he went.

[Steve]

I don't remember Suh ever playing NT anywhere he went.

Last year with the Rams he was a 34 NT. He is better suited to being a 43 NT.

That being said, if we were going to make a play for Suh, we would have signed him instead of Square.

[Xenos]

Last year with the Rams he was a 34 NT. He is better suited to being a 43 NT.

That being said, if we were going to make a play for Suh, we would have signed him instead of Square.

Really? I thought it was Brockers.

[SYB]

Last year with the Rams he was a 34 NT. He is better suited to being a 43 NT.

That being said, if we were going to make a play for Suh, we would have signed him instead of Square.

Exactly.

And the only reason I even brought his name up at this point was because he would be a better fit than McCoy at this point, given his position flexibility and the roster makeup.

[SYB]

Really? I thought it was Brockers.

They split time, but pretty sure that Suh was the "starter" there.

[Xenos]

:umno:

They split time, but pretty sure that Suh was the "starter" there.

No wonder they were awful against the run last year.