2021 Draft- Olinemen

[Boltjolt]

I would consider Leatherwood as OT only, Christensen OT possibly, and Newman IOL+ emergency OT only.

Thorn sounds to be about there too.

I was surprised he has Christensen so high. Thorn is gaga over Dickerson--I mean top10 gaga.

Dickerson is good. Just injury prone.

[wu-dai clan]

Darrisaw fanboys...

do NOT watch

Hokies vs Flames.

He puts the lack in lackadaisical.

It was a trend too.

Started vs BDevils.

You've been warned.

[Lone Bolt]

Darrisaw fanboys...

do NOT watch

Hokies vs Flames.

He puts the lack in lackadaisical.

It was a trend too.

Started vs BDevils.

You've been warned.

They ain't listening...some of these Darrisaw fans act like you are attacking their adopted son if you offer criticism...the same criticism that is even now starting to pop up in pundit reviews.

Quincy Roche must be the next Chase Young, to hear how Darrisaw bravely held him off...he must have tore up the ACC last year....?

The film shows question marks, inconsistent effort, pedestrian movement speed at times...but don't point it out....your just a "Newbie tape watcher"...only allowed to talk about the good aspects of the film.

But forget about the tape, he has great strength and athletic metrics, right? Let me check my notes....gotta be here somewhere....

I ain't drinking the Darrisaw Kool-Aid...I'll let the Bolts check the ingredients first....if they are satisfied with the parts, and the answers to some of the questions around this prospect, they probably take him at 13...makes a ton of sense....and I'm all in. Until then, he is a decent prospect with coveted traits, but a few warts as well....not the messiah some on here want him to be.

Hell, I don't even think my overall opinion of Darrisaw, and how good a prospect he is is all that far off from the fans....I don't even think the quality of the prospect is the true issue at debate here. I think this all boils down to the line between those fans, like me, who are willing to pass on a decent LT prospect in favor of a much cleaner, better prospect at a different position, at pick #13....and the fans who believe a decent LT prospect trumps the board.

[Boltjolt]

They ain't listening...some of these Darrisaw fans act like you are attacking their adopted son if you offer criticism...the same criticism that is even now starting to pop up in pundit reviews.

Quincy Roche must be the next Chase Young, to hear how Darrisaw bravely held him off...he must have tore up the ACC last year....?

The film shows question marks, inconsistent effort, pedestrian movement speed at times...but don't point it out....your just a "Newbie tape watcher"...only allowed to talk about the good aspects of the film.

But forget about the tape, he has great strength and athletic metrics, right? Let me check my notes....gotta be here somewhere....

I ain't drinking the Darrisaw Kool-Aid...I'll let the Bolts check the ingredients first....if they are satisfied with the parts, and the answers to some of the questions around this prospect, they probably take him at 13...makes a ton of sense....and I'm all in. Until then, he is a decent prospect with coveted traits, but a few warts as well....not the messiah some on here want him to be.

Hell, I don't even think my overall opinion of Darrisaw, and how good a prospect he is is all that far off from the fans....I don't even think the quality of the prospect is the true issue at debate here. I think this all boils down to the line between those fans, like me, who are willing to pass on a decent LT prospect in favor of a much cleaner, better prospect at a different position, at pick #13....and the fans who believe a decent LT prospect trumps the board.

Not a big fan of Roche.

[TexanBeerlover]

The Chargers have put themselves in a position that LT does trump the board. Couple reasons, they’re expensive as hell and rare as hens teeth. You can live with warts just know how to treat them, with right specialist.

[La Costa Boy]

You know.......

I hate to say it..........

But Notre Dame has 4 or 5 draftable O linemen this year.............

All day 2 and 3 guys IMHO...............

Tom could feast late........................

[powderblueboy]

You know.......

I hate to say it..........

But Notre Dame has 4 or 5 draftable O linemen this year.............

All day 2 and 3 guys IMHO...............

Tom could feast late........................

As long as their first name ain't Liam.....i'm fine.

[powderblueboy]

They ain't listening...some of these Darrisaw fans act like you are attacking their adopted son if you offer criticism...the same criticism that is even now starting to pop up in pundit reviews.

Quincy Roche must be the next Chase Young, to hear how Darrisaw bravely held him off...he must have tore up the ACC last year....?

The film shows question marks, inconsistent effort, pedestrian movement speed at times...but don't point it out....your just a "Newbie tape watcher"...only allowed to talk about the good aspects of the film.

But forget about the tape, he has great strength and athletic metrics, right? Let me check my notes....gotta be here somewhere....

I ain't drinking the Darrisaw Kool-Aid...I'll let the Bolts check the ingredients first....if they are satisfied with the parts, and the answers to some of the questions around this prospect, they probably take him at 13...makes a ton of sense....and I'm all in. Until then, he is a decent prospect with coveted traits, but a few warts as well....not the messiah some on here want him to be.

Hell, I don't even think my overall opinion of Darrisaw, and how good a prospect he is is all that far off from the fans....I don't even think the quality of the prospect is the true issue at debate here. I think this all boils down to the line between those fans, like me, who are willing to pass on a decent LT prospect in favor of a much cleaner, better prospect at a different position, at pick #13....and the fans who believe a decent LT prospect trumps the board.

I'm worried about Telesco's judgement on Olinemen.

He reportedly had Andrew Thomas as his top rated offensive lineman: not Wills, Wirfs or Bechton.

[like54ninjas]

I'm worried about Telesco's judgement on Olinemen.

He reportedly had Andrew Thomas as his top rated offensive lineman: not Wills, Wirfs or Bechton.

AT had a really rough first half of 2020 season but his last 6 games he performed/graded much better in passpro.
He should continue on that upward trend going forward.
Thomas graded out above average as a run blocker.

[Bolt Dude]

I'm worried about Telesco's judgement on Olinemen.

He reportedly had Andrew Thomas as his top rated offensive lineman: not Wills, Wirfs or Bechton.

Yikes. More evidence that he’s an arm length guy. Thomas had the longest of the bunch (36 1/8).

[wu-dai clan]

As long as their first name ain't Liam.....i'm fine.

I am not trying to be flippant here, just enlightening, by asking an honest, relevant question.

What is your projection for the difference in wins between drafting Darrisaw at #13 vs drafting Eichenberg at #47 ?

Their sack numbers are similar, but Eichenberg is more consistent, from my perspective.

The Mockdraftable spider graph chart images are almost diametrically opposed !

We have a BUNCH of short armed, quick footed OTs in this draft.

The vibe I personally keep getting off the consensus pick at #13, Darrisaw, is Gaitheresque.

Hmmm.

AVT at #13.
Eichenberg, Radunz, Walker at #47.
In my humble opinion.

[wu-dai clan]

Yikes. More evidence that he’s an arm length guy. Thomas had the longest of the bunch (36 1/8).

We have a new OC, HC.
And Frank Smith likes teachable players with grit (Cosmi at #47?)
Hopefully TT will coordinate well with the staff.
Staley seems to be an arm length guy too.
I expect much Wide Zone from LAC,
and prize several traits over arm length.
We'll see.