Best Available Player Poll!!!!

[like54ninjas]

I disagre. I think the OL class is way deeper than the WR's. You just have to go with the sexy pick. Seriously though unless it's Sewell or Slater I don't see them not taking WR. You got the Bugatti, now get the best possible performance tires for JH. Do the same as last year. Get Waddle then trade back into the 1st round and get Derrisaw or Leatherwood. Give up the 3rd round compensatory pick with 1 or 2 low rounders next year. That would be a helluva 1st round. . :shifty::shifty:

Just no. No to WR I the first. No to Leatherwood as OLT.

[dmac_bolt]

Pitts is the only guy I’d draft instead of a LT at 13.

[Fleet]

Pitts - though he’ll be gone. There are ten tackles in the top fifty. While a TE is less valuable than a tackle, Pitts is a once in a decade player.

Welcome to the Blues.

[SuperCharged]

Who should I replace the Pitts pick with? There's absolutely no way he falls to 13. That was wishful thinking on my part.

Should I replace Rousseau? His stock has plummeted since is lack luster pro day. Lets adjust the poll 2 weeks out?

[TexanBeerlover]

Who should I replace the Pitts pick with? There's absolutely no way he falls to 13. That was wishful thinking on my part.

Should I replace Rousseau? His stock has plummeted since is lack luster pro day. Lets adjust the poll 2 weeks out?

Caleb Farley

[chargeroo]

The only position I've spent time studying this year is OT. I feel strongly that they would have signed Tevi for a couple more years if they hadn't intended to get a new guy for LOT.

I am a bit different than most about the top LOT's - I think there are four that I've watched that could fill that hole for us - my four are Sewell, Slater, Little and Darisaw. I hope they take one them at #13 and fill that need for an LOT for a few years. If all of them are picked already I'd be hoping for Farley.

[like54ninjas]

The only position I've spent time studying this year is OT. I feel strongly that they would have signed Tevi for a couple more years if they hadn't intended to get a new guy for LOT.

I am a bit different than most about the top LOT's - I think there are four that I've watched that could fill that hole for us - my four are Sewell, Slater, Little and Darisaw. I hope they take one them at #13 and fill that need for an LOT for a few years. If all of them are picked already I'd be hoping for Farley.

:toyou:

Well said brother Roo!
I like Jenkins over Slater in the top 4 OT prospects.
Darrisaw still concerns me but the package with potential is a better fit than Slater.

Farley is my top non OT @#13.

[chargeroo]

:toyou:

Well said brother Roo!
I like Jenkins over Slater in the top 4 OT prospects.
Darrisaw still concerns me but the package with potential is a better fit than Slater.

Farley is my top non OT @#13.

There's a lot to like with Jenkins but I wonder about switching him to the left? Going from college to the NFL is often a tough transition but also switching positions could make for a rough rookie year.

[like54ninjas]

There's a lot to like with Jenkins but I wonder about switching him to the left? Going from college to the NFL is often a tough transition but also switching positions could make for a rough rookie year.

Agreed.
He looked good in his limited snaps @OLT.
I think he has the skillset to flip his footwork to the left side.
If not we have a PB caliber ORT in 2022 as we wave bye to Bulaga.

[chargeroo]

Agreed.
He looked good in his limited snaps @OLT.
I think he has the skillset to flip his footwork to the left side.
If not we have a PB caliber ORT in 2022 as we wave bye to Bulaga.

Isn't that Pipkins job? :lol:

I look forward to what #10 can do with a good OL but I'm equally excited over the prospect of watching our RB's with some good run blocking. With the new IOL and the prospect of adding a good LOT, the sky is the limit for the offense.

[Boltnut]

Isn't that Pipkins job? :lol:

I look forward to what #10 can do with a good OL but I'm equally excited over the prospect of watching our RB's with some good run blocking. With the new IOL and the prospect of adding a good LOT, the sky is the limit for the offense.

Me too! In regards to Teven Jenkins... RT is probably the position he gets drafted for. His sub-33' arms will scare most teams off. I suspect we'll also draft a LG (3rd/4th?) to take over Feiler's spot in 2022. I think Feiler will become our RT in 2022.

IIRC, Feiler isn't as strong at run blocking as he is at pass blocking. Therefore, a good run-blocking LT might be in order. Imagine Chrsitian Darrisaw @LT and Kendrick Green/David Moore @LG in 2022...

LT Darrisaw
LG Green
OC Linsley
RG Aboushi
RT Feiler

[like54ninjas]

Me too! In regards to Teven Jenkins... RT is probably the position he gets drafted for. His sub-33' arms will scare most teams off. I suspect we'll also draft a LG (3rd/4th?) to take over Feiler's spot in 2022. I think Feiler will become our RT in 2022.

IIRC, Feiler isn't as strong at run blocking as he is at pass blocking. Therefore, a good run-blocking LT might be in order. Imagine Chrsitian Darrisaw @LT and Kendrick Green/David Moore @LG in 2022...

LT Darrisaw
LG Green
OC Linsley
RG Aboushi
RT Feiler

Teven Jenkins has 33.5” arm length.

Feiler’s sub 33” arms don’t scare you?
He has shown capable of holding his own in limited starts there.

.

Teven Jenkins, DS #4 OT, Oklahoma State

Name: Teven Jenkins (+) Coming off Nov 2020 Back INJ College: Oklahoma State Number: 73 Height: 6-5 Weight: 317 Position: OT Pos2: OG Class/Draft Year: rSr/2021 40 Low: 4.95 40 Time: 5.01 40 High: 5.08 Projected Round: 4 Stock:

Combine Results		Pro Day Results
Combine Invite: Yes Height: 6057 Weight: 317 Zybek PD3X AKA "Official" 40 Yard Dash (ET): 40 Yard Dash (HH): 20 Yard (ET): 20 Yard (HH): 10 Yard (ET): 10 Yard (HH):	225 Lb. Bench Reps: Vertical Jump: Broad Jump: 20 Yrd Shuttle: 3-Cone Drill:	Dates: 04/01/21 Hand: 09 1/2 Arm: 33 1/2 Wingspan: 81 Height: 6057 Weight: 317 40 Yrd Dash: 5.01 20 Yrd Dash: 2.88 10 Yrd Dash: 1.77	225 Lb. Bench Reps: 36 Vertical Jump: 32 1/2 Broad Jump: 08'10" 20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.68 3-Cone Drill: 7.69 40 Time Range: 4.99-5.03/Projected 5.27