Originally posted by ghost
View Post
Its frankly hard to untangle the irrationality of your post....so i won't even attempt it.
I'll just say that football is a business: why should i care if Spanos didn't get his money's worth with Ingram last year?
Dean Spanos was no doubt angered that the hired help didn't know its place, and dared play economic brinkmanship games with him - and succeeded;
he is used to bargaining in bad faith, and chiseling off others. No doubt, Ingram was persona non grata in the Spanos household and i wouldn't be surprised one bit
if the decision to not bring Ingram back was a Dean Spanos decision. Its the attitude of a spoiled brat who would rather let his emotions rule him than create a winning franchise.
The Charger franchise is run by an emotional cripple.....bummer for us.
It made perfect sense to bring Ingram back at a reduced salary and role....impactful edge rushers don't grow on trees, as you seem to suggest; and the Chargers were better positioned than anyone to assess the physical state of Ingram. When Ingram initially got no offers, it would have behooved Charger management to begin the process towards bringing him back. But, then again, they are a loser franchise.
But why did Ingram's actions make you so upset that you can't see straight on this issue? What blows me away is how some here stick to their conviction over the course of the season; even after it blew up in their face last Sunday. There is no, yeah i guess it was a mistake....just a few stubborn people who double down & stick their heads deeper into the sand. You get comments like: ' well, i saw Ingram stumble in a Steeler game'. WTF?
Chargers D could really have used Ingram badly this year. It was the difference between making the playoffs, or once again sitting home and watching the Chiefs advance.
Comment