Thought it would be a good idea to take this out of the Keenan Allen thread and start a new topic. To those of you more knowledgeable than I am on this kind of stuff;
21&500 brought up the concept of going away from the stud edge pass rushers, mainly because of the NFL's continuous enabling of offensive tackles to grab and hold, thus generally negating the value of those (highly paid) edge rushers. The concept is about resource allocation; is it better to have solid (inexpensive) edge setters at the end positions and generate pass rush in some other manner? If an average (and relatively inexpensive) OT can largely negate an elite and very expensive edge rusher's ability to effect play by creatively holding does it make sense to invest in other positions to generate a pass rush?
Would this concept work? Is anyone currently running something like this in the league?
Lefty2SLO;
I haven't thought about it this way, but it makes sense. Do we get edge setters (solid but unspectacular) and then . . . . blitz to get pressure? That way the defense is less predictable?
21&500:
That's exactly what I've thinking about all offseason.
maybe a bunch of lower round, big bodies to beatup and wear down an Oline for a few quarters and use DBs to blitz on occasion. Just seems like such a waste to draft these stud athletes at edge just to have qbs throw the ball before they get a chance to beat the OTs and the few times they succeed, the OT will get away with holding or the DE will get flagged for touching the qb.
Comment