Tweet
Originally posted by CanadianBoltFan
View Post
-
Agree, I'm not taking OT or Bowers at #5...how about this...Flip with the giants at #6 for a third and still draft Nabers...
Chiefs won the Superbowl with 10 Rookies....
"Locked, Cocked, and ready to Rock!" Jim Harbaugh
-
1000 % yesOriginally posted by gzubeck View Post
Agree, I'm not taking OT or Bowers at #5...how about this...Flip with the giants at #6 for a third and still draft Nabers...
Comment
-
From NFL scouts and WR coaches...not mediaOriginally posted by blueman View Post
Maybe Hortiz was serious and honest when saying Nabers is the best WR he has ever scoutedComment
-
Nabers is the one and only player of recent vintage I would not be embarassed to mention in the same sentence as Tyreek.Originally posted by CanadianBoltFan View Post
What matters though, are GRo and Jimbo's thoughts.
Let's do this.
Failure is not a possibility.We do not play modern football.Comment
-
Tyreek was mentioned by NFL WR coach as was Chase when talking about Nabers in the articleOriginally posted by wu-dai clan View PostComment
-
If we trade down to 11, I'm taking Bowers if he gets drafted prior to 11 I'm taking Fuaga or JC at 11! 23 I'm going Brian Thomas or Powers!Originally posted by gzubeck View Post
Agree, I'm not taking OT or Bowers at #5...how about this...Flip with the giants at #6 for a third and still draft Nabers...
Comment
-
Just gaining a 3rd rounder with the 5th pick of this year is clearly not enough !Originally posted by gzubeck View Post
Agree, I'm not taking OT or Bowers at #5...how about this...Flip with the giants at #6 for a third and still draft Nabers...
Comment
-
I will take a high 3rd round pick to move down one spot to 6 and still get Nabers in a heartbeat.Originally posted by Maniaque 6 View PostComment
-
I prefer the 11-23 option + ?????
Naber could be there at 6 or not
He could be there too at 11.Comment
-
I understand you would prefer the trade back should the opportunity present itself. But I must say the #11 and #23 option is not an "option" at all. Unless you can show a report from somebody on the Vikings saying they are offering this to the Chargers. It's not an "option".Originally posted by Maniaque 6 View Post
This was created by media and content creators over the last month to continue to drive clicks during this busy time of year. I'm actually surprised how many fans have fallen for this and talk about it as if it's a done deal so much so as fans are actually mocking the picks at #11 and #23 more than they are mocking picks for #5.
Paying ZERO attention to Harbaugh and Hortiz's press conferences or to the fact that Minnesota has no interest in meeting New England or Arizona's ask and thus obviously not the Chargers ask either.
Oh, and this is assuming very much the Chargers even want to trade out as a 1st/2nd or 3rd option because they DON'T and have said as much.Comment
-
Nabers would be there in that scenario. If the Giants are coming up its for a QB.Originally posted by Maniaque 6 View PostComment
-
If it's Drake Maye on the board.Originally posted by gzubeck View Post
Agree, I'm not taking OT or Bowers at #5...how about this...Flip with the giants at #6 for a third and still draft Nabers...
I would ask for pick #47 and 2025 4th. Then see if we can settle for Pick #70 and a 2025 3rd. This would be a fleecing and would work by putting them against the Vikings "possible offer" to scare them.
If it's McCarthy the Giants won't be as interested.
They would then have (3) 2025 3rd round picks and could use one to trade away for a True CB1.Comment
Comment