Which Trade Package Would You Want For #5?

[Parcells]

Assuming these packages were on the table at #5 (and that the Cardinals had drafted MHJ), which package are you taking.

[Parcells]

I voted the Denver package…I think they’re gonna suck the next couple of years.

[Boltjolt]

I wouldn't ask for 2026 first rounders.

Raiders 12 & id ask for their 2nd, 3rd and 2025 1st


Broncos 13, 3rd , 2025 1st and Surtain.

They got nothing else enticing but that 2026 1st and I need some picks for this year as well. So if no Surtain, I'm not trading with them.

[Jrock1970]

I'd take Minny.....however, #11,#23, and '25 1st not enough.
Chargers get-#11,#23 ,#129 and '25 1st
Minny gets- #5, #105
If Denver
Chargers get-#12,#76, '25 1st and Pat Surtain or #12,#76 and '25 2nd and Surtain
Denver gets- #5
If Raiders
Chargers get- #13,#44,#77 and'25 1st
Raiders get-#5,#110

Horitz done said it's a fleecing you'll be getting or stay the heck back💯😁
I'd rather start by seeing if Giants are willing to deal
Chargers get-#6,#70 and #166
Giants get#5 and #181....then try to trade back again to #12-#15 range...pick up a couple more picks then try to trade back into #25-#27 range with a couple new '24 picks + '25 1st and 4th
😁😁😁😁😁

[Ghost of Quacksaw]

I don't want to trade with a division rival, if I have a solid offer coming from somewhere else. I voted accordingly.

I have to say, though, I'd consider making the deal with Denver if it got the Bolts Patrick Surtain, as JRock outlines. That would be an outrageously good deal for the Chargers.

[Jack Burton]

3 1’s and a pro bowl starter. Preferably on a rookie contract.

[Boltjolt]

I'd take Minny.....however, #11,#23, and '25 1st not enough.
Chargers get-#11,#23 ,#129 and '25 1st
Minny gets- #5, #105
If Denver
Chargers get-#12,#76, '25 1st and Pat Surtain or #12,#76 and '25 2nd and Surtain
Denver gets- #5
If Raiders
Chargers get- #13,#44,#77 and'25 1st
Raiders get-#5,#110

Horitz done said it's a fleecing you'll be getting or stay the heck back💯😁
I'd rather start by seeing if Giants are willing to deal
Chargers get-#6,#70 and #166
Giants get#5 and #181....then try to trade back again to #12-#15 range...pick up a couple more picks then try to trade back into #25-#27 range with a couple new '24 picks + '25 1st and 4th
😁😁😁😁😁

Why do you think that's better? I'd rather keep 105 than have their 129

[Fleet 1]

Id go MN trade. Use the 1 next year with the 2nd rounder to get back into the 1st. Then have 3 1sts with 5th year options. Harbaugh promised 5 years. Might as well start stacking this draft.

[Jrock1970]

Why do you think that's better? I'd rather keep 105 than have their 129

I want minimum 3- '24 picks(higher end) + a '25 1st. if we have to give one of our 4's....so be it. If we don't have to cheers!!...but I'm ok with giving up 1 4th to make it work when we have 2. It just depends on what they're willing to give up.

[Boltjolt]

I want minimum 3- '24 picks(higher end) + a '25 1st. if we have to give one of our 4's....so be it. If we don't have to cheers!!...but I'm ok with giving up 1 4th to make it work when we have 2. It just depends on what they're willing to give up.

But it doesn't make any sense to do that.

From their point of view, doing that is giving them a little something back in their favor and it may be something they ask for.
If they aren't, ... I'm not doing that just to say I got three 2024 picks because the one I have in that round is better.

[Jrock1970]

But it doesn't make any sense to do that.

From their point of view, doing that is giving them a little something back in their favor and it may be something they ask for.
If they aren't, ... I'm not doing that just to say I got three 2024 picks because the one I have in that round is better.

That wasn't the point. If they HAVE to to consumate the trade then I'm ok with it. Those were examples of min return needed/maximum I'd give up. There's a good chance NO team will allow themselves to be severely fleeced. If Horitz & Co value #5 more than what teams are willing to pay then they just keep n pick. We don't know how much they really want to bargain. They may be saying ALL YOU GOT is the starting point for negotiations to compel teams to inexcusably overpay and seeing who will bite, then work backwards from there. I dont personally want to let go of anything but #5 but I understand that they may have to if they truly WANT to move down.😁

[Parcells]

I don't want to trade with a division rival, if I have a solid offer coming from somewhere else. I voted accordingly.

I have to say, though, I'd consider making the deal with Denver if it got the Bolts Patrick Surtain, as JRock outlines. That would be an outrageously good deal for the Chargers.

I get the apprehension trading with a division rival, but if the trade guts them and they suck, then not only have you hurt them but they’re potentially feeding you top 10 or even top 5 picks. Just look at the fact that Chicago is about to land a franchise QB with the first overall pick they obtained in a trade down last year.