Originally posted by ghost
View Post
NFL Teams Discussion | Other Teams News
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
- Top
- Bottom
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt4Knob View Post
And those teams, include the Bills too, are why I want the cap to stay in the 180-182 range, nothing much over 185. The extra cash will help those teams more than it will help the Chargers.
As for Tevi, Lamp and Feeney - the market should decide what they get paid
I too am on the Feiler bandwagon - Steelers probably cannot bring him back more than likelyMy 2021 Adopt-A-Bolt List
MikeDub
K9
Nasir
Tillery
Parham
Reed
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by like54ninjas View Post
Bears, Saints, Giants and Vikings are in cap trouble as well.
Jason who runs OTC does a good job with the Cap. This just shows how bad the Eagles and Saints are but other teams aren't in great shape. But it just shows the Chargers are in good space this year as well as 2022 if they need to go a bit lighter on cap hits compared to AAV and can make up for it next year.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt4Knob View Post
NFL Salary Cap Space | Over The Cap
Jason who runs OTC does a good job with the Cap. This just shows how bad the Eagles and Saints are but other teams aren't in great shape. But it just shows the Chargers are in good space this year as well as 2022 if they need to go a bit lighter on cap hits compared to AAV and can make up for it next year.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
If I'm John Lynch of 49ers, I'm calling Texans and making a ridiculous offer to pry away Deshaun Watson-QB.
Texans, What do you need to say yes?
Three 1st, two 3rds, a starting QB to replace Watson.
And a starting DL to replace JJ Watt.
J.Garoppollo-QB
A.Armstead-DL
2021 #12
2022 1st and 3rd
2023 1st and 3rd
Who has it better than us?
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltnut View Post
Remember to look at column 3 (#). It shows you how many players are signed currently. The Chargers (#) is 48. Many of the teams have 55-60 signed. Also remember that 10 of those 48 are "futures" players... and probably end up on the practice squad. Chargers don't have as much cap space as it looks on the surface.
when March will be a great month for buyers ?
If anything, it is advantage LAC.We do not play modern football.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Critty View PostIf I'm John Lynch of 49ers, I'm calling Texans and making a ridiculous offer to pry away Deshaun Watson-QB.
Texans, What do you need to say yes?
Three 1st, two 3rds, a starting QB to replace Watson.
And a starting DL to replace JJ Watt.
J.Garoppollo-QB
A.Armstead-DL
2021 #12
2022 1st and 3rd
2023 1st and 3rd
My 2021 Adopt-A-Bolt List
MikeDub
K9
Nasir
Tillery
Parham
Reed
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wu-dai clan View Post
So, again I ask you Irwin Allen, how is this a problem in February,
when March will be a great month for buyers ?
If anything, it is advantage LAC.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltnut View Post
Certain FA's will need to be re-signed in February (HH, RJ, MD, and a variety of others) leaving us much less cap space to fix that "Towering Inferno" of an offensive line in March.
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by like54ninjas View Post
I’ll take that deal.
The Texans get back into rd 1 this year.
Get a QB and replacing Watt.
49ers if all is successful gave up that early #12 and Armstead for the QB swap.
And then as they have great seasons in playoffs the 2022 and 2023 1st and 3rd are toward the bottom of those rds. Those are not high top of rd picks.
They are not finding a Watson at the bottom of Rd 1 in 2022 and 2023.
And they can use UFA signing to get proven vets to make up for some of those picks.
I think all assets should be use to improve a team any way possible.
As I look back at drafts toward bottom 3rd rd picks, they are not locks to be good. And the two 1st if toward bottom of rd 1 are not often superstars either..
But you know what D.Watson is.
This is not a Hershell Walker deal .or a Ricky Williams deal.
It's a QB driven league. This is a deal for 49ers to compete for Championship for next decade
Who has it better than us?
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltjolt View Post
They can release Turner, restructure MW or release Hayward when ever they want. Tomorrow works.
And its not like Tevi, Feeney or Lamp are priorities - the market needs to dictate what those three guys get paid. Not the Chargers. Henry is a priority I guess but again, they can franchise him to try to get a longer deal. Mike Davis - I want him back but again, maybe he needs to see the market as well. Granted, he and HH I would like back
Everybody else - test the market
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Critty View Post
Think it's a win win for both.
The Texans get back into rd 1 this year.
Get a QB and replacing Watt.
49ers if all is successful gave up that early #12 and Armstead for the QB swap.
And then as they have great seasons in playoffs the 2022 and 2023 1st and 3rd are toward the bottom of those rds. Those are not high top of rd picks.
They are not finding a Watson at the bottom of Rd 1 in 2022 and 2023.
And they can use UFA signing to get proven vets to make up for some of those picks.
I think all assets should be use to improve a team any way possible.
As I look back at drafts toward bottom 3rd rd picks, they are not locks to be good. And the two 1st if toward bottom of rd 1 are not often superstars either..
But you know what D.Watson is.
This is not a Hershell Walker deal .or a Ricky Williams deal.
It's a QB driven league. This is a deal for 49ers to compete for Championship for next decade
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment