Worst case scenario at #6...what to do?

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Critty
    replied
    Another look back at takes :dunno:

    Leave a comment:


  • nomad1946
    replied
    Originally posted by powderblueboy View Post

    If Tua is below Love, then he's probably off Tom Telesco's board.
    I hope so.

    Leave a comment:


  • powderblueboy
    replied
    Originally posted by gzubeck View Post

    Take Love over Tua? Oh my....time to trade out and draft neither at that point.
    If Tua is below Love, then he's probably off Tom Telesco's board.

    Leave a comment:


  • sonorajim
    replied
    With Burrow, Young, Simmons, Tua, Herbert off the board? Brown, Okudah are tempting, I don't like 1st rd WRs, I believe Wills is the most plug & play ready OT. Gimme OT Wills.

    Leave a comment:


  • like54ninjas
    replied
    Originally posted by Critty View Post

    I see what you're saying.
    Went back and watched Thomas & Becton.

    Becton is the more powerful and massive talent.
    Thomas did a much better job finding work and continuing to work with multiple efforts and better awareness. Becton missed opportunities to work and find more work, saw some one effort snaps.

    Thomas looks like the safer and more pro ready talent.
    Accurate assessment. I concur.

    Leave a comment:


  • Critty
    replied
    Originally posted by beachcomber View Post
    when you're drafting this high, just don't see how you gloss over the risk factor w/some of these guys, i.e. Becton.... allowed more pressures than is ideal of late and has a weight consideration.

    perhaps nothing to be alarmed about, and.... why take the gambit when you have much safer options in Andrew Thomas and Tristan Wirfs ??
    I see what you're saying.
    Went back and watched Thomas & Becton.

    Becton is the more powerful and massive talent.
    Thomas did a much better job finding work and continuing to work with multiple efforts and better awareness. Becton missed opportunities to work and find more work, saw some one effort snaps.

    Thomas looks like the safer and more pro ready talent.

    Leave a comment:


  • gzubeck
    replied
    Originally posted by Critty View Post
    I won't be shocked if they draft QB at #6.

    My guess is these are Telesco top 10 which includes 4 QBs.

    1.Burrow-QB
    2.Young-DE
    3.Simmons-LB
    4.Okudah-CB
    5.Herbert-QB
    6.Love-QB
    7.Tua-QB

    8.Becton-OT
    9.Jeudy-WR
    10.Lamb-WR

    Take Love over Tua? Oh my....time to trade out and draft neither at that point.

    Leave a comment:


  • gzubeck
    replied
    Originally posted by powderblueboy View Post

    Lone Bolt's scenario
    1. Cincy gets Burrows,
    Lions and Giants go Young/Simmons
    2. Jags trade with Giants to pick Tua
    3. Fins take Herbert(Not a worst case for some here...)
    4. Okuda, Brown, and a fistful of olinemen left at #6...but we just nabbed Harris, Joseph...and for the purpose of this exercise, let's say they love Pipkins at LT...


    ?????
    1. Burrow (cincy)
    2. Young (washington)
    3. Okudah (detroit)
    4. Simmons
    5. tua/herbert

    If okudah drops (& tua/herbert both gone) take him - easy. You are not drafting okudah because you have Michael Davis out wide? The others are in their 30s.

    Or draft the best OT - again easy. I'd prefer that 3 qbs go ahead.

    If you draft a qb at #6 (Herbert) friendly to A Lynn's offensive scheme, and A Lynn is gone at the end of next year,
    where does that leave you? That also applies to Hurts.
    Ouch! I would be thinking both of these QB's are better than read once and then run up the middle! LOL!

    Leave a comment:


  • beachcomber
    replied
    when you're drafting this high, just don't see how you gloss over the risk factor w/some of these guys, i.e. Becton.... allowed more pressures than is ideal of late and has a weight consideration.

    perhaps nothing to be alarmed about, and.... why take the gambit when you have much safer options in Andrew Thomas and Tristan Wirfs ??

    Leave a comment:


  • Critty
    replied
    I won't be shocked if they draft QB at #6.

    My guess is these are Telesco top 10 which includes 4 QBs.

    1.Burrow-QB
    2.Young-DE
    3.Simmons-LB
    4.Okudah-CB
    5.Herbert-QB
    6.Love-QB
    7.Tua-QB
    8.Becton-OT
    9.Jeudy-WR
    10.Lamb-WR


    Leave a comment:


  • JOJAX85
    replied
    My worse case scenario is if with all the talent left on the board we actually draft Love at 6. I don't care about his measurables. All I see is 17 picks in the Mountain West. Not the SEC. Not even the PAC12.
    The Mountain Fucking West.
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boltjolt
    replied
    Originally posted by powderblueboy View Post

    Lone Bolt's scenario
    1. Cincy gets Burrows,
    Lions and Giants go Young/Simmons
    2. Jags trade with Giants to pick Tua
    3. Fins take Herbert(Not a worst case for some here...)
    4. Okuda, Brown, and a fistful of olinemen left at #6...but we just nabbed Harris, Joseph...and for the purpose of this exercise, let's say they love Pipkins at LT...


    ?????
    1. Burrow (cincy)
    2. Young (washington)
    3. Okudah (detroit)
    4. Simmons
    5. tua/herbert

    If okudah drops (& tua/herbert both gone) take him - easy. You are not drafting okudah because you have Michael Davis out wide? The others are in their 30s.

    Or draft the best OT - again easy. I'd prefer that 3 qbs go ahead.

    If you draft a qb at #6 (Herbert) friendly to A Lynn's offensive scheme, and A Lynn is gone at the end of next year,
    where does that leave you? That also applies to Hurts.
    Agree BUT, Hurts is much more of a running QB than Herbert. He CAN run but looks more to pass.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X