Adelson pulls out of Raiders-Vegas

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lightningwill_420
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Faded blues View Post
    Raider president told the Las Vegas stadium coalition that they have private funded but refused to explain who and how.
    It makes sense, but it never entered my mind that there was a job title out there called Raider president. When I was a kid, I was never afraid of ghosts or monsters, but I bet I would have been terrified by Raider presidents.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faded blues
    replied
    Raider president told the Las Vegas stadium coalition that they have private funded but refused to explain who and how.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mister Hoarse
    replied
    Originally posted by obvious_idiot_bolt View Post
    the Red Herrings might be a good re-brand option, or the LA Flounders, with a cartoon-style spanos face on a fish body as the logo... or just use a pic of a spanos and no one will notice the difference.
    SC, we need your photoshop artistry...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mister Hoarse
    replied
    Originally posted by SDfan View Post
    it doesn't look that black & white to me. They experimented with holding TC in Carson back when the Home Depot stadium was still under construction and the practice fields and office trailers were in a big dirt lot surrounded by temporary chain link fencing. Why didn't they apply for relocation then? Their Mission Valley proposal went nowhere during the same timeframe. Deano had negotiations with AEG, but bailed out. He also had negotiations with Roski and bailed out. Then negotiations with Kroenke over Hollywood park, and again failed. He's had chances in SD, but wouldn't even engage in real negotiations- and again FAILED.

    It was reported he felt tremendous pressure to make a decision while the owners were meeting recently to discuss Vegas mostly- and then panicked when more help for SD never came up. It's clear the guy is not a confident, decisive leader of his own company and can't negotiate a deal to save his life and only reacts in panic mode. Rather than LA always being his end game- I think it was holding out to see who would give him the most free shit for as little investment and work on his part as he could get.. Apparently Faulconer & Roberts told him they already made their best offer and when he didn't immediately get more $ thrown his way by the NFL, he concluded being Kroenke's bitch was the best deal he was ever going to get without giving up anything in return and he reverted back to panic mode and took the LA option just to get it over with once and for all.
    Agree.
    And this is why the other owners will collectively wince while they allow him to fail.
    Spanos and Davis offer nothing to the elite corporates in the NFL. They are the two weakest links in the ownership chain.
    The main difference between them is Spanos always bends to whatever they want. Davis is still an outsider and always will be.
    The other significant difference is, while they ultimately want both of them out of the club, the Raider brand is much stronger than the Charger brand.
    That is still worth keeping, so they will keep squeezing Davis until he can no longer afford to hang onto his team.
    Spanos requires a different approach, get him into the big market and allow him to do what he was born to do, fail spectacularly.
    They can risk this because they have another owner with solid capital building the LA market for them.
    The Charger brand means less to the NFL than it meant to SD.
    Rebranding and or relocation could clean up the mess once Spanos is out.
    Grab some popcorn...

    Leave a comment:


  • RobH
    replied
    Originally posted by obvious_idiot_bolt View Post
    the Red Herrings might be a good re-brand option, or the LA Flounders, with a cartoon-style spanos face on a fish body as the logo... or just use a pic of a spanos and no one will notice the difference.
    Just use a picture of Deano wearing a beanie and call them the Beached Whales.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gwynning_Spirit
    replied
    the Red Herrings might be a good re-brand option, or the LA Flounders, with a cartoon-style spanos face on a fish body as the logo... or just use a pic of a spanos and no one will notice the difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • KNSD
    replied
    You could say that they would stay - on their terms - which was a higher price than voters would ever allow (and they knew that).

    Otherwise, the "Raiders/Vegas panic mode" scenario IMO is a red herring. Otherwise, the Spanos family would have waited until the following Tuesday to make the call - giving the NFL and others as much time as possible to get something done. They would have also left room for a return to San Diego instead of burning every single bridge on their way out.

    Leave a comment:


  • SDFan
    replied
    Originally posted by KNSD View Post
    The only time I've ever seen the Spanos family be decisive is in their efforts to get to LA.

    They announced their move to LA five days before they had to. They hit the ground running (actually tripping all over themselves) right when they announced the move. Then they terminated the Qualcomm lease as soon as they could.

    Their end game has always been LA - ever since they hired the former deputy mayor of LA, Fabiani.
    it doesn't look that black & white to me. They experimented with holding TC in Carson back when the Home Depot stadium was still under construction and the practice fields and office trailers were in a big dirt lot surrounded by temporary chain link fencing. Why didn't they apply for relocation then? Their Mission Valley proposal went nowhere during the same timeframe. Deano had negotiations with AEG, but bailed out. He also had negotiations with Roski and bailed out. Then negotiations with Kroenke over Hollywood park, and again failed. He's had chances in SD, but wouldn't even engage in real negotiations- and again FAILED.

    It was reported he felt tremendous pressure to make a decision while the owners were meeting recently to discuss Vegas mostly- and then panicked when more help for SD never came up. It's clear the guy is not a confident, decisive leader of his own company and can't negotiate a deal to save his life and only reacts in panic mode. Rather than LA always being his end game- I think it was holding out to see who would give him the most free shit for as little investment and work on his part as he could get.. Apparently Faulconer & Roberts told him they already made their best offer and when he didn't immediately get more $ thrown his way by the NFL, he concluded being Kroenke's bitch was the best deal he was ever going to get without giving up anything in return and he reverted back to panic mode and took the LA option just to get it over with once and for all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faded blues
    replied
    Originally posted by KNSD View Post
    The only time I've ever seen the Spanos family be decisive is in their efforts to get to LA.



    They announced their move to LA five days before they had to. They hit the ground running (actually tripping all over themselves) right when they announced the move. Then they terminated the Qualcomm lease as soon as they could.

    Their end game has always been LA - ever since they hired the former deputy mayor of LA, Fabiani.
    I agree completely.

    When dean took over for his dad is the day he wanted to go to la to sell the team.

    Leave a comment:


  • KNSD
    replied
    The only time I've ever seen the Spanos family be decisive is in their efforts to get to LA.

    They announced their move to LA five days before they had to. They hit the ground running (actually tripping all over themselves) right when they announced the move. Then they terminated the Qualcomm lease as soon as they could.

    Their end game has always been LA - ever since they hired the former deputy mayor of LA, Fabiani.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheels
    replied
    Originally posted by TTK View Post
    My conspiracy theory is that they're botching the LA thing so bad so that the NFL is going to let them sell and end this whole clown show that is making the whole league look stupid.
    LOL, My theory is they just can't run things without it turning into a shit show.

    Leave a comment:


  • TTK
    replied
    Originally posted by 6025 View Post
    Can't sell for seven years so that will be a long drought.
    My conspiracy theory is that they're botching the LA thing so bad so that the NFL is going to let them sell and end this whole clown show that is making the whole league look stupid.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X