We have a fire McCoy thread, so why not one dedicated to TT.
Firing of Chargers GM Tom Telesco unlikely
Collapse
X
-
I'd sooner keep Telesco than MehCoy. I'm not even sure I'd fire MehCoy, given that he's at least kept us in games, despite all the injuries. That being said, MehCoy's over-conservatism frustrates the hell out of me & sometimes makes Schottenheimer look like a riverboat gambler by comparison.
I agree with Acee that we are losing because we aren't physical enough on defense.
-Capt Obvious
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
-
-
Why don't they just say, both McCoy and Telesco are still under contract (at least for the 2016 season) and the spanos' family will just either roll the dice on having a lame duck staff for that year and start fresh in 2017...or man the fuck up and put people on the hot seat the rest of the season. Shape up or ship the fuck out.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by homeless simpson View PostWhy don't they just say, both McCoy and Telesco are still under contract (at least for the 2016 season) and the spanos' family will just either roll the dice on having a lame duck staff for that year and start fresh in 2017...or man the fuck up and put people on the hot seat the rest of the season. Shape up or ship the fuck out.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Spanos seems inclined toward continuity as the best course for future success, "
there's a shocker. And of course the track record proves the validity. Continuity of refusing to invest seriously in your trenches, continuity of hiring bargain head coaches, continuity of not replacing position coaches who are failures (Don Johnson, talking to you), continuity of pretending your QB alone will lead you to Super Bowls. Continuity of 7-9 win seasons with outliers to either extreme on occasion. Yeah, that's the winning formula from this winning organization.Life is too short to drink cheap beer :beer:
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SDfan View Post" It actually appears unlikely, based on conversations with three different sources familiar with the leanings of John Spanos, the Chargers’ president of football operations. Spanos seems inclined toward continuity as the best course for future success, "
there's a shocker. And of course the track record proves the validity. Continuity of refusing to invest seriously in your trenches, continuity of hiring bargain head coaches, continuity of not replacing position coaches who are failures (Don Johnson, talking to you), continuity of pretending your QB alone will lead you to Super Bowls. Continuity of 7-9 win seasons with outliers to either extreme on occasion. Yeah, that's the winning formula from this winning organization.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SDfan View Post" It actually appears unlikely, based on conversations with three different sources familiar with the leanings of John Spanos, the Chargers’ president of football operations. Spanos seems inclined toward continuity as the best course for future success, "
there's a shocker. And of course the track record proves the validity. Continuity of refusing to invest seriously in your trenches, continuity of hiring bargain head coaches, continuity of not replacing position coaches who are failures (Don Johnson, talking to you), continuity of pretending your QB alone will lead you to Super Bowls. Continuity of 7-9 win seasons with outliers to either extreme on occasion. Yeah, that's the winning formula from this winning organization.
This stadium thing is another. They slow-burned it for a decade. Now Kroenke has forced their hand, whether their objective is leverage with SD or cashing in on LA. But their big 'Carson' gambit with the Raiders is transparent, the city's maneuverings are actually more inspired and they didn't do the Moores thing of pushing all the chips into the pot with the on-field product to either get the citizenry pushing for it here in SD or clamoring for it in LA. They are idiots.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment