5 moves AFC West Teams need to make

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve
    Administrator
    • Jun 2013
    • 6841
    • South Carolina
    • Meteorologist
    • Send PM

    5 moves AFC West Teams need to make

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14...-offseason-nfl
    Bill Barnwell
    ESPN Staff Writer
    The NFL season ended less than two weeks ago, but teams are already beginning to make moves in advance of the new league year, and with the NFL combine sprouting up in Indianapolis next week, vacations are already over for many. In addition to the upcoming scouting bonanza, front offices are figuring out their free-agent plans and identifying which players they'll want to retain from their own rosters heading into the new league year on March 9.

    A good offseason, naturally, starts with a good beginning. That's where we come in. Teams like the Broncos and Panthers probably don't need our help, but that's never stopped us before. We've run division by division and detailed the five moves each NFL franchise should make to kick off its offseason in the right fashion. That can include anything from cutting a longtime contributor to making a big splash in free agency -- or, in some cases, staying out of the pool altogether.

    Some teams should be more active than others, so there are a few teams whose five moves extend all the way to draft day at the end of April. Other teams need to be more aggressive by the time the first day of free agency wraps up. Note that these moves aren't always in chronological order, even if they are the first five pressing decisions I've picked out. Finally, the advice is contained within its own world; multiple teams might be ideally interested in going after the same player, or a situation that might make sense for one organization wouldn't for the other.

    It's 32 teams, 32 universes. Here goes.

    AFC West

    The Broncos need to know Peyton Manning's retirement decision soon because Brock Osweiler is a free agent. Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
    Denver Broncos

    1. Franchise Von Miller. It would be nice if the Broncos could re-sign Miller and use the franchise tag on one of their other pending defensive free agents. But it seems as if general manager John Elway will follow the same path he most recently used in locking up Demaryius Thomas: The Broncos will use the franchise tag to ensure that Miller stays in town and eliminate some of his leverage before transitioning to a long-term extension.

    Truthfully, the Broncos could even franchise Miller a second time without too much pause; he should make around $13.5 million on the tag this year before getting $16.2 million if he's tagged a second time for the 2017 campaign. Compare that to somebody like Justin Houston, who has cap holds of $19.1 million and $20.6 million over the next two seasons. The Broncos know this, and Miller's side knows this, which is why a long-term deal will end up making sense for both parties.

    2. Move on from Peyton Manning and re-sign Brock Osweiler. Although the Broncos have suggested that they're showing respect to their Hall of Fame quarterback by letting him dwell upon his options before making any decisions, the reality is Denver really shouldn't expect to have Manning back under his current deal. Manning has a $21.5 million cap hit in 2016, making him the highest-paid player on the team by nearly $6 million over Thomas. Even the most fervent Manning supporter can't legitimately suggest that he's worth even close to that figure at this point in his career.

    The Broncos need to clear that money off of their cap to re-sign a number of younger unrestricted free agents, and, if they cut Manning, they would save a staggering $19 million in cap space. That's valuable for a team with $11.8 million to work with before signing any of those UFAs. Some of the money Denver saves on Peyton would unquestionably go to Osweiler, who showed promise before being benched in Week 17. The Broncos would surely rather re-sign Osweiler before he hits the free-agent market, which is why they need the cap space as soon as possible.

    3. Cut Ryan Clady. Although Denver needs to rebuild its offensive line, Clady probably is not going to be part of that solution. Injuries have held Clady to just 18 games over the past three years, and with a $10.1 million cap figure, the Broncos probably can't afford to wait around to see whether Clady is the same player after tearing his ACL before the season. The Broncos would save $8.9 million and could apply that to a new left tackle in what looks to be a rich pool of talent that includes Seahawks tackle Russell Okung.

    4. Re-sign Malik Jackson. The Broncos are going to be victims of their own success; three of the young starters on their league-best defense are about to become unrestricted free agents, and every franchise in the league just spent January watching what they could do. Teams around the NFL are drooling at the chance to sign Jackson, who excelled as a pass-rusher in concert with Miller and DeMarcus Ware.

    Jackson can point at the five-year, $51-million deal signed by Corey Liuget in San Diego and expect to get a better contract. That might just be too much for the Broncos to commit to, especially given that they just locked up fellow 3-4 end Derek Wolfe to a long-term deal last month. If the Broncos let Jackson walk, though, there will be no shortage of suitors.

    5. Let Danny Trevathan go. If the Broncos have to make a tough choice at defensive end, their choice at inside linebacker is clearer. As fun as it was for Broncos fans to see Trevathan develop from a sixth-round pick into a quality starting linebacker, Elway can't spend money everywhere, and the Broncos have been able to repeatedly develop unknown players into worthwhile contributors at inside linebacker. Given what Trevathan will be able to command on the open market, the Broncos will need to let him move on and commit their money elsewhere.

    Kansas City Chiefs

    1. Franchise Eric Berry. As with the Broncos, the Chiefs need to start their offseason by keeping a homegrown superstar around. Berry is one of the league's very best safeties, as he showed while coming back from leukemia this season. Kansas City GM John Dorsey has some tough decisions to make, but taking $10 million out to franchise Berry and eventually set up a long-term contract isn't really one of them. It's a must.

    2. Re-sign Sean Smith. With as many as six defensive starters in danger of leaving the team as unrestricted free agents this offseason, the Chiefs will need to pick and choose between their options. Smith is one of the players Dorsey needs to retain. Still just 28 and with the size (6-foot-3) to play aggressively at the line of scrimmage, Smith is the sort of corner teams are increasingly coveting. In fact, if Berry signs a long-term extension, the Chiefs might be able to justify franchising Smith to keep him from the market. Along with rookie Marcus Peters, Smith is a key component in one of the best cornerback combinations in football.

    3. Let Derrick Johnson, Tamba Hali and Mike DeVito leave. As brutal as it is to see longtime contributors leave, Dorsey needs to make a hard choice or two this offseason. Letting Hali go is an obvious decision, as the Chiefs have a replacement waiting in 2014 first-rounder Dee Ford.

    Johnson is tougher, if only because there's no obvious inside linebacker waiting to take his spot in the lineup. But as a 33-year-old with a torn Achilles in his recent past, Johnson is not a great bet to age well. The franchise tag treats all linebackers equally, so the $13.5 million or so Johnson would get with the franchise tag would be totally out of line with what even great inside linebackers get in their deals. Unless they can get him on a one- or two-year deal with a hometown discount, the Chiefs will need to save their money and invest it on younger players, such as defensive lineman Jaye Howard or guard Jeff Allen.

    4. Lock up Dontari Poe. Kansas City should extend this monster, too. Poe is one of the league's very best nose tackles, and even though he underwent back surgery last summer, the 25-year-old managed to make it back and play at a high level for most of the 2015 season. The Chiefs picked up his fifth-year option for $6.1 million this year, but they have to lock up their star tackle for the next several seasons.

    5. Sign a backup quarterback. The rumor mill has Chase Daniel following former Chiefs offensive coordinator Doug Pederson to Philadelphia, which would leave Kansas City in need of a backup behind Alex Smith. One interesting candidate would be Rams starter Nick Foles, who could return to work with Andy Reid if he's cut by Los Angeles, but Foles likely would cost more than the Chiefs would care to give. Given how accurate he looked in throwing short passes for the Cowboys this season, Brandon Weeden might make some sense as a low-cost veteran. Under any circumstances, the Chiefs will head into 2016 hoping Smith continues to stay healthy.

    Oakland Raiders

    1. Sign Kelechi Osemele. This is going to be a fun section. The Raiders have $72.8 million in projected cap space, a promising young core of talent and no real bad contracts to worry about. So they will just go on a spending spree. The one place GM Reggie McKenzie has consistently committed money to is the offensive line, so it would make sense for the Raiders to make a run at the best lineman on the market. Osemele could slot in at guard, but more likely, the Raiders would try him as their replacement for Donald Penn at left tackle.

    2. Sign Mario Williams. Assuming the Bills are going to release the 2006 No. 1 pick, Williams would be a good fit for the Raiders, who are losing Justin Tuck to retirement. They already have a monstrous pass-rusher in Khalil Mack, but there are concerns about the long-term health of 2015 second-rounder Mario Edwards, who has a "possibly genetic" issue with his neck that could jeopardize his long-term future. Even if Edwards can continue his career, the Raiders could get enough out of Williams as a three-down player to justify giving him a hefty salary on a two- or three-year deal.

    3. Sign Eric Weddle. With Charles Woodson retiring, the Raiders are in need of a playmaker and veteran leader in their defensive backfield. No player on the market fits that better than Weddle, who would enjoy the added benefit of getting to suit up twice a year against the same Chargers organization that seems hell-bent on running him out of town. If the Raiders want to skew younger, a move for Browns ball hawk Tashaun Gipson would make sense.

    4. Sign a cornerback. Although the Raiders were able to get surprisingly effective play out of Washington castoff David Amerson last year, it's probably not a good sign that they needed to turn to a player who was cut at midseason for meaningful snaps less than two weeks later. The jury is still out on 2013 first-rounder D.J. Hayden, and the Raiders could use a viable No. 1 cornerback to make everybody's job a little easier. In terms of finances, they'll be able to outbid anybody on the market if there's somebody McKenzie loves. The aforementioned Sean Smith, Prince Amukamara and Janoris Jenkins are all in play. And if Josh Norman somehow becomes a free agent, the Raiders should offer to build a statue of Norman outside the stadium as part of their package. (Concrete, of course.) And hey, Norman would get to hang out with Stephen Curry in Oakland.

    5. Sign Terrance Knighton. Last year, when it seemed a fait accompli that the Raiders would add Knighton to play under former defensive coordinator Jack del Rio, they went in a different direction and signed Dan Williams. Knighton's market never materialized, and he signed a one-year deal with Washington. If that happens again, it might make sense for a reunion, given that the Raiders would be able to rotate Knighton and Williams as part of a rotation on the interior. All it would take is money, and the Raiders have plenty of it to spend.

    San Diego Chargers
    1. Cut Donald Brown. One of the lesser running backs in the league since joining San Diego, Brown has averaged just 3.1 yards per carry as a member of the Chargers while getting Mike Scifres hurt in punt protection. San Diego would save $3.5 million by moving on from the 2009 first-round pick by Indianapolis, and, with Brown buried on the depth chart, it seems like an obvious call.

    2. Build contract extensions for Keenan Allen and Melvin Ingram. The Chargers don't have much of a young core to go around Philip Rivers, but they appear to have difference-makers on either side of the football. Allen had 67 catches for 725 yards in just eight games last season, and Ingram broke out with 10.5 sacks, including 6.5 over his final five games. The only concern with these two budding stars would be injuries: Allen has never finished a full 16-game season, and Ingram missed 19 games between 2013 and 2014.

    3. Re-sign Antonio Gates. You could make a case that a struggling team such as San Diego has better things to do with its money than give an oft-injured 35-year-old tight end a new contract, even if it's a player as gifted as Gates. At the same time, though, don't the fans deserve a break after the embarrassing way they were treated this past season? After Ladarius Green failed to develop, there's not an obvious replacement for Gates on the roster. A two-year deal for this Chargers legend might actually give the fans something to cherish.

    4. Take a flier on a replacement for Malcom Floyd. With another longtime San Diego receiver leaving, Mike McCoy and returning offensive coordinator Ken Whisenhunt are left with a hole in their receiving corps across from Allen and Stevie Johnson, neither of whom is guaranteed to stay healthy. There's not a No. 1 wideout on the market, but the Chargers would do well to bring in a veteran to challenge for snaps, given that the rest of their lineup at wide receiver consists of undrafted free agents. A high-ceiling option such as Brian Quick would make sense.

    5. Draft a replacement for Eric Weddle. With the franchise having run off one of its most popular players, the Chargers will need to find a long-term option at free safety. Although there's a deep class of candidates available in free agency, they're probably better off waiting until the draft and bringing in a younger talent who can develop alongside Jason Verrett in their defensive backfield.
    Some interesting points about this.

    Denver
    Any interest in Clady, given our need at OL?

    KC
    Adding Hali as a situational pass rusher would allow us to move Ingram inside/around on passing downs. He can also still play effectively vs the run in the base D, as long as you don't overdo his snap count at his age.

    Oakland
    resign Terrance Knighton? The guy played at over 400 lbs last year and was completely ineffective. He looked like he was on roller skates most of the year. I can't see anyone giving him a chance again, considering how little interest there was in him last year.

    Sigining Weddle is a thing I could see. It would allow Weddle to show us how mad he is at us, and he can make a bunch of money in the process. He is also the kind of player the Raiders love to waste money on.

    SD
    I don't think you cut Brown because he can't play. He plays fine, or as fine as a RB can behind our sieve of an OL. You cut him because he is being well paid for a RB and he is so far down on the depth chart he isn't a sure thing to be active. It's a salary cap thing, not a field thing.

    I don't know about extending Ingram yet. I would like to see him cut down on his mental mistakes before we commit more money. He is developing now that he is finally staying on the field, but he needs to stop playing like a rookie.

    I don't mind Green, but we really need another true TE, not another WR type. Gates is fine as a WR type of TE, and is actually a good downfield blocker. Green is going to be offered a ton of money by some team that wants a speed TE who can split S and run past the MLB in cover 2. We have just proven that we cannot find a way to get 2 pass catching TE on the field at the same time without killing our own running game.
  • Lightningwill_420

    #2
    Uh. The moves suggested by the writer would give us the same team we had last year. 4-12.

    Comment

    • Formula 21
      The Future is Now
      • Jun 2013
      • 16397
      • Republic of San Diego
      • Send PM

      #3
      Can the Bolts have 15 moves please?
      Now, if you excuse me, I have some Charger memories to suppress.
      The Wasted Decade is done.
      Build Back Better.

      Comment

      • Lightningwill_420

        #4
        I don't know what the right moves are, but I know going with what we had last year is the wrong move. The O line needs drastic changes and the D line has needed drastic changes for about 5 years. If we stick with what we got, then we can expect the same results.

        Comment

        • Steve
          Administrator
          • Jun 2013
          • 6841
          • South Carolina
          • Meteorologist
          • Send PM

          #5
          I think he was going for more of a top 5 moves. This same author has pointed to how putrid our OL has been. That is why I was so suprised he brought up Browns production.

          Still, since he was lumping draft and FA, the OL thing is kinda obvious.

          Comment

          • Lightningwill_420

            #6
            Originally posted by Steve View Post
            I think he was going for more of a top 5 moves. This same author has pointed to how putrid our OL has been. That is why I was so suprised he brought up Browns production.

            Still, since he was lumping draft and FA, the OL thing is kinda obvious.
            Obviously not top 5, according to the writer.

            Comment

            • SDFan
              Woober Goober
              • Jun 2013
              • 4001
              • Dolores, CO
              • Retired
              • Send PM

              #7
              Originally posted by Steve View Post
              Some interesting points about this.

              Denver
              Any interest in Clady, given our need at OL?

              KC
              Adding Hali as a situational pass rusher would allow us to move Ingram inside/around on passing downs. He can also still play effectively vs the run in the base D, as long as you don't overdo his snap count at his age.

              Oakland
              resign Terrance Knighton? The guy played at over 400 lbs last year and was completely ineffective. He looked like he was on roller skates most of the year. I can't see anyone giving him a chance again, considering how little interest there was in him last year.

              Sigining Weddle is a thing I could see. It would allow Weddle to show us how mad he is at us, and he can make a bunch of money in the process. He is also the kind of player the Raiders love to waste money on.

              SD
              I don't think you cut Brown because he can't play. He plays fine, or as fine as a RB can behind our sieve of an OL. You cut him because he is being well paid for a RB and he is so far down on the depth chart he isn't a sure thing to be active. It's a salary cap thing, not a field thing.

              I don't know about extending Ingram yet. I would like to see him cut down on his mental mistakes before we commit more money. He is developing now that he is finally staying on the field, but he needs to stop playing like a rookie.

              I don't mind Green, but we really need another true TE, not another WR type. Gates is fine as a WR type of TE, and is actually a good downfield blocker. Green is going to be offered a ton of money by some team that wants a speed TE who can split S and run past the MLB in cover 2. We have just proven that we cannot find a way to get 2 pass catching TE on the field at the same time without killing our own running game.
              are the salary numbers right on DBrown? I thought I read somewhere that because he was cut, then resigned there was some change to the contract structure? Also, I think it's incorrect to say Green never developed- it's that they have never TRIED or allowed him to develop. He's been stuck behind Gates his entire career and they won't ever let him play a full season out of Gates's shadow and Rivers (and NOrv, McCoy + our OCs) lean on Gates too much like a crutch even when he's not healthy and obviously has slowed down a bunch by age. He produced well last year during Gates 4 game suspension and they should have stuck with him. Ghelkin has an article the team is already talking about giving Gates another contract at age 36 and how we have nothing else at TE because they are all FAs and have to revamp the TE corps before next year. If it was me, I'd pass on Gates for now and re-sign Green and promise him the starting job is his to lose. It's gonna suck watching Green bust out and make Pro Bowls on another team while Gates limps through another season with mediocre numbers on his way to retiring.
              Life is too short to drink cheap beer :beer:

              Comment

              • Lightningwill_420

                #8
                I say fuck the the tight end position. Fix the O-line and the defense. When we start playing like a real team, we can worry about tight end.

                Comment

                • Formula 21
                  The Future is Now
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 16397
                  • Republic of San Diego
                  • Send PM

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Engine Engine Number 420 View Post
                  I say fuck the the tight end position. Fix the O-line and the defense. When we start playing like a real team, we can worry about tight end.
                  That's my preferred position with tight ends too.
                  Now, if you excuse me, I have some Charger memories to suppress.
                  The Wasted Decade is done.
                  Build Back Better.

                  Comment

                  • Lightningwill_420

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Formula Two One View Post
                    That's my preferred position with tight ends too.
                    I support your right to your own lifestyle. Chargers need blockers and tacklers though.

                    Comment

                    • Steve
                      Administrator
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 6841
                      • South Carolina
                      • Meteorologist
                      • Send PM

                      #11
                      Originally posted by SDfan View Post
                      are the salary numbers right on DBrown? I thought I read somewhere that because he was cut, then resigned there was some change to the contract structure? Also, I think it's incorrect to say Green never developed- it's that they have never TRIED or allowed him to develop. He's been stuck behind Gates his entire career and they won't ever let him play a full season out of Gates's shadow and Rivers (and NOrv, McCoy + our OCs) lean on Gates too much like a crutch even when he's not healthy and obviously has slowed down a bunch by age. He produced well last year during Gates 4 game suspension and they should have stuck with him. Ghelkin has an article the team is already talking about giving Gates another contract at age 36 and how we have nothing else at TE because they are all FAs and have to revamp the TE corps before next year. If it was me, I'd pass on Gates for now and re-sign Green and promise him the starting job is his to lose. It's gonna suck watching Green bust out and make Pro Bowls on another team while Gates limps through another season with mediocre numbers on his way to retiring.
                      We owe Brown a lot, but again, even if we owed him little or nothing, I would probably cut him. Not that he is a bad player, just we have 3 better ones in front of him.

                      As far as the TE position, you have to have a TE who can block if you want to run the ball, especially on the goalline. You cannot run offtackle or outside without one. You just cannot block everyone and having defenders run free, .... well, we have seen that up close the last 2 years. We have to at least resign some FA to even fill out our roster. It is not a matter of not having TE we like, we literally only have UDFA types on our roster.

                      We can sign Darryl Young when the Redskins release him, and that would give us a FB, which means we could carry 1 less TE. But we would still need at least a couple more just to fill out the roster. After that we have to decide between Gates and Green. Green has the physical tools, but it developing as a route runner painfully slowly. He is a marginal blocker, but that is still better then the NFL average. He is one of the fastest TE in football, which is why someone will pay him.

                      There is a reason that our OC keep leaning on Gates. He may not have any speed or explosiveness left, but he is still one of the best route runners in NFL history. That is a skill that doesn't go away. Plus, I think the idea is to get back to ball control football, and if it is, then having Rivers to Gates dink and dunk down the field makes our O a time consuming machine (provide we can find some OL).

                      Comment

                      • pigskin
                        Registered Charger Fan
                        • Jun 2013
                        • 404
                        • Southern Oregon
                        • Send PM

                        #12
                        What about letting Green walk and sign Dwyne Allen TE (INDY) he is a very good blocker and an avg pass catcher.
                        Last edited by pigskin; 02-21-2016, 03:24 PM.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X