2024 Draft Depth by Position

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cdn Bolt
    Registered Charger Fan
    • Jan 2019
    • 624
    • Ontario , Canada
    • Send PM

    2024 Draft Depth by Position

    FYI Here is my quick study again of how the top 3 rounds could look like based on supply and demand with each column explained below.

    Available : I took the top 96 players per CBS rankings big board for the top 3 rounds and summed them for each position. ie there are 19 WR in the top 96 players

    Need : I took the top 3 needs for each team per Draftek and summed them to get the "Need' total for the position. ie 14 teams have WR as a need

    Extra: I then subtracted Available- Need to get a view of the depth for each position. ie 5 extra WR


    Lots of WR and OT as many have said it is a deep draft for both so we could get one need in each of the 1st 2 rnds. In shorter supply are Edge rushers, DL and IOL. But at 5 under the new regime it will be BPA so WR or OT likely. Hope this jives w what the mocks are showing.



    image.png
  • dmac_bolt
    Day Tripper
    • May 2019
    • 10546
    • North of the Lagoon
    • Send PM

    #2
    Originally posted by Cdn Bolt View Post
    FYI Here is my quick study again of how the top 3 rounds could look like based on supply and demand with each column explained below.

    Available : I took the top 96 players per CBS rankings big board for the top 3 rounds and summed them for each position. ie there are 19 WR in the top 96 players

    Need : I took the top 3 needs for each team per Draftek and summed them to get the "Need' total for the position. ie 14 teams have WR as a need

    Extra: I then subtracted Available- Need to get a view of the depth for each position. ie 5 extra WR


    Lots of WR and OT as many have said it is a deep draft for both so we could get one need in each of the 1st 2 rnds. In shorter supply are Edge rushers, DL and IOL. But at 5 under the new regime it will be BPA so WR or OT likely. Hope this jives w what the mocks are showing.



    image.png
    your chart tells me to take your DT early if you need one, am I reading it wrong?
    “Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”

    Comment

    • Cdn Bolt
      Registered Charger Fan
      • Jan 2019
      • 624
      • Ontario , Canada
      • Send PM

      #3
      Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post

      your chart tells me to take your DT early if you need one, am I reading it wrong?
      No that is right. But BPA at 5 will be a WR or OT - so I dont think they will reach for a DT at 5. So we may miss out on a DT.

      If they trade down though DT is possible w the extra #1 IMO.

      Comment

      • Boltjolt
        Dont let the PBs fool ya
        • Jun 2013
        • 26850
        • Henderson, NV
        • Send PM

        #4
        Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post

        your chart tells me to take your DT early if you need one, am I reading it wrong?
        Thats why in my mock i have IOL and DT early .

        Comment

        • Fleet 1
          TPB Founder
          • Jun 2013
          • 2231
          • Kauai
          • Send PM

          #5
          Updated Chart

          Screen Shot 2024-04-17 at 8.33.41 AM.png

          Comment

          • La Costa Boy
            Pretty much retired......
            • Sep 2018
            • 3090
            • JoJa
            • Bloviator of hot air and rhetoric.
            • Send PM

            #6
            Fiske in round 2 for that DL dilemma.

            Comment

            Working...
            X