For the record, Woodhead ain't Sproles. I have heard so many people saying that he gives us what we lost in Sproles and I found that laughable. So far, I don't see him as being that big an improvement over Brown.
Ronnie Brown
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Den60 View PostFor the record, Woodhead ain't Sproles. I have heard so many people saying that he gives us what we lost in Sproles and I found that laughable. So far, I don't see him as being that big an improvement over Brown.ESPN Screename: GoBolts02
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltx View PostOh I agree. I don't know who made that comparison.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Den60 View PostI'm not saying anyone on here has, though there has been an emphasis on his effect on the offense by some here. I just don't see a heckuva lot of talent there. He's relatively quick but not near as quick as Sproles. He doesn't have size or speed either. I just heard so many saying what a big part of the offense he would be. If that was the case you'd have thought we'd see more of him on Monday night.
"more emphasis on the running game" + Danny pass catching weapon = more snaps for Ronnie Brown?
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beerman View PostBrown played 48 snaps, or 91% of plays.
I don't mean just being on the field. Bird was just on the field but obviously nowhere near ready to be. Same with Geathers. Same with Marshall. RB just happens to be deep and a singular position.Hashtag thepowderblues
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment