And the winners are...

[Panama]

Fuck no. lol. If he does it just means weve lost Keenan.

Let me amend my wager then. I will wager money that of our top 3 WRs, the only one who might miss a game to injury is Eddie Royal. Takers?

[Maverick]

So the article is saying that in practice none of our 5'9" CB can stop 6'5" Floyd .

lol, was thinking the same thing

still not sure how this "smurf secondary" is going to hold up against the new basketball-player-prototype WRs in the league

yet, in TT I trust!

[SDFan]

So the article is saying that in practice none of our 5'9" CB can stop 6'5" Floyd .

nice spin job, but read it again: "There wasn't a cornerback who faced him that Floyd failed to roast once."

it only says he beat each guy ONCE- not every time, or even most the time or consistently....

[ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR]

No, you are actually and factually incorrect. When calculating the parallel transitional options in sports injuries to individuals with varying degrees of bulk, size, mass, etc, one must include a categorized and systemised strategic mobility
paradigm, which in turn allow the inclusion of three-dimensional strategic concepts allowing one to utilize deconstructed strategic matrix approaches which can not only assist in diagnosing the injury probability of a given subject, but
along with holistic incremental consulting, can determine the synchronised mobility values, interactive management mobility, regenerated modular time-phases, and lastly, the organized regenerational flexibility of said subject.

Obviously you either didn't read or understand what was written. I question your intelligence and reading comprehension skills. I've looked at your analytical approach and find it foolish and utterly devoid of merit. It amounts to a pile of bupkus. The usage of all of those "matrix transitional comparative strategic concepts" is hardly probative.

I did an analysis which is inherently superior because I am the one who undertook it. If you look at the body mass index (BMI) of every player who has turned an ankle in the last three years in the NFL, CFL and Arena Leagues and divide that by an "Injury Severity Factor" (ISF) that I have imputed using my own gut level biases based upon reports in USA Today, you will see that larger bodied players tend to sustain less severe ankle injuries than smaller bodied ones. This would at first blush seem counterintuitive, as larger massed players obviously fall to the ground at a faster rate than smaller ones (I discount some of the conventional wisdom in the physics community on the effect of gravity on mass, but that is for another thread). However, this analysis ignores the impact of the velocity of players as they run down the field. When one factors velocity into the equation, it becomes clear that this overwhelms the impact of gravity, thus causing the smaller player to fall at a faster rate and to therefore injure himself far more extensively then the beefier players. Moreover, I have determined the hand size of the smaller players vs the larger players and, surprise, smaller players' hands tend to be smaller than the larger players! This means that smaller players cannot brace their falls as effectively as larger players and thus cannot protect themselves against injury as effectively as bigger guys.

If after reading this, you still are not persuaded as to the superiority of my argument then you are blind to absolute facts and are unworthy of posting on the same message board as me. Good day, sir.

[Guest]

Obviously you either didn't read or understand what was written. I question your intelligence and reading comprehension skills. I've looked at your analytical approach and find it foolish and utterly devoid of merit. It amounts to a pile of bupkus. The usage of all of those "matrix transitional comparative strategic concepts" is hardly probative.

I did an analysis which is inherently superior because I am the one who undertook it. If you look at the body mass index (BMI) of every player who has turned an ankle in the last three years in the NFL, CFL and Arena Leagues and divide that by an "Injury Severity Factor" (ISF) that I have imputed using my own gut level biases based upon reports in USA Today, you will see that larger bodied players tend to sustain less severe ankle injuries than smaller bodied ones. This would at first blush seem counterintuitive, as larger massed players obviously fall to the ground at a faster rate than smaller ones (I discount some of the conventional wisdom in the physics community on the effect of gravity on mass, but that is for another thread). However, this analysis ignores the impact of the velocity of players as they run down the field. When one factors velocity into the equation, it becomes clear that this overwhelms the impact of gravity, thus causing the smaller player to fall at a faster rate and to therefore injure himself far more extensively then the beefier players. Moreover, I have determined the hand size of the smaller players vs the larger players and, surprise, smaller players' hands tend to be smaller than the larger players! This means that smaller players cannot brace their falls as effectively as larger players and thus cannot protect themselves against injury as effectively as bigger guys.

If after reading this, you still are not persuaded as to the superiority of my argument then you are blind to absolute facts and are unworthy of posting on the same message board as me. Good day, sir.

[MakoShark]

Obviously you either didn't read or understand what was written. I question your intelligence and reading comprehension skills. I've looked at your analytical approach and find it foolish and utterly devoid of merit. It amounts to a pile of bupkus. The usage of all of those "matrix transitional comparative strategic concepts" is hardly probative.

I did an analysis which is inherently superior because I am the one who undertook it. If you look at the body mass index (BMI) of every player who has turned an ankle in the last three years in the NFL, CFL and Arena Leagues and divide that by an "Injury Severity Factor" (ISF) that I have imputed using my own gut level biases based upon reports in USA Today, you will see that larger bodied players tend to sustain less severe ankle injuries than smaller bodied ones. This would at first blush seem counterintuitive, as larger massed players obviously fall to the ground at a faster rate than smaller ones (I discount some of the conventional wisdom in the physics community on the effect of gravity on mass, but that is for another thread). However, this analysis ignores the impact of the velocity of players as they run down the field. When one factors velocity into the equation, it becomes clear that this overwhelms the impact of gravity, thus causing the smaller player to fall at a faster rate and to therefore injure himself far more extensively then the beefier players. Moreover, I have determined the hand size of the smaller players vs the larger players and, surprise, smaller players' hands tend to be smaller than the larger players! This means that smaller players cannot brace their falls as effectively as larger players and thus cannot protect themselves against injury as effectively as bigger guys.

If after reading this, you still are not persuaded as to the superiority of my argument then you are blind to absolute facts and are unworthy of posting on the same message board as me. Good day, sir.

You forgot the part about planet alignment and how moon beams affect your algorithm for night games.

[ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR]

You forgot the part about planet alignment and how moon beams affect your algorithm for night games.

Don't mock me!!!

[ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR]

He's quite small. So the likelihood of injury is higher. he better watch that finger.

[rikardo]

nice spin job, but read it again: "There wasn't a cornerback who faced him that Floyd failed to roast once."

it only says he beat each guy ONCE- not every time, or even most the time or consistently....

I was not serious.
I know that when Floyd is healthy he's a great WR.
It should be a fun season if we can have Allen and (Floyd and Royal at least 85% of a healthy season)…

[Panama]

You forgot the part about planet alignment and how moon beams affect your algorithm for night games.

Only in the Bay Area.

[Yubaking]

Fortunately Floyd is big so we don't need to worry about ankle problems.

Okay, not to nitpick, but I think my statement would have been that fortunately Floyd is bigger than other WRs so he should be able to withstand contact better than them.

Damn, that didn't work at all for me, did it?!

Can someone give me a porcelain doll Floyd Logo?

[Mister Hoarse]

He's quite small. So the likelihood of injury is higher. he better watch that finger.

Johnny Finger logo:

*butt where has it been logo: