And the winners are...

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Panama
    パナマ
    • Aug 2013
    • 5335
    • London
    • Opera singer and web developer.
    • Send PM

    #25
    Originally posted by Fleet View Post
    Fuck no. lol. If he does it just means weve lost Keenan.
    Let me amend my wager then. I will wager money that of our top 3 WRs, the only one who might miss a game to injury is Eddie Royal. Takers?
    Adipose

    Comment

    • Maverick
      (Coryellian)
      • Jun 2013
      • 1256
      • Point Loma
      • Send PM

      #26
      Originally posted by rikardo View Post
      So the article is saying that in practice none of our 5'9" CB can stop 6'5" Floyd .
      lol, was thinking the same thing

      still not sure how this "smurf secondary" is going to hold up against the new basketball-player-prototype WRs in the league

      yet, in TT I trust!

      Comment

      • SDFan
        Woober Goober
        • Jun 2013
        • 4000
        • Dolores, CO
        • Retired
        • Send PM

        #27
        Originally posted by rikardo View Post
        So the article is saying that in practice none of our 5'9" CB can stop 6'5" Floyd .
        nice spin job, but read it again: "There wasn't a cornerback who faced him that Floyd failed to roast once."

        it only says he beat each guy ONCE- not every time, or even most the time or consistently....
        Life is too short to drink cheap beer :beer:

        Comment

        • ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR
          Registered Charger Fan
          • Jun 2013
          • 7310
          • Send PM

          #28
          Originally posted by SuperCharger View Post
          No, you are actually and factually incorrect. When calculating the parallel transitional options in sports injuries to individuals with varying degrees of bulk, size, mass, etc, one must include a categorized and systemised strategic mobility
          paradigm, which in turn allow the inclusion of three-dimensional strategic concepts allowing one to utilize deconstructed strategic matrix approaches which can not only assist in diagnosing the injury probability of a given subject, but
          along with holistic incremental consulting, can determine the synchronised mobility values, interactive management mobility, regenerated modular time-phases, and lastly, the organized regenerational flexibility of said subject.
          Obviously you either didn't read or understand what was written. I question your intelligence and reading comprehension skills. I've looked at your analytical approach and find it foolish and utterly devoid of merit. It amounts to a pile of bupkus. The usage of all of those "matrix transitional comparative strategic concepts" is hardly probative.

          I did an analysis which is inherently superior because I am the one who undertook it. If you look at the body mass index (BMI) of every player who has turned an ankle in the last three years in the NFL, CFL and Arena Leagues and divide that by an "Injury Severity Factor" (ISF) that I have imputed using my own gut level biases based upon reports in USA Today, you will see that larger bodied players tend to sustain less severe ankle injuries than smaller bodied ones. This would at first blush seem counterintuitive, as larger massed players obviously fall to the ground at a faster rate than smaller ones (I discount some of the conventional wisdom in the physics community on the effect of gravity on mass, but that is for another thread). However, this analysis ignores the impact of the velocity of players as they run down the field. When one factors velocity into the equation, it becomes clear that this overwhelms the impact of gravity, thus causing the smaller player to fall at a faster rate and to therefore injure himself far more extensively then the beefier players. Moreover, I have determined the hand size of the smaller players vs the larger players and, surprise, smaller players' hands tend to be smaller than the larger players! This means that smaller players cannot brace their falls as effectively as larger players and thus cannot protect themselves against injury as effectively as bigger guys.

          If after reading this, you still are not persuaded as to the superiority of my argument then you are blind to absolute facts and are unworthy of posting on the same message board as me. Good day, sir.
          Last edited by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR; 08-20-2014, 07:08 AM.

          Comment

          • Guest

            #29
            Originally posted by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR View Post
            Obviously you either didn't read or understand what was written. I question your intelligence and reading comprehension skills. I've looked at your analytical approach and find it foolish and utterly devoid of merit. It amounts to a pile of bupkus. The usage of all of those "matrix transitional comparative strategic concepts" is hardly probative.

            I did an analysis which is inherently superior because I am the one who undertook it. If you look at the body mass index (BMI) of every player who has turned an ankle in the last three years in the NFL, CFL and Arena Leagues and divide that by an "Injury Severity Factor" (ISF) that I have imputed using my own gut level biases based upon reports in USA Today, you will see that larger bodied players tend to sustain less severe ankle injuries than smaller bodied ones. This would at first blush seem counterintuitive, as larger massed players obviously fall to the ground at a faster rate than smaller ones (I discount some of the conventional wisdom in the physics community on the effect of gravity on mass, but that is for another thread). However, this analysis ignores the impact of the velocity of players as they run down the field. When one factors velocity into the equation, it becomes clear that this overwhelms the impact of gravity, thus causing the smaller player to fall at a faster rate and to therefore injure himself far more extensively then the beefier players. Moreover, I have determined the hand size of the smaller players vs the larger players and, surprise, smaller players' hands tend to be smaller than the larger players! This means that smaller players cannot brace their falls as effectively as larger players and thus cannot protect themselves against injury as effectively as bigger guys.

            If after reading this, you still are not persuaded as to the superiority of my argument then you are blind to absolute facts and are unworthy of posting on the same message board as me. Good day, sir.

            Comment

            • MakoShark
              Still Lurking Around.
              • Jun 2013
              • 2876
              • North Alabama
              • Send PM

              #30
              Originally posted by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR View Post
              Obviously you either didn't read or understand what was written. I question your intelligence and reading comprehension skills. I've looked at your analytical approach and find it foolish and utterly devoid of merit. It amounts to a pile of bupkus. The usage of all of those "matrix transitional comparative strategic concepts" is hardly probative.

              I did an analysis which is inherently superior because I am the one who undertook it. If you look at the body mass index (BMI) of every player who has turned an ankle in the last three years in the NFL, CFL and Arena Leagues and divide that by an "Injury Severity Factor" (ISF) that I have imputed using my own gut level biases based upon reports in USA Today, you will see that larger bodied players tend to sustain less severe ankle injuries than smaller bodied ones. This would at first blush seem counterintuitive, as larger massed players obviously fall to the ground at a faster rate than smaller ones (I discount some of the conventional wisdom in the physics community on the effect of gravity on mass, but that is for another thread). However, this analysis ignores the impact of the velocity of players as they run down the field. When one factors velocity into the equation, it becomes clear that this overwhelms the impact of gravity, thus causing the smaller player to fall at a faster rate and to therefore injure himself far more extensively then the beefier players. Moreover, I have determined the hand size of the smaller players vs the larger players and, surprise, smaller players' hands tend to be smaller than the larger players! This means that smaller players cannot brace their falls as effectively as larger players and thus cannot protect themselves against injury as effectively as bigger guys.

              If after reading this, you still are not persuaded as to the superiority of my argument then you are blind to absolute facts and are unworthy of posting on the same message board as me. Good day, sir.
              You forgot the part about planet alignment and how moon beams affect your algorithm for night games.
              sigpic

              Comment

              • ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR
                Registered Charger Fan
                • Jun 2013
                • 7310
                • Send PM

                #31
                Originally posted by MakoShark View Post
                You forgot the part about planet alignment and how moon beams affect your algorithm for night games.
                Don't mock me!!!

                Comment

                • ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR
                  Registered Charger Fan
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 7310
                  • Send PM

                  #32
                  Originally posted by SuperCharger View Post
                  He's quite small. So the likelihood of injury is higher. he better watch that finger.

                  Comment

                  • rikardo
                    Registered Charger Fan
                    • Jun 2013
                    • 1027
                    • Send PM

                    #33
                    Originally posted by SDfan View Post
                    nice spin job, but read it again: "There wasn't a cornerback who faced him that Floyd failed to roast once."

                    it only says he beat each guy ONCE- not every time, or even most the time or consistently....
                    I was not serious.
                    I know that when Floyd is healthy he's a great WR.
                    It should be a fun season if we can have Allen and (Floyd and Royal at least 85% of a healthy season)…
                    Last edited by rikardo; 08-20-2014, 08:50 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Panama
                      パナマ
                      • Aug 2013
                      • 5335
                      • London
                      • Opera singer and web developer.
                      • Send PM

                      #34
                      Originally posted by MakoShark View Post
                      You forgot the part about planet alignment and how moon beams affect your algorithm for night games.
                      Only in the Bay Area.
                      Adipose

                      Comment

                      • Yubaking
                        Registered Charger Fan
                        • Jul 2013
                        • 3661
                        • Send PM

                        #35
                        Originally posted by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR View Post
                        Fortunately Floyd is big so we don't need to worry about ankle problems.
                        Okay, not to nitpick, but I think my statement would have been that fortunately Floyd is bigger than other WRs so he should be able to withstand contact better than them.

                        Damn, that didn't work at all for me, did it?!

                        Can someone give me a porcelain doll Floyd Logo?

                        Comment

                        • Mister Hoarse
                          No Sir, I Dont Like It
                          • Jun 2013
                          • 10266
                          • Section 457
                          • Migrant Film Worker
                          • Send PM

                          #36
                          Originally posted by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR View Post
                          He's quite small. So the likelihood of injury is higher. he better watch that finger.
                          Johnny Finger logo:

                          *butt where has it been logo:
                          Dean Spanos Should Get Ass Cancer Of The Ass!
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          Working...