2020 TPB Charger’s Draft Prediction Game

[Boltjolt]

Cero chance next years #1 pick is traded cero.
Lawrence is that good.
No owner would allow a GM to do that.

Depends on who has the pick. Cant rule out anything right now and maybe the team picking 1st dont need a QB. Never know what can happen.

[rikardo]

I don't think you should say zero chance... but I agree that it is highly unlikely as usually the team with the worst record needs a franchise QB... but there are times when a team has a young, studly QB who gets hurt early in the season and still sees that player as their QB of the future. That kind of team would likely want to cash in on the Lawrence sweepstakes. All that being said... I like BoltJolt's idea of trading down if Simmons is off the board and then drafting Hurts.... I rate Hurts a lot higher than others do.

ZERO CHANCE
or you have not seen Lawrence play

[rikardo]

Depends on who has it. Cant rule out anything right now.

Ok, since I have time. Friendly argument...

Honestly only KC would be the only team that could pass on Lawrence.

But the possibilities of KC having the #1 pick next year are so close to zero...

All other team should trade there starting QB (if they could) and draft Lawrence with there eyes close

[Boltjolt]

Ok, since I have time.

Honestly only KC would be the only team that could pass on Lawrence.

But the possibilities of KC having the #1 pick next year are so close to zero...

All other team should trade there starting QB and draft Lawrence

Well cmon now, i like Lawrence but he isnt the best QB prospect ever...lol. He wasnt particularly great his last 2 games. Sorry dont agree. I dont even think the Ravens would trade Lamar to draft him.

[rikardo]

Well cmon now, i like Lawrence but he isnt the best QB prospect ever...lol. He wasnt particularly great his last 2 games. Sorry dont agree. I dont even think the Ravens would trade Lamar to draft him.

Dont know where he will rank all time, but I know he will be in the argument (best QB prospect ever), at least that's what I expect.
And Lamar over Lawrence really? in a scenario where Ravens have the #1 pick its because Lamar got a season ending injury, Or Lamar downgraded his game. in that scenario you keep Lamar over Lawrence?

[Critty]

Im going out on limbs.

1.Jeudy-WR, Alabama
2.Hurts-QB, Oklahoma
3.Biadasz-OC, Wisconsin
4.RobinsonII-CB, Tulsa
5.Keene-TE, Virginia Tech
6.Kindley-OG, Georgia
7.Hawkins-S, California

:cartman:

[Boltjolt]

Dont know where he will rank all time, but I know he will be in the argument (best QB prospect ever), at least that's what I expect.
And Lamar over Lawrence really? in a scenario where Ravens have the #1 pick its because Lamar got a season ending injury, Or Lamar downgraded his game. in that scenario you keep Lamar over Lawrence?

Yes really. Lamar has made big strides and fits their system, is young with NFL experience. Why would they trade Lamar to draft Lawrence? That's actually crazy.

I think you are over rating Lawrence a little.
I mean I like him but geez. Not sure he would even be the first pick from 2004 draft or over Luck.

[mecho]

Here is mine

1st Justin Simmons LB
2nd Ezra Cleveland OT
3rd Jalen Hurts QB
4th Leki Fotu DT
5th Joshua Kelley RB
6th Devin Duverney WR
7th Jon Runyun OG

[rikardo]

Yes really. Lamar has made big strides and fits their system, is young with NFL experience. Why would they trade Lamar to draft Lawrence? That's actually crazy.

I think you are over rating Lawrence a little.
I mean I like him but geez. Not sure he would even be the first pick from 2004 draft or over Luck.

ok

[Boltjolt]

ok

Jackson was the MVP last season. Who trades an MVP in his 2nd season for a rookie?

[gzubeck]

Im going out on limbs.

1.Jeudy-WR, Alabama
2.Hurts-QB, Oklahoma
3.Biadasz-OC, Wisconsin
4.RobinsonII-CB, Tulsa
5.Keene-TE, Virginia Tech
6.Kindley-OG, Georgia
7.Hawkins-S, California

:cartman:

Your going to take a late first round receiver at #6?!?!? I hope your joking and that telesco moves down with a trade. Even if we move down to say 14 there will be at least 2 receivers that we could pick up with first round grades. But hey, after the Mike Williams thing anything is possible. Stupid to take a receiver at #6 other than CeeDee Lamb. So I'm going out on a Lamb (Pun Intended) that if we pick at #6 that Lamb Should be the pick.

[Critty]

Your going to take a late first round receiver at #6?!?!? I hope your joking and that telesco moves down with a trade. Even if we move down to say 14 there will be at least 2 receivers that we could pick up with first round grades. But hey, after the Mike Williams thing anything is possible. Stupid to take a receiver at #6 other than CeeDee Lamb. So I'm going out on a Lamb (Pun Intended) that if we pick at #6 that Lamb Should be the pick.

I hear you. Crazy....but after Allen & Williams the WR depth chart is terrible. What is more useful in the mind of Telesco.....a WR who gets open easily or a o-lineman who block it better. A talented QB who needs to develop. Well.... If the recievers are still covered a second later with better blocking... Then QB still has to hold the ball and find an open man. If QB still learning to play at NFL level then also will hold ball longer. But the Recievers that gets open quickly allows the QB to get the ball out quicker. Less pressure on o-line and QB if you have a security blanket that gets open asap. Does TT think like that.....im going out on a limb and saying yes, yes he does. So Jeudy is in play at #6.

Its a team game.
Any upgrade should help the entire unit.
Even another WR.