Official 2019 Pre Draft Discussion

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Formula 21
    replied
    AFC SOUTH - TENNESSEE TITANS

    Every single player the Titans selected was ranked higher on the PFF draft board than where they were selected in the draft. Mississippi State defensive tackle Jeffrey Simmons was a top-10 player on our board that they got at 19. We wouldn't have batted an eye if Ole Miss wideout A.J. Brown was actually the selection for the Titans at 19 and instead they secured our number two wide receiver with the 51st overall pick. They capped it off with one of the steals of the draft, nabbing Iowa safety Amani Hooker (PFF's 44th ranked player) midway through the fourth round at 116 overall.
    Why pay for an expensive scouting staff when you can just use PFFs top 300?

    Leave a comment:


  • wu-dai clan
    replied
    He's a modern football player...

    Leave a comment:


  • beachcomber
    replied
    Originally posted by powderblueboy View Post
    tillery was #11 on the list
    Some scouts criticized Tillery's down-to-down consistency and coach-ability, but none questioned his talent.
    for myself, the above is code for iconoclast individual, someone that is his own man, and.... in some circles translates to independent thinker, or thinks independently of coaches.

    I think those guys oft turn out pretty well in the League, as long as peoples/their coaches are willing to let them be who they are.

    http://www.rotoworld.com/college-football/nfl-draft/player/38352/jerry-tillery

    Leave a comment:


  • Formula 21
    replied
    Im so glad Dexter went early. He'll be a fa after 4 years as the league goes smaller and quicker.

    Leave a comment:


  • powderblueboy
    replied
    tillery was #11 on the list

    Leave a comment:


  • beachcomber
    replied
    Originally posted by UglyTruth View Post
    Telesco has neglected the DL long enough, he needs to draft a DT tomorrow as there will be at least one quality one available where we pick.
    eye like Steve's suggestion to play Dex @the 3T if we were to draft him.... (can we then sign Shelton to play NT alongside him ?? !!)

    also like the idea of grading our scouts to see which ones have an eye for talent.... still suspect there is some AJ residue within our scouting ranks ??

    Leave a comment:


  • beachcomber
    replied
    if that's what I'm working w/my clusters look like this....

    28) AJ Brown, Risner, Nasir, McCoy, McGary
    60) Mack, Jachai, CGJ, Deionte, Cajuste

    thinkin' the Oline is the safer pick, albeit Tom is on record as needing to shore up the LB corps ??

    if it's me, am going Nasir then Cajuste....

    and rumor has it that Az is holding off on Murray (will believe if and when it comes to pass as he is too true a fit for Kingsbury's scheme), and so top five looks like.... ??

    Bosa/Az, Quinnen/SF, Oliver/NY, Murray (scuttlebutt is that Mayock & Co. is staying clear of QB round one.... don't think they should pass on Kyler tho), White/TB

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleet
    replied

    Getty Images
    RANKINGS THOR 500: NYSTROM'S BIG BOARD


    BY THOR NYSTROM
    Updated on April 24, 2019, 5:06 pm ET
    FacebookTwitterRedditEmailPrint
    Rk Name Position Ht Wt Comp SPARQ RAS
    1 Quinnen Williams DL1 6'3 303 Donald/McCoy 83.1 9.85
    2 Josh Allen EDGE1 6'5 262 Anthony Barr-plus 78 9.74
    3 Ed Oliver DL2 6'2 287 John Randle 99.5 9.87
    4 T.J. Hockenson TE1 6'5 251 Rob Gronkowski 85.4 9.21
    5 Nick Bosa EDGE2 6'4 266 Joey Bosa 74.8 9.43
    6 Andre Dillard OT1 6'5 315 Terron Armstead 96.9 9.81
    7 Jonah Williams OT2 6'4 302 Jake Matthews 17.7 5.51
    8 Devin White LB1 6'0 237 Myles Jack 93.3 9.33
    9 Dwayne Haskins QB1 6'3 231 Better Jameis 12.8 3.49
    10 Brian Burns EDGE4 6'5 249 Leonard Floyd 94.1 9.9
    11 Jerry Tillery DL3 6'4 295 DeForest Buckner 84.2 9.72
    12 Devin Bush LB2 5'11 234 Shaq Thompson 96.9 9.33
    13 Montez Sweat EDGE3 6'6 260 Danielle Hunter 97.1 9.9
    14 Greedy Williams CB1 6'2 185 Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie 68.6 8.5
    15 Hakeem Butler WR1 6'5 227 Plaxico Burress 80.7 9.48
    16 Jawaan Taylor OT3 6'5 312 Trent Williams n/a n/a
    17 Jeffery Simmons DL4 6'4 301 Ndamukong Suh n/a n/a
    18 Garrett Bradbury OC1 6'3 306 Max Unger 91.7 9.96
    19 Clelin Ferrell EDGE5 6'4 264 Derrick Morgan n/a n/a
    20 Kyler Murray QB2 5'10 207 Boom/bust Vick n/a n/a
    21 Christian Wilkins DL5 6'3 315 Kawaan Short 44.4 8.55
    22 N'Keal Harry WR2 6'2 228 Dez Bryant 75.4 8.42
    23 Cody Ford OT4 6'4 329 Brandon Brooks 35.6 6.33
    24 Byron Murphy CB2 5'11 189 Brent Grimes 46.1 6.44
    25 Noah Fant TE2 6'4 249 Jimmy Graham 98.4 9.89
    26 Chris Lindstrom OG1 6'4 308 Joel Bitonio 96.6 9.83
    27 Dexter Lawrence DL6 6'4 342 Linval Joseph n/a 9.87
    28 Julian Love CB3 5'11 195 Ronde Barber 60.8 7.06
    29 Marquise Brown WR3 5'9 166 DeSean Jackson n/a n/a
    30 A.J. Brown WR4 6'0 226 JuJu Smith-Schuster 75.8 8.6
    31 Rashan Gary EDGE6 6'4 277 Robert Nkemdiche 94.9 9.95
    32 Daniel Jones QB3 6'5 221 Ryan Tannehill 78.8 8.1
    Rk Name Position Ht Wt Comp SPARQ RAS
    33 Dalton Risner OG2 6'6 312 Cody Whitehair 42.0 7.69
    34 DreMont Jones DL7 6'3 281 Nick Fairley 20.7 6.16
    35 D.K. Metcalf WR5 6'3 228 David Boston 99.0 9.66
    36 David Long CB4 5'11 196 Duke Dawson 91.2 9.22
    37 Nasir Adderley S1 6'0 206 Jessie Bates 65.0 7.11
    38 Deandre Baker CB5 5'11 193 Tre'Davious White 9.5 4.58
    39 Jaylon Ferguson EDGE7 6'4 256 Marcus Davenport 8.9 5.46
    40 David Montgomery RB1 5'10 222 Kareem Hunt 36.4 5.24
    41 Chase Winovich EDGE8 6'3 256 Markus Golden 67.8 8.63
    42 Jace Sternberger TE3 6'4 251 Greg Olsen 22.0 5.25
    43 Erik McCoy OC2 6'4 303 Pat Elflein 62.4 8.97
    44 Blake Cashman LB3 6'1 237 Jake Ryan 90.9 9.51
    45 Justin Layne CB6 6'2 192 Eric Rowe 87.0 8.97
    46 Max Scharping OT5 6'6 327 Ricky Wagner n/a 8.83
    47 Amani Hooker S2 5'11 210 Kenny Vaccaro 84.5 9.09
    48 Kaleb McGary OT6 6'7 317 Cam Robinson 84.2 9.83
    49 Rock Ya-Sin CB7 6'0 192 Marlin Jackson 58.5 6.18
    50 Darnell Savage Jr. S3 5'11 198 Antoine Bethea 86.5 8.35
    51 Juan Thornhill S4 6'0 205 Marcus Williams 99.5 9.75
    52 Deebo Samuel WR6 5'11 214 Christian Kirk 76.3 7.92
    53 Josh Jacobs RB2 5'10 220 Off-brand Kamara 18.9 5.76
    54 Elgton Jenkins OC3 6'4 310 Billy Price 50.1 9.34
    55 Zach Allen DL8 6'4 281 Brett Keisel 54.2 5.17
    56 Taylor Rapp S5 6'0 208 Mike Brown 31.9 5.65
    57 Will Grier QB4 6'2 217 Case Keenum 57.8 7.22
    58 Mack Wilson LB4 6'1 240 C.J. Mosley 30.5 5.25
    59 Anthony Nelson EDGE9 6'7 271 Carl Nassib 78.6 9.49
    60 Andy Isabella WR7 5'9 188 Marquise Goodwin 50.6 7.03
    61 Lonnie Johnson CB8 6'2 213 Chris McCalister 92.6 9.4
    62 Tytus Howard OT7 6'5 322 Terron Armstead 28.8 6.34
    63 Dru Samia OG3 6'5 305 James Hurst 18.1 7.65
    64 Chuma Edoga OT8 6'3 308 Laremy Tunsil n/a 7.79
    Rk Name Position Ht Wt Comp SPARQ RAS
    65 Jalen Hurd WR8 6'5 226 Terrelle Pryor 75.9 8.21
    66 Miles Boykin WR9 6'4 220 Kenny Golladay 99.9 9.94
    67 Jahlani Tavai LB5 6'2 250 Vontaze Burfict 6.8 4.14
    68 Drew Lock QB5 6'4 228 Blaine Gabbert 75.6 9.36
    69 Devin Singletary RB3 5'8 203 Devonta Freeman 7.8 1.74
    70 Miles Sanders RB4 5'11 211 Cadillac Williams 72.9 9.5
    71 Jachai Polite EDGE10 6'3 258 Damontre Moore 0.9 1.77
    72 Sutton Smith LB6 6'0 233 Joe Schobert 38.7 5.6
    73 Chauncey Gardner-Johnson S6 5'11 210 Nate Allen 66.1 7.86
    74 Joejuan Williams CB9 6'4 211 Ahkello Witherspoon 68.2 8.08
    75 Deionte Thompson S7 6'1 195 Tashaun Gipson n/a n/a
    76 Parris Campbell WR10 6'0 205 Big Curtis Samuel 99.3 9.77
    77 Darrell Henderson RB5 5'8 208 Tevin Coleman 66.9 7.74
    78 Kelvin Harmon WR11 6'2 221 Laquon Treadwell 20.7 4.92
    79 Charles Omenihu DL9 6'5 280 Romeo Okwara 50.2 6.22
    80 Kahale Warring TE4 6'5 252 Dallas Goedert 79.3 9.41
    81 Greg Little OT9 6'5 310 Greg Robinsom 36.3 3.63
    82 Yodny Cajuste OT10 6'5 312 Jermon Bushrod n/a n/a
    83 Damien Harris RB6 5'10 216 Frank Gore 45.5 6.43
    84 Hjalte Froholdt OG4 6'5 306 Isaac Seumalo 44.7 9.07
    85 Johnathan Abram S8 5'11 205 Keanu Neal 36.3 7.01
    86 Drue Tranquill LB7 6'2 234 Fred Warner 88.8 9.87
    87 Sean Bunting CB10 6'0 195 Eli Apple 94.7 9.65
    88 Jamel Dean CB11 6'1 206 Kevin King 97.6 9.93
    89 J.J. Arcega-Whiteside WR12 6'2 225 Eric Decker 33.7 6.17
    90 Bobby Evans OT11 6'4 312 Daryl Williams 45.2 7.36
    91 Maxx Crosby EDGE11 6'5 255 Jeremiah Attaochu 88.7 9.64
    92 Trysten Hill DL10 6'3 308 Brandon Dunn 81.7 8.99
    93 D'Andre Walker EDGE12 6'2 251 Dee Ford n/a n/a
    94 Terry McLaurin WR13 6'0 208 Nate Burleson 87.8 9.58
    95 Stanley Morgan Jr. WR14 6'0 202 Marqise Lee 81.5 8.62
    96 Nate Davis OG5 6'3 316 Ben Grubbs 23.8 6.17
    97 Michael Deiter OG6 6'5 309 Forrest Lamp 26.8 5.68
    98 Irv Smith Jr. TE5 6'2 242 Trey Burton 21.7 4.82
    99 Sione Takitaki LB8 6'1 238 Todd Davis 73.4 9.08
    100 Ben Burr-Kirven LB9 6'0 230 Ben Heeney 84.6 8.95
    101 L.J. Collier EDGE13 6'2 283 Robert Geathers 9.3 3.25
    102 Trayvon Mullen CB12 6'1 199 Kevin Johnson 48.3 7.48

    Leave a comment:


  • Lone Bolt
    replied
    Originally posted by Xenos View Post
    Thanks! Good stuff. Not a popular opinion, but would love it if we found a way to use him here...but our staff would have to believe that in addition to his quickness, and overall football abilities, which are top notch, that he actually was faster than his 40 time, and had enough range to man that single high...but I'm a Rapp homer, so maybe I'm dreaming here.
    Good news though if we do like him...he might make it to #60.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenos
    replied
    For the Taylor Rapp supporters:
    https://theathletic.com/940089/2019/...sus-big-board/

    Data and​ technology are rapidly making their mark​ on the football​ evaluation industry. The application​ of​ these​ numbers​ into​ scouting,​ usually​ called analytics,​​ is itself fairly polarizing. But the NFL is broadly adopting many of these concepts into the scouting process.

    The Vikings are adopting heuristics to improve traditional scouting by figuring out which of their scouts are the best at evaluating particular positions while the Patriots are somewhat famous for using data to improve their methods. We've been doing some data analysis of our own, releasing a big board of the top 300 players in the draft as determined by a consensus of over 40 draft analysts, which you can check out here.

    How players perform on the field and in the workouts at their pro days gives us a lot of information to work with, so long as the data is treated carefully and within context. Primarily, traditional scouting provides the framework for evaluation, with data applied afterward to tweak conclusions.

    Not only that, it's important to understand that the data doesn't tell us definitively which players are going to be good, only which players have better odds than their similarly-graded peers to break out and have an impact.

    For example, the fact that TCU edge rusher Ben Banogu has a better analytical profile than Ohio State product Nick Bosa doesn't mean that Banogu is a better player than Bosa -- in all likelihood, Bosa will be a better player. Instead, it means that Banogu has better odds than other edge rushers that might be picked in the same area as he will be to perform at a high level.

    This approach has helped teams identify gems outside of the first round: the Vikings used a combination of workout data and traditional scouting to identify Danielle Hunter, while the Falcons did the same to grab linebacker Foyesade Oluokun.

    Below, we'll look at the biggest risers and fallers based on the best available data and isolate a new, analytics-driven top 100. When we update the consensus big board before the draft to include new boards and information, we'll also have a ranking for those players in the "analytics" big board.

    All the players listed below will have production, age and athleticism scores listed with them, with those scores meant to be read like an IQ score, or OPS+ in baseball -- where 100 is average, and every 15 points represents one standard deviation (if you're unfamiliar with standard deviation, think of it each standard deviation as one tier).

    The final score is not an average of the other three scores because those scores have a relationship with each other (productive players tend to be athletic), a final modifier was used to even out those relationships.

    Risers

    Taylor Rapp, S Washington

    Overall Score Productivity Athleticism Age
    132.3 120.8 123.4 128.1

    Safeties don't respond to data analysis as well as other positions, likely because they don't impact plays in ways that are statistically easy to measure. Earl Thomas forces quarterbacks to throw short and to the sidelines because of his range, but it doesn't always show up in his coverage statistics. Production is a good indicator of future success, it just isn't a great one.

    The determinants of success at safety are very similar to linebacker and cornerback, which makes sense considering their job is a combination of those two roles. Good safeties tended to have a higher market share of solo tackles in college and higher ball hawk rates than similarly drafted counterparts.

    Rapp stands out in this type of analysis. In coverage, he only allowed 0.13 yards per snap, the best of any safety in the top 300 of the consensus board. When accounting for the added value of denying touchdowns and forcing interceptions, he doesn't quite meet the adjusted yards value of Nasir Adderley or Jaquan Johnson, but he comes fairly close -- not having allowed a touchdown and generating two picks.

    He also ranks in the top 70 percent in tackle production and the top 95 percent in avoiding missed tackles. His statistics show he's an elite coverage defender and a strong run defender.

    Many came away from his pro day showing, where he ran a 4.78 40-yard dash, arguing that he's actually much more of a box safety than a free safety, despite a PFF coverage grade that led the PAC-12 and was one of the best in the FBS.

    But that 40-yard dash time, while not insignificant, isn't as important, historically, as agility scores and explosion scores, not to mention overall size. Heavier safeties and agile safeties matter much more than faster safeties.

    The fact that he ran a 3.99-second short shuttle, which ranks in the 98th percentile among safeties, helps bolster his score a lot more than the 40-yard dash hurts it. Beyond his agility times are his adequate explosion scores. He just clears the filters for broad jump, and my research shows that beyond 9'2" -- a fairly low threshold -- additional performance in the broad jump doesn't correlate to any more success.

    Leave a comment:


  • Panamamike
    replied
    Originally posted by Boltjolt View Post

    I think the key word needs to be switched from "Developes" to Recruits. So no, those teams shouldnt b on there. They havent been that good the last ten years. At least not like the teams on that list.

    Stanford was just better than par for the course when they had a better recruiting lately. UCLA hasnt been a big threat in years. Oregon back to average after Chip left and his recruits were gone a few years later.
    Oregon got a great recruiter as their new HC. Fantastic class this year and should build a really strong future there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boltjolt
    replied
    Originally posted by Topcat View Post

    No USC, no UCLA, no Stanford, Washington, Oregon...interesting...
    I think the key word needs to be switched from "Developes" to Recruits. So no, those teams shouldnt b on there. They havent been that good the last ten years. At least not like the teams on that list.

    Stanford was just better than par for the course when they had a better recruiting lately. UCLA hasnt been a big threat in years. Oregon back to average after Chip left and his recruits were gone a few years later.
    Last edited by Boltjolt; 04-24-2019, 01:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X