Most Disappointing Defensive Player

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • Formula 21
    The Future is Now
    • Jun 2013
    • 16281
    • Republic of San Diego
    • Send PM
    #25
    Why are we investing most of our top picks on D players, and then playing a D meant for average players? This D is SOFT, it's meant for players who can't compete one on one.
    Now, if you excuse me, I have some Charger memories to suppress.
    The Wasted Decade is done.
    Build Back Better.
    • 👍 1
    • Top
    • Bottom

    Comment

    • 21&500
      Bolt Spit-Baller
      • Sep 2018
      • 10555
      • A Whale's Vajayjay
      • CMB refugee
      • Send PM
      #26
      Originally posted by Formula 21 View Post
      Why are we investing most of our top picks on D players, and then playing a D meant for average players? This D is SOFT, it's meant for players who can't compete one on one.
      I expect that to change very soon.
      G-Ro knows.
      • 👍 1
      • Top
      • Bottom

      Comment

      • powderblueboy
        Registered Charger Fan
        • Jul 2017
        • 9065
        • Send PM
        #27
        Originally posted by Formula 21 View Post
        Why are we investing most of our top picks on D players, and then playing a D meant for average players? This D is SOFT, it's meant for players who can't compete one on one.
        On defense, they've invested a lot of draft capital in the safety & linebacker positions: loads of first ,2nd, & 4rth round picks.

        Has that been wise?
        • 👍 2
        • Top
        • Bottom

        Comment

        Previous 1 2 3 template Next
        Working...
        X