Tweet
I think the fans deserve to know now before the season who they are paying to see. I think a unified voice stating no confidence in the Chargers loyalty is in order. If they want to stonewall San Diego's effort, let them have a lame duck year. #thenowherechargers make it happen.
-
Go Rivers! -
I agree -
Don't let them play at QualcommComment
-
And somehow season ticket sales are way up. Go figure.Originally posted by Stinky Wizzleteats+ View PostComment
-
Says who, the Chargers? So many season seats are owned by brokers it doesn't really matter.Originally posted by richpjr View PostComment
-
I wonder when the class action suit will hit the court? I also wonder how many of those sales will end up re-sales to out of town fans or no shows...Go Rivers!Comment
-
-
Comment
-
The Name of the team. Keep it here. They can be the LA Weasels!Originally posted by richpjr View Post
Even if we keep the name, I still say when we get an expansion team we call them the flugelhorns!Comment
-
"When NFL players were locked out a few years ago, they won an anti-trust lawsuit against the league for depriving them of the ability to market their services citing the monopoly power of the NFL.
Chargers fans could do the same by defending their right to keep the team in San Diego.
"A monopoly, or cartel, controls the supply and demand for its products.
In the NFL, that includes the number of players, teams and stadium venues.
"When the NFL says well, we're going to artificially control the number of teams, and then play one city off against the other that's a monopoly, engaging in monopoly conduct:which is clearly illegal as the courts have so said," said Attorney Mike Aguirre."
I know it's Aguirre, but he has a point.Comment
-
Even if San Diego would never get another NFL team again, I'm all for suing Spanos for the name just out of spite.
That might be actually doing him a favor though since no one in LA cares about the "Chargers".Comment
-
Go Rivers!Comment
Comment