Originally posted by Heatmiser
View Post
The Trey Pipkins thread…
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Heatmiser View PostCrosby really is a phenomenal player. Even though he didn’t get a sack or many pressures, he was still extremely disruptive in the run game. Chandler Jones played like I though he would. Invisible. Oh, he will have a game in which he piles up 4 sacks when it doesn’t matter but he will be largely invisible the majority of games. I almost forgot he played for the Raiders. So they jettisoned a younger, better edge player for an older more expensive less effective one.
TG"The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wu-dai clan View Posthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1-2F...w?usp=drivesdk
I now have two (2) of these magical shirts. Chargers have bookend Duke Disciple offensive tackles. Watch the magic unfold.
#trenchers4life
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Crosby got a 92.9 from PFF while Pipkins got a got a 53. With those grades you'd have thought Crosby put a game like Mack had. I still haven't had a chance to watch most of the game (and won't until I get back to the states), but I don't get what goes into their grading system.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Parcells View PostCrosby got a 92.9 from PFF while Pipkins got a got a 53. With those grades you'd have thought Crosby put a game like Mack had. I still haven't had a chance to watch most of the game (and won't until I get back to the states), but I don't get what goes into their grading system.
83 crosby 67 pipkins would make more sense to me"The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fouts2herbert View Post
He is, he reminds a little bit of jared allen in his unrelenting hustle, but that’s not to imply that he’s a try hard, he’s very physically talented, strength, quickness, burst, hand are strong, speed, and his spin move is stupid fast it’s ridiculous, he might be even quicker than allen, even when our tackles throw his ass on the ground he pops up in a nano second and lunges to make plays and those fucking arms are ridiculous, they definitely help him cause all sorts of havoc, he’s a special player, his motor runs on high octane fuel…
We'll see how that goes.We play modern Harball.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Parcells View PostFor reference, Khalil Mack was only an 87."The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Parcells View PostCrosby got a 92.9 from PFF while Pipkins got a got a 53. With those grades you'd have thought Crosby put a game like Mack had. I still haven't had a chance to watch most of the game (and won't until I get back to the states), but I don't get what goes into their grading system.Now, if you excuse me, I have some Charger memories to suppress.
Let’s win one for Mack.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fouts2herbert View Post
Okay that makes no fuckin sense crosby 92.9 and mack 87? PFF is smoking the the good stuff…
E.g. Zion had 67 total snaps (35 pass, 32 run). His pass block grade was 68.8, while his run block grade was 50.0. His combined grade was 54.8
Yeah, sure that makes sense :smoking:
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment