Originally posted by Heatmiser
View Post
Ot: praying for peace
Collapse
X
-
Just curious if the 52% is reflective of being pulled over and scrutinized more often? If say (and I'm making these numbers up as an example) 50% of stops were black people, 50% white, but only 5% of the white stops ended up in searches, while 30% of black stops ended up in searches, then it's highly likely the added scrutiny is inflating the crime statistics for the black drivers.
- Top
- Bottom
-
My understanding was that the UCR was insufficient for these kinds of cases. They supposedly were not collecting the necessary data points to understand who is killing whom and in what circumstances.Originally posted by SDfan View PostThe FBI publishes their UCR, Unified Crime Report which details everything about crimes in America including breakdowns of what groups committed the most crimes, which races commit the most crimes on their own and other races, the numbers of homicides by groups (including cops) and a lot more for anyone that cares to dig beyond sensational stories the media feeds us to form impressions and opinions to support agendas.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Not to get *******al, but here's why the disparity.Originally posted by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR View PostJust interesting results. Can't speak to the study's methodology and am troubled by trends shown in non-lethal cases. I have no particular slant on this issue, just a lot of sadness. But data is sorely lacking on this issue so any is worth considering.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/12....google.com%2F
Cops patrol high crime areas more often, so it's only logical that the stats will skew to whatever area happens to be the high crime area. If high crime areas are predominately African Americans, the results will skew to that.
The answer is simple: If you don't like cops in your area, work with them to make crime vanish....once the crime rate goes down, the cops will relocate to the new high crime area, and everyone wins.sigpic
👍 1- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I don't know the answer, but I know the answer is not simple.Originally posted by floydefisher View PostNot to get *******al, but here's why the disparity.
Cops patrol high crime areas more often, so it's only logical that the stats will skew to whatever area happens to be the high crime area. If high crime areas are predominately African Americans, the results will skew to that.
The answer is simple: If you don't like cops in your area, work with them to make crime vanish....once the crime rate goes down, the cops will relocate to the new high crime area, and everyone wins.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Yeah, that seems like a really weird strategy to me as well.Originally posted by TTK View PostSniping and ambushing innocent cops certainly isn't going to make them less trigger-happy. It's going to have the opposite effect.
Wanting police to stop shooting you, so you shoot them? Umm, that's most definitely NOT going to work.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
-
Considering that nobody has solved poverty and crime in any city anywhere ever, I'm thinking the answer isn't simple.Originally posted by floydefisher View PostOnce you strip away all the bs and ********, you would be surprised how simple things become.
Cops are in my complex quite a bit. I don't think I'm going to change that.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
Comment