Charger Roster cuts...

[thelightningwill]

We need at least 6 WR, it's a very tiring position.

I'd trade 6 wide receivers for one left tackle.

[thelightningwill]

I wasn't trying to insinuate they only go with 4 WR's. I was saying there is already quality depth at the receiver position and they need to focus on other positions that have much less depth.

Think of it this way........what would be more damaging to the team, Floyd or Cox going on IR? Or Cam Thomas or FLoyd going on IR? The answer is never Floyd.

Let's keep our Cox off I.R. Wives need to be kept happy or football season will be difficult to watch.

[SFW]

Let's keep our Cox off I.R. Wives need to be kept happy or football season will be difficult to watch.

Its even harder to keep the wife happy and watch football at the same time.

[thelightningwill]

Its even harder to keep our wife happy and watch football at the same time.

Sounds like we have the same wife.

[Antonio's Gates]

teams dont cut servicable offensive linemen, thats why i havent included that as a position we need to look at.

[Boltjolt]

this. we need to focus on DL depth. maybe another WR

I think the DL depth is still better than the OL depth.

[thelightningwill]

I think the DL depth is still better than the OL depth.

OL depth? How about OL starters?

[Stinky Wizzleteats+]

We have five technicaly, but...

[Den60]

but if they DIDN'T sign a vet OT (Starks, Mckinney) and put all their faith in uproven King Dunlop and he got hurt or really sucked- we'd be back to starting Harris at LT and some people here would be in Den's camp wanting TT fired and going all negative for not having a backup plan there.

When did I ever say we needed Starks? Hell, I was the first one who pointed out how terrible he and his teammates protected Ben. In the first PS games I said he had to get a helluva lot better in order to make this team. He only got worse. He rewrote the book on terrible last Thursday. I wasn't a fan of McKinney either. Dunlop was a "meh" for me who now happens to be are starter. I think our o-line will still be one of the worst in the league this year even without an injury to a starter.

Where I chastise TT (in terms of the o-line) is the fact that all he has done long term for the line is replace Vasquez with Fluker. Next year we are going to need a bunch of new guys on the line.

[Den60]

Yea it's a show me signing. The 160k got him to SD. Ok so we now definitely have enough for whatever signing bonus needed for Butler's extension.

That depends on whom we sign this week. We are $4.96M under the cap right now. If we bring in a lot of vet players that will shrink. We also don't know how much has to be budgeted for Freeney's performance bonus.

[Den60]

I think the DL depth is still better than the OL depth.

And I think dying by drowning is better than dying by burning...

[Boltjolt]

When did I ever say we needed Starks? Hell, I was the first one who pointed out how terrible he and his teammates protected Ben. In the first PS games I said he had to get a helluva lot better in order to make this team. He only got worse. He rewrote the book on terrible last Thursday. I wasn't a fan of McKinney either. Dunlop was a "meh" for me who now happens to be are starter. I think our o-line will still be one of the worst in the league this year even without an injury to a starter.

Where I chastise TT (in terms of the o-line) is the fact that all he has done long term for the line is replace Vasquez with Fluker. Next year we are going to need a bunch of new guys on the line.

Not really true but whatever. I agree they still need many OL upgrades but Fluker replaces Clary who isnt a RT and a better OG. Vasquez wasnt that great as a OG and im glad we didnt pay him the 24 mil he got from Denver. If you ask me, he is a downgrade for them and he is dinged up already. Rinehart though on a one year deal is better than Greene was who didnt make a roster this year.
The OL depth is crap so i expect a add on or two through cuts and draft picks next year and or FA'cy.