OT: Redsigned Logos for Every Team

[Jaywa]

Browns: Far superior to their now current shit-stain brown canvas logo
Bengals: A tiger prawn?
Titans: Bad-ass
Buffalo: Old school looking, nice
Raiders: Laughable, like their whole organization
Bolts: Lame
KC: Boring
Tampa: Perhaps best of the bunch, up there with the Titans
Niners: Solid
'Hawks: Took me 20 seconds to understand that it was attempting to depict a seahawk

[Screeme]

I'm kind of neutral towards most of them, since they're mostly sleeker versions of what is there.

The one that stands out to me the most as the best is the Buc's. TB needs to pay the man and switch to that logo today. It's really good.

I also like the Redskins logo.

I'm not sure why the Browns get a bulldog, but, whatever. Anything is better than what they have now.

Oaklands is pretty ridiculous.

I think the Jets looks like Jels.

Anybody else think the Cowboy looks like Jon Voight?

I don't hate ours, but I don't love it either. I wish the neck didn't arch so much at the bottom, but I look the working of the bolt and color scheme into the mane. If he reworked it so it looked more horselike, like the Bronco's logo.. I'd like it a lot more.

[captaind]

No comments on the constipated Cardinal?

I was trying to think of who the Cowboy reminded me of. Screeme just nailed it.

[6025]

So the Cowboys redesigned logo is of the Midnight Cowboy, i.e., a male prostitute. Great.

[Lightnin']

...I do not like the Chargers equine/crescent-lightning bolt that comes off as a two-tones of blue & yellow copy of the Bengals Tiger in orange/black.
Throw in a subtle "C" reference; Cincinnati and/or Chargers and we're all relieved the individual teams, not a Central Design Authority actually designs
the unis & logos.

Improvements-Yes.

Cleveland, Buffalo, Tennessee, Chicago and Tampa look better to me than their current logos.

The standard for a badass redbird still remains with the University of Louisville, not in Arizona or St. Louis (MLB).

The similarity between the interlocking typography of the Giants, Green Bay, and Kansas City is glaring.

Dallas, Pittsburgh, and San Francisco are just plain goofy.

I certainly appreciate and admire Mr. O'Brien's passion and obvious talent. But, as I said before-there's a good reason
the individual franchises design and tweak their respective logos...

[Maverick]

those are REALLY bad.....

[Bolt-O]

Those logos look more like the designs of a new school tattoo artist, vs. a corporate logo designer. Some of the current logos need change, like the Jaguars, Browns (who really have none), Titans, Bengals, and a few others, but many are too classic to change. I prefer simple, but that's me.

[Beerman]

Was it bad that it took me like 30 seconds to find our logo? Not used to seeing that ugly ass horse. Really hate that we look like the donkeys. I wasn't born when they used that logo so I don't feel bad for not recognizing it.

[6025]

Was it bad that it took me like 30 seconds to find our logo? Not used to seeing that ugly ass horse. Really hate that we look like the donkeys. I wasn't born when they used that logo so I don't feel bad for not recognizing it.

You shouldn't feel bad regardless, that logo is a piece of shit, like all of them.

[Vermstyr]

The only ones that improve on the current logo are the Jaguars, Patriots, and Redskins.

The current Jaguars logo is so tame looking that is bothers me; I wish this was the actual logo.

[Highboltage]

The Cowboy's one looks more like the witch from Wicked.

[Mister Hoarse]

These pretty much suck across the board. Have every team return to their 1969 uniforms and call it a day.

Absofuckinglutely!