Neither Dansby or Spikes is as good an option. A lot of things go into being the best option. Dansby is the better player, but being on the wrong side of 30 and a lot more wear and tear doesn't make you a better FA prospect.
Spikes is a much better run stuffer, but the guy is lost in pass coverage. He is stiff, not fast, lacks lateral quickness and just cannot run well. He is a much better run down guy, and he could be one of those guys who might dominate in the run game, but he won't even be on the field on passing downs, so he will never put up the stats.
Again, how good a signing will depend on how much and how good productive he is next season. But every down LB are rare.
Spikes is a much better run stuffer, but the guy is lost in pass coverage. He is stiff, not fast, lacks lateral quickness and just cannot run well. He is a much better run down guy, and he could be one of those guys who might dominate in the run game, but he won't even be on the field on passing downs, so he will never put up the stats.
Again, how good a signing will depend on how much and how good productive he is next season. But every down LB are rare.
Comment