I invite anyone here to go visit (an unedited) dialog where Clarlie Kirk dialoged with others.
Many of his dialogs were held at the most prestigious universities of the world, while Charlie held no college credentials himself. He faced them all...a minority against the mob...and did so impromptu, while his opposers had well-crafted darts, deliberated for weeks.
I ask you to consider: Who held the more intellectually sound argument? Who expressed the superior moral compass? Who was most compassionate to his opponents?
I can only credit a source of truth larger than Charlie for his repeated success...as he would himself. His opponents ultimately decided the only way to win was to silence, slander, censor or shoot a bullet in his throat.
Many of his dialogs were held at the most prestigious universities of the world, while Charlie held no college credentials himself. He faced them all...a minority against the mob...and did so impromptu, while his opposers had well-crafted darts, deliberated for weeks.
I ask you to consider: Who held the more intellectually sound argument? Who expressed the superior moral compass? Who was most compassionate to his opponents?
I can only credit a source of truth larger than Charlie for his repeated success...as he would himself. His opponents ultimately decided the only way to win was to silence, slander, censor or shoot a bullet in his throat.
Comment