Chargers 3/4 is not a 3/4, OK...

[KNSD]

I used to think the number-one thing a D needed was a great line. However, I've come around to your way of thinking. Hard to argue with evidence. When Ingram is healthy, we win. When he isn't healthy, we lose.

You can say that about any almost impact player - regardless of position. In other words, I think it's an Ingram thing, not an OLB thing.

[MakoShark]

LMAO @ Stinky

#whatthreadisthis

[KNSD]

edit: wrong thread.

[Stinky Wizzleteats+]

Sorry...

[Mister Hoarse]

He probably posted it in all of the threads.

[MakoShark]

Gotta love 'em. The Powder Blues without Stinky would be like peas without carrots.

[Mister Hoarse]

Gotta love 'em. The Powder Blues without Stinky would be like peas without carrots.

And his posts are like a box of chocolates.

If the chocolates had a few washers, cotter pins, aspirin, viagra, raisins, rabbit poops, a cufflink, some shag carpeting fiber, a car key, part of a kid's toy, and maybe some scrabble letters almost forming a word...

I kid. Ah loves you Stinky.

[Stinky Wizzleteats+]

Stinky is as Stinky does...

[Wheels]

Gotta love 'em. The Powder Blues without Stinky would be like peas without carrots.

This place would

[advertisement]

suck without stinky.

[Stinky Wizzleteats+]

Feeling the love logo :

[Mister Hoarse]

Time to feel this love logo:

[Steve]

I used to think the number-one thing a D needed was a great line. However, I've come around to your way of thinking. Hard to argue with evidence. When Ingram is healthy, we win. When he isn't healthy, we lose.

We may be thinking the same. The issue is that you think of OLB in our system as being true LB. They are DL. There is hardly any difference between our OLB and a 43 DE. So, why is drafting a DE and DL for a 43 D and for a 34 D not helping our DL up front? It is the same position, it is about establishing a new line, penetrating and making plays behind the line. WHy is that any different because we call them OLB instead of calling them DE?