Chargers @ Chiefs Wk3 Game Day Thread / Post Game Discussion

[Bolt-O]

According to Bosa James dislocated his shoulder yesterday "but just popped it back in"

That's going to be a chronic problem, unfortunately.

[La Costa Boy]

So at NFL.com the Next Gen Stats Decision Guide (whatever TF that is) says that Staley's decisions late in the game (they mention the tying figgie and then the TD pass to MW for the win) as "SUBOPTIMAL DECISIONS FOR THE WIN" Dear NFL, please tell AWS to stick it where the sun don't shine. We have a coach with brains, balls and the team responds to that. Armchair Wankers Suck must be their company name.

[Ghost of Quacksaw]

Was Josh Palmer inactive for the game? I don't remember seeing him out there, and I know he didn't have any catches.

[Ghost of Quacksaw]

That's going to be a chronic problem, unfortunately.

He'll be able to play with it, thanks to pharmaceuticals, as long as it doesn't get hurt worse.

[equivocation]

Was Josh Palmer inactive for the game? I don't remember seeing him out there, and I know he didn't have any catches.

Active, no targets. 10 snaps.

Targets hard to come by right now.

[gzubeck]

So at NFL.com the Next Gen Stats Decision Guide (whatever TF that is) says that Staley's decisions late in the game (they mention the tying figgie and then the TD pass to MW for the win) as "SUBOPTIMAL DECISIONS FOR THE WIN" Dear NFL, please tell AWS to stick it where the sun don't shine. We have a coach with brains, balls and the team responds to that. Armchair Wankers Suck must be their company name.

I wonder if they included the data for sub-optimal kicker with high winds into that equation?

:whistlin:

[equivocation]

27/35 targets went to Allen, Williams, Ekeler.

[La Costa Boy]

I wonder if they included the data for sub-optimal kicker with high winds into that equation?

:whistlin:

AWS is probably owned by dickhead Romo............

[attila]

I wonder if they included the data for sub-optimal kicker with high winds into that equation?

:whistlin:

Even in windy conditions with a crappy kicker, two kneels and a 20 yd FG are successful 90% + of the time. If you miss, you play OT and you still have a 50% chance of winning. Running plays there definitely decreased their chances of winning (turnover, penalty, or missed XP even if you are successful) as they brought the possibility of losing in regulation into play.

[Heatmiser]

"Staff" doesn't actively moderate GDTs, unless if a personal insult is involved, or the flow of thread is hijacked. Its not good form to quote outside of game time too.

Hey! We pay your salary! ….Oh you do this for free? Because you are a good guy? Who loves our team as much as we do?

Thanks Bolt-O, Fleet, and all our other mods. Cheers to you.

TG

[powderblueboy]

Even in windy conditions with a crappy kicker, two kneels and a 20 yd FG are successful 90% + of the time. If you miss, you play OT and you still have a 50% chance of winning. Running plays there definitely decreased their chances of winning (turnover, penalty, or missed XP even if you are successful) as they brought the possibility of losing in regulation into play.

If they went that route, I wouldn't have had feeling that the upcoming field goal was a 90% proposition; nor that if the field goal failed, the Chargers still had a 50% chance of winning.

[21&500]

OMG I'm in football heaven this week

The only thing more enjoyable than reading TPB today is reading Chiefs Planet.

Hahaha

Loving life right now inspite of my van's transmission breaking down