Originally posted by Boltnut
View Post
2023 Official Roster Build Thread - The Initial 53 / Practice Squad
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by wu-dai clan View PostEvery year fans around here are way off on projections.
TT and Ed McGuire will implement a plan to all of ours surprise.
One reason why i stopped doing it as much. But i do when im not working as much. Need to stop this working thing, it gets in the way of things i like lol.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt4Knob View Post
The cap is basically zero for 2024 today if you include two draft classes and signing anybody of note this offseason and having a 53 player roster. So if you push too much money this season onto 2024 and beyond - it hurts the cap.
I don't think team should be looking at 2023 as the all in year. I think they should be looking at 2023 - 2026 as a window to win with players like Herbert, Slater, Salyer, Zion (meaning the QB and core of the OLine)
But you keep saying that if you push money on Allen or Mack their cap hits will still be modest. That is incorrect - their dead cap hits increase.
If they're not "All-in" for 2023... then I don't understand their FA signs (and contract structures) at all.
Edit: And again, you can cut KA after 2023 and save yourself $23 million on the 2024 cap. I love KA (and would absolutely keep him for 2023). But 2024 becomes very do-able if you cut him after 2023.
Last edited by Boltnut; 02-04-2023, 11:37 AM.
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltjolt View Post
Well, we'll see but i dont think CB is going to be high on the draft list but if that player is BPA, so be it. Thats where im at....BPA asside fom QB.
JCJ had a catastrophic injury (patellar rupture) for any player at any position. At his position... it's a real concern. I wouldn't rely on him next year at all.
Ja'Sir Taylor got abused at the slot position when he subbed for Callahan vs. the Broncos. He's developing depth... definitely not starter in Staley's demanding scheme.
One of the biggest reasons I look at CB with the #21 pick... because I believe it will be BPA. That could change if an OT slips. I'm not one of the guys looking at RB or TE @#21. The R.O.I. @1st round RB and/or 1st round TE is not promising...
Some are looking @WR with the #21 pick. But again, historically the WR picks @#21 and beyond aren't promising. Look at the last 2 years of the draft. You're not getting immediate impact picks after the #21. Some are looking @Edge with the #21. But when you compare those players to the probable CB's @#21... IMO, the CB is the better player.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltnut View Post
Yes, I believe Duncan could be added to my OT cluster (1st-2nd round). Duke could probably clean up some of those inconsistencies I keep seeing. Jaelyn has had a nice Senior Bowl. I'll wath him during the game.
I absolutely love CB Clark Phillips in the 1st round. I like a number of CB's in the 2nd round. Give me specific CB's you like in rounds 3-5... I'll start rolling tape on them. My initial viewings tell me that last year's round 3-5 CB prospects were better than this year's...
With the improved play of Gilman... and hopes for JT Woods... I've backed away from my wish for another safety.
My PON list: CB, OT, LB, IOL, IDL, WR depth, RB depth, TE depth... man, hardly any room for safety depth... although I wouldn't complain. Does your pastey-legged safety happen to return punts...? You're eye is keen, my man...
I agree on LB. Tired of betting on K9, Tranq is pretty good but not great and he’s a FA.“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post
That non-skill focus will give us the same non-dynamic always-pressed offense we had in 2022 unless Moore is a complete magician. Able to beat bad teams, won’t compete with the elites. my strategy is the anti-nut draft. Sign Pipkins to solidify our OL and thats 3 starting caliber OTs - no team has 4 I know of. Go elite skill in 1 and 2 - Speed/slot WR, Power RB, and/or TE. Add depth at IDL, we already have starters we’re not going to cut. We also already have CBs on the roster, pending JCJ prognosis of course. We could use Edge, not on your list.
I agree on LB. Tired of betting on K9, Tranq is pretty good but not great and he’s a FA.
You may not recognize OT and CB as skilled-focus. But they make all of the players around them better.
Improve your run game... protect your QB better... balance your offense... and you'll see your skilled players (already on the roster) improve.
Mike Williams led the league in 40+ receptions in 2021... and that was with an inferior OL. Every part of the OL is ready to go (Salyer replaces Feiler). Improve your RT position with an OT (1st/2nd round)... and your whole offense will benefit. Pipkins was average (59.2 PFF) wasn't even as good at OT as Salyer (69.2 PFF). Paying him a 2nd contract makes no sense.
I expect scathing critiques of PFF to follow. But I watched both players rather closely this year. And while I might differ on specific numbers... my eyes tell me that Salyer is better. And you don't have to believe me or PFF. But the team seems to agree, also. The last few games of the season, they rolled extra protection toward Pipkins than they did Salyer...
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltnut View Post
For sure!
OT in the 1st/2nd... and an IOL in the 4th/5th would be a strategy I could get behind.
i actually don’t care what rounds they get the necessary guys in. We all know what we need. RB, WR, LB, Etc. depth at OL and DL maybe edge IDK. Probably doesn’t matter
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltnut View Post
I'd like to see your "elite skill" list of RB's, WR's, and TE's (post-21st pick) from the last 2-3 years of the draft. The post-21st picks @OT and CB are lengthy. I stand ready for the challenge, should you accept.
You may not recognize OT and CB as skilled-focus. But they make all of the players around them better.
Improve your run game... protect your QB better... balance your offense... and you'll see your skilled players (already on the roster) improve.
Mike Williams led the league in 40+ receptions in 2021... and that was with an inferior OL. Every part of the OL is ready to go (Salyer replaces Feiler). Improve your RT position with an OT (1st/2nd round)... and your whole offense will benefit. Pipkins was average (59.2 PFF) wasn't even as good at OT as Salyer (69.2 PFF). Paying him a 2nd contract makes no sense.
I expect scathing critiques of PFF to follow. But I watched both players rather closely this year. And while I might differ on specific numbers... my eyes tell me that Salyer is better. And you don't have to believe me or PFF. But the team seems to agree, also. The last few games of the season, they rolled extra protection toward Pipkins than they did Salyer...
Astounding how some don't consider he and Herberts injury when saying they weren't as good.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post
That non-skill focus will give us the same non-dynamic always-pressed offense we had in 2022 unless Moore is a complete magician. Able to beat bad teams, won’t compete with the elites. my strategy is the anti-nut draft. Sign Pipkins to solidify our OL and thats 3 starting caliber OTs - no team has 4 I know of. Go elite skill in 1 and 2 - Speed/slot WR, Power RB, and/or TE. Add depth at IDL, we already have starters we’re not going to cut. We also already have CBs on the roster, pending JCJ prognosis of course. We could use Edge, not on your list.
I agree on LB. Tired of betting on K9, Tranq is pretty good but not great and he’s a FA.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment