At the start of OTA's, it is tough for rookies to win a starting job. They don't know the system and have never played vs NFL caliber guys. And like I said above, OTA's aren't typically competition. It's about teaching everyone the scheme.
At this point, I don't think it means anything. We teach them to O and have the vets holding onto the jobs going into TC. Then the rookies get a chance to win a starting job in TC, which is what TC is for.
Even if they don't win the starting job the first week, there is no reason that they can't take over once the season starts.
The only thing that looks odd right now is that the two obvious spots for Lamp and Feeney to fill in would be RG and RT, which would put both on the same side. Given that Burwell as played some LT for us, I am a little suprised they don't put Slausson at RG, Burwell at LG, and then let Feeny compete with Burwell (which I can't imagine being a day 1 starter) and Lamp vs Barksdale (which is think is a switch a couple weeks in with Lamp winning the job).
At this point, I don't think it means anything. We teach them to O and have the vets holding onto the jobs going into TC. Then the rookies get a chance to win a starting job in TC, which is what TC is for.
Even if they don't win the starting job the first week, there is no reason that they can't take over once the season starts.
The only thing that looks odd right now is that the two obvious spots for Lamp and Feeney to fill in would be RG and RT, which would put both on the same side. Given that Burwell as played some LT for us, I am a little suprised they don't put Slausson at RG, Burwell at LG, and then let Feeny compete with Burwell (which I can't imagine being a day 1 starter) and Lamp vs Barksdale (which is think is a switch a couple weeks in with Lamp winning the job).
Comment