Originally posted by Heatmiser
View Post
Welcome back Marshall
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by thelightningwill View PostHow does a QB develop while sitting on the bench?
And, if that's possible, why waste a roster spot for a year just so we can replace our backup QB next season?
Sorensen is a decent prospect, so he would be unlikely to last on our practice squad. But is it really a waste of a roster spot? Do you feel that the roster spot is better spend on a backup OL, LB, TE, or S who will be deactivated on game day? I'd rather use that spot to develop a promising youngster into a solid backup.Adipose
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Panama View PostI've always felt the way to develop a young player is to let him sit a year or two and learn from the vet starter. But we're not trying to develop a starter, so that's moot. Sorensen will get plenty of snaps in camps and preseason, and he might get a chance to lead the scout team during the week. Sure, that's not as good as playing, but we're not a farm team fo
r the rest of the league.
Sorensen is a decent prospect, so he would be unlikely to last on our practice squad. But is it really a waste of a roster spot? Do you feel that the roster spot is better spend on a backup OL, LB, TE, or S who will be deactivated on game day? I'd rather use that spot to develop a promising youngster into a solid backup.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heatmiser View PostMarshall was the 2nd best CB on this team last year. Them's the facts. And he might still be the 2nd best we got. Don't know anything about Ghee, Williams has never played, and Butler didn't do much or get to do much last season. So as bad as he was/is, he has a good shot to start in 2014. And Wright gets hurt a lot.
TGDean Spanos Should Get Ass Cancer Of The Ass!
sigpic
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Panama View PostSo you think it's better to use that roster spot on a scrub at another position that will be deactivated each week? Remember, 5 roster players can't play each week.
Steve asked which position could we dump to make room for an extra tight end. I think we need all the blockers we can get. So I thought going with 2 QBs was a good answer. But, if the 3rd QB spot doesn't count as a roster spot and an extra tight end spot would count as a roster spot, then you are right and I am wrong.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by thelightningwill View PostIf you put it that way, you might be right.
Steve asked which position could we dump to make room for an extra tight end. I think we need all the blockers we can get. So I thought going with 2 QBs was a good answer. But, if the 3rd QB spot doesn't count as a roster spot and an extra tight end spot would count as a roster spot, then you are right and I am wrong.Adipose
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Panama View PostWell, they all count as roster spots. But I'm not sure how the rule changes regarding 3rd QBs work. Anyway, 5 players have to be declared inactive prior to the game, and I would just assume Sorensen be one of those 5 instead of some other position. We'll see what TT does.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment