Originally posted by gzubeck
View Post
And With The 5th Pick Of The NFL Draft Chargers Select....Discussion
Collapse
X
-
That was a terrible trade to move down from 5 to 9Originally posted by gzubeck View Post
WTF...Nothing like getting a ham sandwich and a bag of Doritos for #5. That's the best we can do?
Now, if the Bears wanted to add a pick from a Fields trade and another 4th rounder in 2024 - might be tracking
So two thirds and a 4th in 2024 and the pick in 2025 plus the 9th pick
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
5] LA Chargers: Joe Alt/T/Notre Dame
At the combine, I consistently heard that the Chargers will look for an offensive tackle or trade down if they like the offer on the table.
DT Peter Woods, LB CJ Allen, OC Iapani Laloulu, NT Dontay Corleone, ED Matayo Uiagalelei, LT Trey Zuhn, TE Justin Joly, LB Eric Gentry
TE Cade Otton, QB Kenny Pickett, CB Josh Jobe
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
If the Bears are going to do anything OTHER than draft Caleb Williams, they'd be far better served to trade out of the pick.Originally posted by charger1_sj View PostActually not sure why the Bears would even consider such a trade. They could stay put and pick up a stud WR, TE, Edge or OT @ 9.
Especially true if Arizona takes QB. That would leave a top 5 guy @9. Doesn't make much sense if you ask me.
Like (fr'instance) let's say the Bears wanted Joe Alt. They *could* take him first overall, but there'd be no reason to, since they could easily trade out of the pick (for a boatload) and still get Alt later.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Exactly. And they also own the #9 pick. With at least 3 QBs going in the top 5, it would leave the Bears in great position to draft a top 5 non QB prospect.Originally posted by Ghost of Quacksaw View Post
If the Bears are going to do anything OTHER than draft Caleb Williams, they'd be far better served to trade out of the pick.
Like (fr'instance) let's say the Bears wanted Joe Alt. They *could* take him first overall, but there'd be no reason to, since they could easily trade out of the pick (for a boatload) and still get Alt later.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Just move down one spot and get an easy 2nd rounder from Washington who would gladly pay that price for Caleb. Then they can draft one of the other QBs at #2. Plenty of time to gather all the info for their #1 pick and who they want QBing their team.Originally posted by Ghost of Quacksaw View Post
If the Bears are going to do anything OTHER than draft Caleb Williams, they'd be far better served to trade out of the pick.
Like (fr'instance) let's say the Bears wanted Joe Alt. They *could* take him first overall, but there'd be no reason to, since they could easily trade out of the pick (for a boatload) and still get Alt later.Chiefs won the Superbowl with 10 Rookies....
"Locked, Cocked, and ready to Rock!" Jim Harbaugh

- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
If I were Washington I'd be happy staying at #2. Of course we don't know how they value the top 3 QB candidates. But that's not a move I wouldOriginally posted by gzubeck View Post
Just move down one spot and get an easy 2nd rounder from Washington who would gladly pay that price for Caleb. Then they can draft one of the other QBs at #2. Plenty of time to gather all the info for their #1 pick and who they want QBing their team.
make. Look at what happened to Carolina. Miami took Tua over Herbert. If they miss @ 2 the GM could say we didn't really have a choice.
If they miss @ 1 the GM would be in serious trouble.
Of course if Williams is really that much better than the next two QBs and that's the way Washington see it, then they would make the move.
But I don't think so. Williams has never played in a Pro Style offense. Neither has Maye or Daniels. McCarthy has and it's one reason
he's moved up the boards. For me Williams is still a risk.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Washington wants Caleb because of their OC and he's a hometown kid. They can live with Daniels as well..So, unless you are sold on Williams the Bears can easily move down.Originally posted by charger1_sj View Post
If I were Washington I'd be happy staying at #2. Of course we don't know how they value the top 3 QB candidates. But that's not a move I would
make. Look at what happened to Carolina. Miami took Tua over Herbert. If they miss @ 2 the GM could say we didn't really have a choice.
If they miss @ 1 the GM would be in serious trouble.
Of course if Williams is really that much better than the next two QBs and that's the way Washington see it, then they would make the move.
But I don't think so. Williams has never played in a Pro Style offense. Neither has Maye or Daniels. McCarthy has and it's one reason
he's moved up the boards. For me Williams is still a risk.Chiefs won the Superbowl with 10 Rookies....
"Locked, Cocked, and ready to Rock!" Jim Harbaugh

- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
OK, lets say the Bears are not sold on Williams. They trade with Washington. Washington takes Daniels, oops. The GM along with the HC, scouts andOriginally posted by gzubeck View Post
Washington wants Caleb because of their OC and he's a hometown kid. They can live with Daniels as well..So, unless you are sold on Williams the Bears can easily move down.
the rest of the coaching staff has a say. It's not solely the OC's call.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
I think you mean Williams. All I'm saying is Chicago has options...they can either take Williams OR move down for additional picks inside the top 4 picks. If I was Chicago I could live with either Maye or Daniels... but that's just me...Originally posted by charger1_sj View Post
OK, lets say the Bears are not sold on Williams. They trade with Washington. Washington takes Daniels, oops. The GM along with the HC, scouts and
the rest of the coaching staff has a say. It's not solely the OC's call.
Chiefs won the Superbowl with 10 Rookies....
"Locked, Cocked, and ready to Rock!" Jim Harbaugh

-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment