Originally posted by dmac_bolt
View Post
AFC West Updates
Collapse
X
-
- Top
- Bottom
-
-
Originally posted by Maniaque 6 View PostOnly 14 players from the 100 are in AFCW ?
Something goes wrong somewhere and it's not coaching !
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by powderblueboy View Post
How about Slater? How about Keenan, if he returns to old form? How about Linsley .... one guy ranked him as the 5th best interior offensive lineman?
Players and coaches vote the top 100.
Keenan played great after he came back but perhaps not enough,... though he played 9-10 games. Hopkins missed a lot of games and was #90 so not sure how he made it.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Velo View Post
I only see two maybe three Chargers who legit belong in the top 100. Herbert, Ekeler and probably James. Bosa - nope. Mack - maybe (I hope he proves it this season!). Kendricks - I don't think so.
I posted earlier that I was watching Saquon Barkley highlights from last season. He faced the Vikes twice and play after play Kendricks was either getting trukked or blocked off the play. There is a reason the Vikes let him go. Maybe he proves me wrong, I hope so. But top 100 going into the season? No.
I hope Herbert noticed that he was #32 and Mahomes, Hurts, Burrow and Allen were all top 10. Maybe some fuel
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
I was listening to NFL channel on the radio and they pointed out that the Chiefs team that won last year's superbowl only had 11 players on it that were on the team when they won their first superbowl, what, 3 years ago? When you consider that and the fact that the Chiefs have very few true stars (Jones, Mahomes, Kelce, Thuney) it really shows what a terrific front office and coaching staff they have. They just keep reloading. We may be looking at the new Patriots.
TGLike, how am I a traitor? Your team are traitors.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lefty2SLO View Post
Like thinking that the team has found multiple creative ways to beat themselves in the past, so it's reasonable to assume that that trend might continue? That seems like a logical prediction based on past performance, doesn't it?
Thnking that that play predicts the next game they will have a completely different bad play to me is just superstition, I’m not superstitious as it’s false dark religious bullshit. But I get how superstitious black magic voodoo-fearing guys might feel differently.“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heatmiser View PostI was listening to NFL channel on the radio and they pointed out that the Chiefs team that won last year's superbowl only had 11 players on it that were on the team when they won their first superbowl, what, 3 years ago? When you consider that and the fact that the Chiefs have very few true stars (Jones, Mahomes, Kelce, Thuney) it really shows what a terrific front office and coaching staff they have. They just keep reloading. We may be looking at the new Patriots.
TG
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richpjr View Post
A HOF fame coach and keeping your 4 best superstars on the roster and playing without major injuries makes everyone look good but I agree - their FO deserves a ton of credit.“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post
Sometimes yes, in the specific case of of KC game 1 last year, I’d say no, I don’t expect Herbie to throw a ball 4 yards and have the TE jump out of the way of it so it goes to the DB behind him again.
Thnking that that play predicts the next game they will have a completely different bad play to me is just superstition, I’m not superstitious as it’s false dark religious bullshit. But I get how superstitious black magic voodoo-fearing guys might feel differently.
My comment was in reference to the 'chargering' discussion that's going on. I'm not sure what you're talking about here . . . . . . . .
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment