Originally posted by Riverwalk
View Post
Official Charger Season Discussion - News - Roster Moves - Injuries
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Xenos View Post
If you want an immediate starter, then we should have drafted for PON like maybe TE. But many people on this board hated drafting for need and wanted BPA regardless of position instead.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by richpjr View Post
Actually 12, not 11. If they caught their roughly 5 per game that they average they'd be 7 behind after 8 games played and that is just not significant enough to really matter.
at a rate higher than we currently do.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt4Knob View Post
BPA or PON is always a fine line to walk. And for a player like QJ - at 21 was he REALLY that much better than the next person on your draft board. If at 21 QJ was your 17th best player and Kincaid was 18 (and it’sa close 17 to 18) - I think you go PON. If QJ was like 14 and the next best was whatever player was 19 - you take BPA since you have judged the talent gap that much larger.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richpjr View Post
I think QJ was draft to fill a PON next year when we have to move on from some big contracts. Not everyone drafts players to start right away - see Patrick Mahomes.
Those that don't make it get cut or traded with no second contract. But getting back to the post, most 1st rounders start in their rookie year. The caveat is if
the team is loaded. The Chargers thought we had a loaded team. Unfortunately the record says that's not the case.
And if you look at the Chargers draft you have to go back to 2007 as the year our first rounder did not start immediately. That guy was Buster Davis and turned
out to be a bust.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Xenos View Post
I can also see drafting a WR in the first over a TE since TEs in the first have a very low success rate compared to getting them in the other rounds.
The problem is most likely due to how the NFL views TEs. You want a guy that can catch and block. But that almost never occurs. You either go for
a guy that's a receiving threat or a blocker. I prefer a receiving threat. You want a blocker insert an O line guy.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lefty2SLO View Post
Finally . . . . . . . . . at least a season too late - but . . . . . . . . . . . finally
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
The question is, where are we right at this moment, as fans, with the Chargers ?
There is Pipkins, Palmer, K9...that is what we have to build with.
Should the Chargers become successful again, I would expect it to be in the form of everything coming together, all at once.
Logic and reason would be defied.
It would involve something, say a win over KC, which catapults us.We do not play modern football.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt4Knob View Post
Really needed to draft one in this past draft which by all accounts, including Telesco - was the best TE class in years
Granted, I do think Bowers is a special player but not sure he has the blocking part down.
Vannett is just there to block. They don't need him to be a receiver - they need him to block.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ChargersPowderBlue View Post
I think Vannett can do stuff in the receiving game. Hopefully he brings more to the table than Mckitty.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment