Official Charger Season Discussion - News - Roster Moves - Injuries

[Lefty2SLO]

Skeptic 101 says 'SHOW ME you don't suck.

Man - we really need the draft (or more FA) - so we can argue about something new . . . . . !

[Boltnut]

Skeptic 101 says 'SHOW ME you don't suck.

Logic 101 says that if you finished 10-7 (during an injury plagued year)... you don't "suck".

[charger1_sj]

Logic 101 says that if you finished 10-7 (during an injury plagued year)... you don't "suck".

What does it say if you lose a game after having a 27 point lead? Logic 201.

[electricgold]

Logic 101 says that if you finished 10-7 (during an injury plagued year)... you don't "suck".

The Chargers don't suck, but when you have a QB of this caliber, no playoffs year 1, one and done year 2 means the coaching could be better, and has to be better.

[wu-dai clan]

My latest fixation has been on fixing the defensive front, with EDGE depth and IDL skill set being the focus.

The problem is that the people I like will be gone, or they are not exactly what we are looking for, or else they would be an overdraft.

So we have Lukas Van Ness, Calijah Kancey, Nolan Smith, Brian Bresee, Drew Sanders, et al.

I am at a loss as to what Staley is up to, but then again, this is the scheme we will run.

We want some inside pressure, with 1.5 Gappers.

I am guessing the reason Fehoko is gone is because, although he made plays, he was freelancing and not having gap discipline.

The evolution of StaleyD continues.

All this at once continues to be puzzling, but draft someone we will.



...back to the gummies...you figure it out.

[dmac_bolt]

Pollyanna 101 is that *no* losses are coaches losses. Another "immutable" fact. It's injuries; it's the other team(s) got lucky; it was a fluke; it's spinning a 27-0 lead into "just a 1-pt loss". LOL!

Lol, life has many more variables than your mind can comprehend at one time. You guys are single-point failure mode fanatics.

[charger1_sj]

My latest fixation has been on fixing the defensive front, with EDGE depth and IDL skill set being the focus.

The problem is that the people I like will be gone, or they are not exactly what we are looking for, or else they would be an overdraft.

So we have Lukas Van Ness, Calijah Kancey, Nolan Smith, Brian Bresee, Drew Sanders, et al.

I am at a loss as to what Staley is up to, but then again, this is the scheme we will run.

We want some inside pressure, with 1.5 Gappers.

I am guessing the reason Fehoko is gone is because, although he made plays, he was freelancing and not having gap discipline.

The evolution of StaleyD continues.

All this at once continues to be puzzling, but draft someone we will.



...back to the gummies...you figure it out.

Translation: Staley's defense is at the cell level, the goal is mammal level. He has a long ways to evolve.

[Boltjolt]

My latest fixation has been on fixing the defensive front, with EDGE depth and IDL skill set being the focus.

The problem is that the people I like will be gone, or they are not exactly what we are looking for, or else they would be an overdraft.

So we have Lukas Van Ness, Calijah Kancey, Nolan Smith, Brian Bresee, Drew Sanders, et al.

I am at a loss as to what Staley is up to, but then again, this is the scheme we will run.

We want some inside pressure, with 1.5 Gappers.

I am guessing the reason Fehoko is gone is because, although he made plays, he was freelancing and not having gap discipline.

The evolution of StaleyD continues.

All this at once continues to be puzzling, but draft someone we will.



...back to the gummies...you figure it out.

Good alternative for Sanders if we miss out is Campbell. I like Sanders because he can do two things similar to Parsons. Sanders is just scratching the surface as a really good ILB.

Campbell won't offer edge rushing but he would be a solid pick round 2 IF he is there.

So many directions we can go.

Not Resigning Fehoko was a miss for Telesco imo. Not sure what it is they don't quite like about him to keep holding him back like they have.

[QSmokey]

Lol, life has many more variables than your mind can comprehend at one time. You guys are single-point failure mode fanatics.

Now you're a sage. Wow, how can SO MUCH be contained on one person! LOL!

It's not ALL about the coaching, this is true. But I'm not one for making excuses about the other team getting lucky (which makes us unlucky, I guess); or the officiating; or the injuries; or a fluke. Nor do I try and spin catastrophic chokes into 1-pt losses. Coaching, IMO, is a big part of why we aren't successful as a team.

[Maniaque 6]

The Hochuli's affair
The McCree's foolish mistake
The numerous FGs missed in playoff ( NYJ, JAX ... )
The very bad PI call in the end zone against LV 2 years ago

It's official, it is the coach's fault

[dmac_bolt]

The Hochuli's affair
The McCree's foolish mistake
The numerous FGs missed in playoff ( NYJ, JAX ... )
The very bad PI call in the end zone against LV 2 years ago

It's official, it is the coach's fault

Right? A good coach wouldn’t miss a FG, thats just fact. What smoke cannot do is separate a tough loss vs a bad team or bad coaching staff. He thinks there is no way you can lose if not for one or both of those to be true. We know better.

Thats why I’m universally recognized as a wise sage. Yes, even by smoke. i have a gift, I only wish I could impart it, I’d find joy in sharing the blessing

[QSmokey]

The Hochuli affair
The McCree's foolish mistake
The numerous FGs missed in playoff ( NYJ, JAX ... )
The very bad PI call in the end zone against LV 2 years ago

It's official, it is the coach's fault

So subjective. I'm sure the LV fans wouldn't be so quick to agree. In addition, the officiating tends to equal out. I've said that many times. For each 'bad' call against us, we've benefited by equally 'bad' calls. The ONLY exception to that was the Hochuli blunder; that was an epic fail, and well documented as such. Hell, even Hochuli apologized for that call. Has that ever happened before (or since)?

And, like I said, it's not ALL about the coaching. Or did you just blow past that comment because it didn't help the point you were trying to make?