The Offensive Line - Okung Could Miss All Of Camp

[Caslon]

A solid OL unit would be nice. The '95 team. It was a given that that group ruled the locker room and morale.
Wanna see some of that.

Serious OL "booo yaa" needed this year (to go all the way).

LAmp, you better be a part of that. Or...TT tell us you missed on that pick, Dice roll.

[Xenos]

Podcast debate on the importance of OL with some transcript.I do wonder if we are a hybrid offense like Indy (one that utilizes quick strikes but also like to go vertical ala Air Coryell).

https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/07/02/top-offensive-linemen-tackles-centers-guards-ot-ol-zack-martin-david-bakhtiari-podcast

GARY: The question we'll start with is this: Do you need to invest big to get star, headlining offensive lineman in the NFL? Or is the goal more--and we've talked about this a little bit over the years--just to get an offensive line that isn't disastrously bad, that is simply good enough to allow you to function?

ANDY: Yeah, we've gone over this before and it's a moving argument. I think a lot of it begins with who you have at quarterback and how you play--every offense takes on the shape of its quarterback. If you have a guy who's getting the ball out quickly, if you're the New England Patriots, for example, you don't need to re-sign Nate Solder for top-end money, or Trent Brown for top-end money. You can get by with mid-round draft picks, or even an undrafted center like David Andrews, who's gotten a lot better over time because you have a quarterback that controls the protections and gets the ball out on three- and five-step timing pretty often. But if you're the Philadelphia Eagles, for example, and theirs is kind of a quick-strike offense, but Carson Wentz tends to play late into the down within the pocket. Then it's a different conversation. The Eagles have a lot of good offensive linemen.

ANDY: The one that complicates it for me, Gary, is the Indianapolis Colts. They are kind of somewhere in between--they've got the superstar QB, they get the ball out quickly, and yet they invested heavily in their offensive line. And I thought that was overkill. I didn't love the Quenton Nelson pick because I thought they needed more help on defense and Luck could compensate for a bad line. But there's no doubt that that offensive line in Indianapolis was the biggest reason that team looked like a contender last year, which means I was wrong about Nelson and wrong about the approach. Investing in the O-line helped them a lot. So I don't know where I stand on this now.

GARY: And just to be clear, conceptually you didn't like the Nelson pick, Andy. You didn't like the Colts taking an offensive lineman. I just wanted to point that out before this turns into another out-of-context 20-second Twitter clip.

ANDY: I was fine with Nelson, the linemen that they took, but I didn't like them taking a lineman in general at that pick. And again, I was more than wrong about that one.

GARY: So to me I think at this point investing in a great offensive line and trying to build a "good enough" offensive line is almost the same thing. That "good enough" line costs big money at this point. Nate Solder isn't a game-changing tackle, but he was solid in New England--a little less than that in his first year in New York--and look what they had to pay for him. You can go back to the Vikings signing Riley Reiff and Mike Remmers--Remmers is probably a swing tackle. But they had to pay those guys big money.

ANDY: And Remmers was a disaster, so they wound up getting rid of him and now they're trying it all over again with Josh Kline. But it's like you said with Solder, the left tackles not a game changer. The problem I've had for a long time, and I'm just having a conversation now, is: Name one tackle that is a game-changer. Because you can't really do much to scheme with your offensive line unless you are a super run-heavy team, and there are more teams starting to do that again. Dallas, Baltimore, all those teams should be investing in offensive linemen. But for the most part it's a quick-strike passing NFL, and you can't gain an advantage with your offensive linemen. All they are are insurance policies, for their pass protection. And they're really expensive insurance policies.

GARY: Well, I would have answered your question with Tyron Smith. I would also, I guess, point out that if you look at the Texans--and it's obvious to see the problems on their offensive line because they gave up the most sacks in football last year--but their offensive line was so bad that it changed the way they played.

ANDY: Yes, they had to accommodate it with keeping an extra blocker in, which now you're changing your offense to make up for the fact that you don't have five guys who can block. And your quarterback, in his second year I thought took a step back at times because he didn't trust is offensive line. Deshaun Watson played a little bit rushed in the pocket, he held the ball at times, and it's partly because the guys who would have been his eligible receivers were staying in and blocking and helping those offensive linemen who struggled. It's like you almost need a sweet spot, like if you were to give a letter grade and C is an average offensive line, and A is a Pro Bowl offensive line, you need at least a B to run your offense.

GARY: And I feel like you have to built it through the draft at this point, almost more than any other position.

ANDY: Here's the challenge that comes with that. Let's say the lineman is talented but he's not quite ready to play mentally. Well, you can't have that at the offensive line. You have to react to immediate pressure and pressure designs, and defensive fronts are getting more creative by the week in the NFL. It takes a lot of intelligence to play offensive line. There was a stereotype many years ago that it was just big dumb meatheads, but offensive linemen, next to quarterbacks, they're the smartest players on the field almost always. Especially as you move inside, the center position and even some of the guard positions where you get a lot of bodies around you.

ANDY: So yeah, you draft them because they're so expensive in free agency, which is happening at other positions. But you've got to have a guy that can also be counted on, mentally, right now. And you know what, Gary, there's a reason offensive line coaches tend to be the highest-paid assistants on every staff, next to coordinators. And there's a reason that once you're an offensive line coach that's pretty much where you stay, because when the team finds a good one, they grab on to that guy. You need teachers in that role.

THE MMQB PODCAST TOP 10 OFFENSIVE LINEMEN FOR 2019


"Others receiving votes" is included if you listen to the show, along with more offensive line discussions including whether or not to spend big on the O-line, the value of the center position, and a Q&A with Tampa Bay Bucs left tackle Donovan Smith. Position ranking voting is AP Poll-style among three panelists, with Andy's votes counting double:

1. Zack Martin, G, Dallas, 78 points (2 first-place votes)
2. David Bakhtiari, OT, Green Bay, 75 (1)
3. Jason Kelce, C, Philadelphia, 69
4. Tyron Smith, OT, Dallas, 58
5. Travis Frederick, C, Dallas, 56
6. Quenton Nelson, G, Indianapolis, 52
7. David DeCastro, G, Pittsburgh, 51
8. Mitchell Schwartz, OT, Kansas City, 48
9. Maurkice Pouncey, C, Pittsburgh, 47
10. Trent Williams, OT, Washington, 44

[wu-dai clan]

Xenos, to me, what gets our whole offense humming is when Gordon and Ekeler start getting sprung for big gains.

This involves, say, Pouncey or Feeney or Tevi finding work at the second level.

Our system involves the offensive tackles pulling...unusual stuff.

I would definitely say we are hybrid.

This flummoxes all of us fans and draftniks...it's unorthodoxed.

As you know Xenos, props to NFL savant, Duffman.

And c'mon Gary, it's Dante Scarnecchia...NE IOL does lots of dirty, scrappy, coordinated, great blocking.

[blueman]

What sucks is when Pouncey falls down, Tevi gets stuck on his initial block, and Feeney can't figure out who he is to block at the next level. All of these things need to not happen, on the same play, multiple times per drive, all game long, throughout the season. But not being a greedy bugger, I'll settle for slightly more often having things go right for whomever we trot out at those positions, cuz that will translate to even better O production. We were good, but need to be better to win it all.

[dmac_bolt]

I would probably leave Feeney at LG but his college experience was at RG. Lamp played LT so LG might be miore familiar. They say everything happens faster inside (OG vs OT). I dunno. The coaches will have to make that choice.

Feeney didn't play well at LG at all, so i'd be very open to trying him at RG. 2018 LG performance is not the continuity one wants to retain.

[sonorajim]

Feeney didn't play well at LG at all, so i'd be very open to trying him at RG. 2018 LG performance is not the continuity one wants to retain.

Yeah. I wouldn't want him to play the same as in 2018 at any position. He needs to demonstrate smoother reads, decision making & transitions this TC & preseason. He has the physical skills to be better than avg. There's hope that something will click for him this year. Maybe a return to his college position will help. Initially he started at LG for the Chargers next to C Pulley when Slauson went down- and looked better doing it. Kind of a head scratcher for me that his play regressed. We'll see.

[Maniaque 6]

Street and Smith's predict the same OL than last year.
Lamp as the backup at RG.
Scott as the backup at RT.

[blueman]

Street and Smith's predict the same OL than last year.
Lamp as the backup at RG.
Scott as the backup at RT.

Wow, just, wow.

[Panamamike]

Street and Smith's predict the same OL than last year.
Lamp as the backup at RG.
Scott as the backup at RT.

I will file this under "their projection means diddly". IMO Lamp will be a starter. I do not think it will be handed to him, i think he will earn it in camp.

[Topcat]

What sucks is when Pouncey falls down, Tevi gets stuck on his initial block, and Feeney can't figure out who he is to block at the next level. All of these things need to not happen, on the same play, multiple times per drive, all game long, throughout the season. But not being a greedy bugger, I'll settle for slightly more often having things go right for whomever we trot out at those positions, cuz that will translate to even better O production. We were good, but need to be better to win it all.

You forgot to mention:

Tevi getting beat for 7 sacks last year...
Feeney getting burned for 6.5 sacks last year...

[Topcat]

If any of you think Tevi is bad, Lombardi does an interesting analysis of La'el Collins at RT for the Cowboys. Voch credits Collins with at least 8.5 sacks allowed last year. And imagine, a lot of teams passed on Collins on draft day due to his connection, (he was later cleared) with a murder. A lot of us thought the Bolts should have taken a flyer on him...

Link: https://youtu.be/Nf76WY5P7jw

[sonorajim]

What sucks is when Pouncey falls down, Tevi gets stuck on his initial block, and Feeney can't figure out who he is to block at the next level. All of these things need to not happen, on the same play, multiple times per drive, all game long, throughout the season. But not being a greedy bugger, I'll settle for slightly more often having things go right for whomever we trot out at those positions, cuz that will translate to even better O production. We were good, but need to be better to win it all.

Presumably the Chargers could beat most NFL teams using blocking sleds for OL. We were the 5th rated passing offense with last year's OL. Imagine our historic greatness if we had blocking!

The OL should be better in their 2nd-3rd year starting together, possibly a new talent starting (Lamp).
Okung - 3rd yr
Schofield - 3rd yr
Feeney - 2.5th yr
Tevi - 2.5th yr
Pouncey - 2nd yr
Lamp - 1st yr?