Tweet
Originally posted by Parcells
View Post
-
Just imagine Herb gettin cracked by Crosby twice a year because TTs RT projects werent replaced.Herb is the franchise,protect the franchise. -
In the 2nd or 3rd round, yes.Originally posted by Boltgang74 View Post
Maybe in FA.
But not in the 1st, please.Comment
-
No, but a RT can help keep the opposing RB on the sideline, where he can't gash the Bolts' defense.Originally posted by Maniaque 6 View PostComment
-
McShay's latest mock draft has us trading trading with the Steelers (rumblings are they want Malik Willis) and then taking Jordan Davis at 20. The Jordan Davis part of it aside, thoughts on trading back with the Steelers generally? If the the Steelers pick a QB at #17, I don't think moving back to #20 will matter much for us given that its the Saints at #18 (I suspect they want a QB or WR) and then the Eagles with their third pick of the first round at #19 (they don't need Jordan Davis or a RT, but someone like Ojabo, Dean or McDuffie if he somehow lasts that long could go there).Comment
-
We have so many PONs, that I wouldn't mind trading down a few spots provided we get a decent additional pick for the trade down. This would be predicated, of course, that some of our #1 graded players are still available at #20. I'm just hoping that TT & Staley are working BTW on this and every other potential scenario that would benefit us in the draft. Earn your keep, Tom, and please listen to Brandon's advice.Originally posted by SK21209 View PostComment
-
Let's get greedy.Originally posted by SK21209 View Post
How about a bidding war between PIT & NO ?
They both want one particular QB.
They each know of the others preference.
NO would have to trade up one spot.
And offer more than PIT.
Maybe some cap relief can get thrown in, with a new LAC extension.
There are several NO players we have to like.
The Lombardi, Wilhoite connection.
Hmmmmm.We do not play modern football.Comment
-
Kennedy Brooks is RB that somehow has been under the radar and projected to go 5th or 6th for some reason. I know he’s not the fastest and doesn’t have a lot of receptions(he can learn). But he seems to be a patient runner and does not go down easy. All he has done in 3 seasons is.
Rushing Yards- 3,320
Rushing TDs- 31
YPC- 7
If he is there in the 5th, I would draft him in a heart beat. I would take him in the 3rd or 4th if the Chargers didn’t have bigger needs.Comment
-
I have trouble imagining a #17 rookie OT dominating Max Crosby. We are not likely to draft a Slater clone there. We did a lousy job as a team vs Crosby Jan 9. Where was Crosby Oct 14?Originally posted by Boltgang74 View Post
This is not an argument against an OT at 17 if he's an actual best player available. With or without a R OT, we have to do a better job providing help vs a top edge that's on fire.Comment
-
I don't mind moving back a few spots but depends on who is on the board. I'm not in on the Jordon Davis bandwagon. I'd pass on him for others.Originally posted by SK21209 View PostComment
-
Agree on not wanting Jordan Davis in the first. There are certain things that make me wonder if he is the guy to become truly elite. I don’t like the idea of spending a first on a guy won’t be making an impact on passing downs in a passing league. The run D needs to get better, and it starts with the D line. But between free agency and picks in the 2nd and 3rd, I’d rather use the first on something other than Davis.Originally posted by Boltjolt View PostComment
-
Want them to throw Murray in a trade down to get Devin Lloyd, long as we’re dreaming.Comment
-
PON starters? Hard to say without knowing how we handle resigning our own. I have one - DT.Originally posted by Berserker76 View Post
Regards RT, they need to give Pipkins a shot. Draft a #2.Comment
Comment