Ghelkin says his gut (no hints from the team) says we will pick defense with our first pick.
2016 Official Draft Thread
Collapse
X
-
I just don't see a major difference between the guys at the top of the draft, vs the guys later on. The guys at the top are better athletes, but not as strong players. It is hard to get too excited at the top of the draft this year. Good, but not elite prospects.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostI just don't see a major difference between the guys at the top of the draft, vs the guys later on. The guys at the top are better athletes, but not as strong players. It is hard to get too excited at the top of the draft this year. Good, but not elite prospects.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
By the way, we've all seen this happen before, but is there any chance that some QB-hungry team might panic and want to trade into the #3 spot for Lynch? Which means that QBs go 1-2-3 and we're further down (#8...Philly?) with an extra pick or two?
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by QSmokey View PostMore easily said than done. I have always contended that finding a suitable trade partner - willing to offer enough to make a trade worthwhile - is not as easy as some here seem to think.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richpjr View PostIf QBs are the first 2 picks as expected now, I think it will be extremely difficult to trade down from 3. There are enough good players in the top 10 that a team would be kind of foolish to pay the price needed to trade up.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richpjr View PostI'd take Stanley plus several other players rather than trade back up to get Tunsil.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 6025 View PostI think if the Titans really wanted Tunsil they would've stayed at #1.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Maverick View PostNot necessarily----if they were fairly certain that 2 QBs would be taken at #1 & #2, that they could fleece the Rams for multiple first rounders & second rounders, & that they could trade back up (possibly with US to #3), then maybe they had a plan to get Tunsil lower all along. That's not too far-fetched, imho.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment