2019 Draft Prospects To Keep An Eye On

[Topcat]

CBS sports composite board....difficult sett8ng.

i got poached in the 2nd for the top safeties....Thornhill went one pic' ahead. But Damn....I would be pleased with this haul....


28: R1P28

C GARRETT BRADBURY
NC STATE
60: R2P28

LB MACK WILSON
ALABAMA
91: R3P27

DL KHALEN SAUNDERS
WESTERN ILLINOIS
130: R4P28

OT MAX SCHARPING
N. ILLINOIS
166: R5P28

RB DEVINE OZIGBO
NEBRASKA
200: R6P27

WR JALEN HURD
BAYLOR
242: R7P28

S UGOCHUKWU AMADI
OREGON

I like the Saunders pick...right where I have him slotted in my mock...Bradbury is nice, no doubt about it, and with only one year left on Pouncey's deal, we need to groom the next C...are u saying Q-Berry isn't the answer?

[Bolts4ever213]

Good stuff guys, thanks

[like54ninjas]

Cool videography of Juan Thornhill. Love the kid's work ethic, quiet chip on his shoulder coming from a small HS program, and is looking to expand his opportunities.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NcKDnnAcFWs

Juan lead his HS team to 2 State Championships in football and 3 in basketball. Here is what he did as a Senior in the Championship game.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=g9iojwtuJbQ

[Panamamike]

I like the Saunders pick...right where I have him slotted in my mock...Bradbury is nice, no doubt about it, and with only one year left on Pouncey's deal, we need to groom the next C...are u saying Q-Berry isn't the answer?

I am saying he was the best player to choose IMO the way the mock unfolded. Q-Berry may or may not be The answer. Bradbury is a better player IMO, and OC is a key ositition to me. Q definitely does not make me avoid drafting the best OC who projects to be a top flight starter for the next 8 -10 yrs.

[wu-dai clan]

I am saying he was the best player to choose IMO the way the mock unfolded. Q-Berry may or may not be The answer. Bradbury is a better player IMO, and OC is a key ositition to me. Q definitely does not make me avoid drafting the best OC who projects to be a top flight starter for the next 8 -10 yrs.

Garrett Bradbury is a prospect I really like. The talk that he cannot anchor is noise. He looks fine against the monsters of the IDL. Sense of urgency, surprising power, elite out in space.

It is easy to get behind your vision here, especially after Lamp is spoken of in terms of his natural OT capability.

IOL: Feeney, Pouncey, Qberry, Bradbury.

OT: Okung, Tevi, Schofield, Lamp.

IOL is so important.

[Topcat]

I am saying he was the best player to choose IMO the way the mock unfolded. Q-Berry may or may not be The answer. Bradbury is a better player IMO, and OC is a key ositition to me. Q definitely does not make me avoid drafting the best OC who projects to be a top flight starter for the next 8 -10 yrs.

I sure would like to take care of RT earlier...I guess it depends on how high the Bolts have Bradbury rated compared to the O-tackles on the board when they pick, and the DT's also...

[like54ninjas]

I am saying he was the best player to choose IMO the way the mock unfolded. Q-Berry may or may not be The answer. Bradbury is a better player IMO, and OC is a key ositition to me. Q definitely does not make me avoid drafting the best OC who projects to be a top flight starter for the next 8 -10 yrs.

I actually like Qberry and yet Garrett could definitely be the BPA. I have no issues with picking him as he could easily be the anchor/pivot of our line for a decade. Upper tier talent is always welcome.

[like54ninjas]

Garrett Bradbury is a prospect I really like. The talk that he cannot anchor is noise. He looks fine against the monsters of the IDL. Sense of urgency, surprising power, elite out in space.

It is easy to get behind your vision here, especially after Lamp is spoken of in terms of his natural OT capability.

IOL: Feeney, Pouncey, Qberry, Bradbury.

OT: Okung, Tevi, Schofield, Lamp.

IOL is so important.

With the position flexibility of that group, the 5 starters could work out in several configurations.

[wu-dai clan]

With the position flexibility of that group, the 5 starters could work out in several configurations.

I forgot to mention Scharping. He projects to early round 4 IMV.

We would get a developmental OT there @ 130.

[like54ninjas]

I forgot to mention Scharping. He projects to early round 4 IMV.

We would get a developmental OT there @ 130.

Couple developmental prospects I like who may go late like Donnell Greene, Yosuah Nijman, Dennis Daley, William Sweet.

[Topcat]

I forgot to mention Scharping. He projects to early round 4 IMV.

We would get a developmental OT there @ 130.

Wood, do u think Scharping has a higher ceiling than Tevi?

[wu-dai clan]

Wood, do u think Scharping has a higher ceiling than Tevi?

Yes. But I believe AL about Tevi...doesn't mean I like it.

TT is gonna surprise us.