Who do we select at #6?

[MasterOfPuppets]

draft Herbert and groom him behind Philip for a year

[powderblueboy]

This is a well thought out rebuttal...but...to be fair, that was just a bad year. A ton of first round perennial starters on olines around the league for a reason...and when you have good RBs and WRs already, and adding quality to those ranks can definitely be accomplished by picks in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th rounds, and the oline is the worst component of your team...thats why you look hard in the first and second rounds for oline help, and scoff at the Lambs and Jeudys and Swifts...

Honestly, there are arguments for both approaches...but again...considering what our glaring weakness is, you gotta see why people are adamant about going big early...

Let's not forget QB!!!

Sorry Beach....we got Eke and JJ, we got KA and MDub...think we need another piece in both stables...but though we may not go OLine at 6, I very much doubt it would be Swift or Lamb. They are neither a big need or BPA...or even graded that high in my book.

A surprise addressing of the oline in FA, and a QB at 6...then maybe when can talk about Swift in the second.

draft is deep at wide out and rb, Chargers will wait....given their critical needs elsewhere.

You only take wide receiver if one of the guys is Randy Moss

[powderblueboy]

I see these 6 standing out for Telesco (in no particular order):

the more speed to defend KC draft:
1. Okudah
2. Simmons

the solve the gaping hole on the team draft:
1. Thomas
2. Wills

the lets finally move on draft:
1. Tua
2. Eason (trading down to #11 - where i think Eason goes)

[TTThunder]

1. A few here mentioned QB.Herbert...

I read somewhere that they are not sure that Herbert has it between the ears?!?

2. #6 overall should be used for an impact player that can have the most impact for our team....

(So for me, RB and WR are out....)

3. #6 overall should NEVER be used for a 'potential' prospect...

Go Bolts!!!

[powderblueboy]

1. A few here mentioned QB.Herbert...

I read somewhere that they are not sure that Herbert has it between the ears?!?

2. #6 overall should be used for an impact player that can have the most impact for our team....

(So for me, RB and WR are out....)

3. #6 overall should NEVER be used for a 'potential' prospect...

Go Bolts!!!

i read he has a 4.2 gpa at oregon

[like54ninjas]

i read he has a 4.2 gpa at oregon

Football IQ and processing don’t necessarily correlate to gpa.

Think of it like.......

[Topcat]

1. A few here mentioned QB.Herbert...

I read somewhere that they are not sure that Herbert has it between the ears?!?

2. #6 overall should be used for an impact player that can have the most impact for our team....

(So for me, RB and WR are out....)

3. #6 overall should NEVER be used for a 'potential' prospect...

Go Bolts!!!

We absolutely need to get our pick @6 right...if there's ANY doubt about a player, go with the safer, solid choice, with a proven track record, and preferably from a big time program...

[MasterOfPuppets]

1. A few here mentioned QB.Herbert...

I read somewhere that they are not sure that Herbert has it between the ears?!?

2. #6 overall should be used for an impact player that can have the most impact for our team....

(So for me, RB and WR are out....)

3. #6 overall should NEVER be used for a 'potential' prospect...

Go Bolts!!!

Name a QB drafted after the first 5-10 picks that didn't have question marks,

[Maniaque 6]

Name a QB drafted after the first 5-10 picks that didn't have question marks,

P. Mahomes ?

[powderblueboy]

P. Mahomes ?

Mahomes did a lot of weird crap that freaked out the scouting community. One thing was that he had the tendency not to set his feet before throwing the football. Many thought he wasn't a pocket qb.

[SDBORN]

Mahomes did a lot of weird crap that freaked out the scouting community. One thing was that he had the tendency not to set his feet before throwing the football. Many thought he wasn't a pocket qb.

What about ketchup on steak?

[Boltjolt]

What about ketchup on steak?

A NO for me lol