Originally posted by Parcells
View Post
Slater is better right now because Slater has virtually flawless technique whereas Penning displayed normal technique issues that are common in soon to be rookie OTs in the NFL and, frankly, common for all NFL players in general to have at their various positions, including Herbert. NFL players often fix or substantially improve on these issues even by the time of their pro days and also through an NFL training camp. Technique issues for rookies are the rule, not the exception.
Penning is nothing like Fluker. Fluker had movement issues as evidenced by his 5.31 40 and his 1.90 10 yard split. Penning ran a 4.89 40 and posted a 10 yard split of 1.71. The body types of the players are vastly different as well. They are completely dissimilar players.
If you are looking for a player comparison, Taylor Lewan is more appropriate. Lewan ran a 4.87 40 with a 1.70 split. Lewan is 6' 7" tall and weighs 309 pounds. Penning is 6' 7.125" and weighs 325 pounds. The knock on Lewan entering the league was that he looked a little stiff at times. Sound familiar?
IMO, the biggest difference between Lewan and Penning that I can see is that Penning seems to be very slightly bigger and stronger than Lewan, which is not an unfavorable difference. Lewan has gone on to make three Pro Bowls. He has not been the best OT ever, but he has been very good. I would expect a similar or maybe ever so slightly better career arc for Penning.
I think that is the most reasonable take based upon the information available, not some craziness that Penning is a plodder who is like D.J. Fluker when Penning has the movement skills to play LT in the NFL (as Lewan has), making his movement ability more than adequate to play RT in the NFL.
Comment