Originally posted by Kellyb72601
View Post
And With The 5th Pick Of The NFL Draft Chargers Select....Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by charger1_sj View Post
We ran the ball at will against Miami since they sold out to stop Herbert. We lost the game because the D was miserable. At the end we failed to pick
up the blitz. In fact if was the blitz that killed us at the end of games. That's a function of poor coaching, poor pre snap reads not OT blocking. Pipkins
had bad games against elite pass rushers. We did not help him as other teams do when this happens. Better TE help and RB blocking would fix the
issues. Better run game needs OGs and Center along with a decent RB. And by the way the blitz usually came from the left side not the right.
When we lost Williams and Allen for some games the offense went to shit. So WR is also a problem area. QJ did not solve the issue.“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
-
😞 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bman6555 View Post
Hugely. A WR has way more impact on team success than a TE. So if you're comparing elite TE vs elite WR for the same price you take the WR.
Lets take a look for example at Gates, he has 2 career 1000 yard seasons and he's a top HoF caliber TE.
Compare that with Allen, who while Pro Bowl Caliber is probably going to be fringe HoF caliber at best if he has enough longevity. Allen has 6 1000 yard seasons.
Look at the draft 3 years ago, even if Pitts had matched his projections, Atlanta still would be regretting passing on Chase given how he's turned out.Time to put my money where my mouth is: Hampton will be better than Jeanty!
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chargers8491 View PostWould people be pissed if the Chargers stayed @5 and drafted Bowers over MHJ? This is of course if they didn't make a trade although I think they will trade out of #5.
1. If Hortiz decided to stay at 5, I'm happy to assume there was not a great enough offer, and that's fine by me. "draft-rape" or nothing. how horrible is that term BTW?
2. Bowers may in fact be BPA and if Hortiz decided so, I have "new GM faith" in that.
3. Bowers is NOT a TE. I stopped calling him a TE months ago and encouraged ya'll to do the same. He is as far from a TE as he is a WR. You wouldn't call him a WR right? Yet he does many WR things. Why not call him a fullback? or RB? he does that too, and would likely be doing that here.
4. Roman. We have the 1 or maybe 2 or 3 OCs that would absolutely know how to utilize a special talent like Bowers, I think Payton is another and hope he doesnt land in Denver.
5. Roman. This offense is ahead of the pendulum swing. Our offense will be copied by everyone in the ensuing 5 years.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 21&500 View Post
Not I and this is why:
1. If Hortiz decided to stay at 5, I'm happy to assume there was not a great enough offer, and that's fine by me. "draft-rape" or nothing. how horrible is that term BTW?
2. Bowers may in fact be BPA and if Hortiz decided so, I have "new GM faith" in that.
3. Bowers is NOT a TE. I stopped calling him a TE months ago and encouraged ya'll to do the same. He is as far from a TE as he is a WR. You wouldn't call him a WR right? Yet he does many WR things. Why not call him a fullback? or RB? he does that too, and would likely be doing that here.
4. Roman. We have the 1 or maybe 2 or 3 OCs that would absolutely know how to utilize a special talent like Bowers, I think Payton is another and hope he doesnt land in Denver.
5. Roman. This offense is ahead of the pendulum swing. Our offense will be copied by everyone in the ensuing 5 years.Chiefs won the Superbowl with 10 Rookies....
"Locked, Cocked, and ready to Rock!" Jim Harbaugh
-
😂 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chargers8491 View PostWould people be pissed if the Chargers stayed @5 and drafted Bowers over MHJ? This is of course if they didn't make a trade although I think they will trade out of #5.
Personally I am NOT a fan of multiple trade downs just to accumulate a bunch of average dudes. Take the generational talent (whoever you think that is) and don't overthink it. Of course I his is assuming we aren't offered a king's ransom.
I still haven't gotten over passing up on Polamalu just to trade down and draft Sammy freaking Davis and Terrence Kiel. Never again.ESPN Screename: GoBolts02
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boltx View Post
I still haven't gotten over passing up on Polamalu just to trade down and draft Sammy freaking Davis and Terrence Kiel. Never again.
If Hortiz trades down and acquires a pick that's used to raft Braden Fiske, though, I would be geeked. Then again, Braden Fiske is no Terrance Kiel.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kellyb72601 View PostRE: the receivers, it's worth noting Marvin Harrison Jr. is a prototypical outside X receiver - the same position QJ was drafted to play. So you're gonna have 2 of those guys when your QB has proven he much prefers the slot? Nabers is a more direct replacement for Keenan - took over 50% of his snaps from the slot and had like 15 times the number of broken tackles as MHJ. Bowers can do it too. So Nabers or Bowers. If it comes down to it I think they have to go with the receiver due to the massive contract discount you get. Is there any scenario where they can trade down and still get Bowers?
Drafting someone to play the position and having the position filled is not the same thing.
And an offense focusing on slot receivers and tight ends is more bent towards taking advantage of PR's skills, not Herbert's.
I think Telesco never got out of that mind set.
He even said that his model for drafting a QB was PR.
Herbert is a different cat.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 21&500 View Post
Not I and this is why:
1. If Hortiz decided to stay at 5, I'm happy to assume there was not a great enough offer, and that's fine by me. "draft-rape" or nothing. how horrible is that term BTW?
2. Bowers may in fact be BPA and if Hortiz decided so, I have "new GM faith" in that.
3. Bowers is NOT a TE. I stopped calling him a TE months ago and encouraged ya'll to do the same. He is as far from a TE as he is a WR. You wouldn't call him a WR right? Yet he does many WR things. Why not call him a fullback? or RB? he does that too, and would likely be doing that here.
4. Roman. We have the 1 or maybe 2 or 3 OCs that would absolutely know how to utilize a special talent like Bowers, I think Payton is another and hope he doesnt land in Denver.
5. Roman. This offense is ahead of the pendulum swing. Our offense will be copied by everyone in the ensuing 5 years.
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment