Originally posted by richpjr
View Post
2024 Official Super Duper Mock Draft Thread - Opinions On Mocks | Pundit Mocks
Collapse
X
-
- Top
- Bottom
-
-
Originally posted by Topcat View Post
Yep, agree. To trade down from #5 to #10 and to ONLY get a next year's 2nd rounder from the Jets seems way too low...Jeremiah's been pretty good on mocks--he even predicted Derwin to us--but on this one, I think he's way off...
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by beachcomber View Post
not sure what the inference is there, and.... can pretty much guarantee that the guy is way off on @least a handful or so of the top half of guys.... just plain & simple bad info.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Traded with the Vikes for 11, 23 & 129. Some say that is too cheap, but I digress. The trade turned into DeJean, Mims & Sinnott. I doubled up on LB's in the mid rounds and also got Estime in the early 4th. I was scored a D for Nourzad by PFF, but I really like the kid and simply wanted him. I think I would be very happy with this draft personally.
image.png
-
🥰 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by La Costa Boy View PostTraded with the Vikes for 11, 23 & 129. Some say that is too cheap, but I digress. The trade turned into DeJean, Mims & Sinnott. I doubled up on LB's in the mid rounds and also got Estime in the early 4th. I was scored a D for Nourzad by PFF, but I really like the kid and simply wanted him. I think I would be very happy with this draft personally.
image.png
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by QSmokey View Post
Who gives the 'grades' to these picks? Is that part of the software?
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Let's say Vikes have a deal with Chargers for #5, then Giants trade up from #6 to #4 and take JJ. What to the Chargers do? Arizona may still get MHJ at #6.
I was confident, when the Vikes got that 2nd 1st that it was the Chargers they were targeting. BUT, #3 and #4 are in play and teams get desperate. I'm afraid we will miss out on the #11 & #23
-
😞 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Icebolt View PostLet's say Vikes have a deal with Chargers for #5, then Giants trade up from #6 to #4 and take JJ. What to the Chargers do? Arizona may still get MHJ at #6.
I was confident, when the Vikes got that 2nd 1st that it was the Chargers they were targeting. BUT, #3 and #4 are in play and teams get desperate. I'm afraid we will miss out on the #11 & #23
-
☕ 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by QSmokey View Post
Therefore, I'd give it an A-.
Big Fiske fan here, btw. There are a handful of guys I'd be geeked for the Bolts to have access to at #37, and Fiske is among them.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by La Costa Boy View Post
I firmly believe that if 3 trades that they want 11, 23 and a 2025 1st. I don't believe the Vikes have a second rounder in 2025 to play with. Now slot #4 would be a bit more interesting for what they would get in return. I think that a 2025 #1 included would be deemed too steep. I mean, 3 #1's to move 7 spots? That's the kind of move that gets a GM fired.
And I'm in full agreement here-- the deal has to pay off for the GM moving up, or it's ultimately his demise.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment