POLL: Is It Time To Bench Rivers?

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wu-dai clan
    Smooth Operation
    • May 2017
    • 13359
    • Send PM

    Originally posted by pacstud View Post
    14
    22
    26
    55
    63
    26*

    You're welcome
    You will explain this to morons like me later, right ?
    We do not play modern football.

    Comment

    • Critty
      Dominate the Day.
      • Mar 2019
      • 5580
      • Send PM

      Originally posted by Boltjolt View Post

      Hindsight is 20/20. Can't draft both Watson and Lamar Jackson. Wouldn't be smart.

      I would not have signed Earl Thomas.
      Its not hindsight.
      That was my opinion at the time.
      And yes, I could draft both Watson & Jackson.
      And I would have.

      The more mobile QB tend to get injured a bit more taking extra hits as a runner or extending plays.
      I would have been compelled to do so. Watson played half the season in 2017 and tore his ACL.

      The way I think....QB driven league. I would have wanted to take Jackson away from the other 31 teams. And to have insurance on Watson who was just injured.

      I would also build plays into the offense around them both. Slash & Slash section of the playbook. Zone read option with 2 QBs.

      It cant work people will say. How the heck do you run an offense with 2 QBs.

      I am not really.
      QB lines up in pistol with two RBs in backfield. Or RB and Hback in backfield. The RB happens to be the back up QB. He cab also line up in a slot or flank and motion in or out of backfield. I would get a lot of favorable matchups, especially in short yardage situations and redzone.

      If one gets injured. No worries. The Slash Slash section was bonus plays. The bulk of offense pro style zone read option.

      Am I crazy. Yes very crazy. Im putting my best weapons on the field at the same time.

      It will be called a gimmick and unsustainable.
      Wildcat is a gimmick because it did not have the pass option threat, so the extra blocker could be eliminated by bringing the safety down. It limited the offense to run only. It did not open more options.

      The manipulation of pass and run by them would be so much fun and score so many points.
      You need gifted QBs to run an entire playbook.

      Cheat codes: Watson & Jackson.
      Stop them from scoring.
      Whos running, whos throwing, who recieving.
      Who is doing what? The defense wont really know because the play has all the options, anything could happen.
      Who has it better than us?

      Comment

      • Critty
        Dominate the Day.
        • Mar 2019
        • 5580
        • Send PM

        Originally posted by wu-dai clan View Post

        You will explain this to morons like me later, right ?
        I think its a joke because fanatics of the team have opinions they post about what they wish could happen.

        So he posts Lotto numbers.
        But It isn't nearly enough to buy the team.
        Typical. His posts just are not good enough to do anything with.
        :rimshot:


        Who has it better than us?

        Comment

        • pacstud
          Black Belt Poster
          • Sep 2018
          • 359
          • Send PM

          Originally posted by Critty View Post

          I think its a joke because fanatics of the team have opinions they post about what they wish could happen.

          So he posts Lotto numbers.
          But It isn't nearly enough to buy the team.
          Typical. His posts just are not good enough to do anything with.
          :rimshot:

          Well played. Tbf your op was a tad grandiose. Post your misses crit.

          Comment

          • MagicMamba88
            Registered Charger Fan
            • Sep 2019
            • 2033
            • Send PM

            Comment

            • Boltjolt
              Dont let the PBs fool ya
              • Jun 2013
              • 26926
              • Henderson, NV
              • Send PM

              Originally posted by Critty View Post

              Its not hindsight.
              That was my opinion at the time.
              And yes, I could draft both Watson & Jackson.
              And I would have.

              The more mobile QB tend to get injured a bit more taking extra hits as a runner or extending plays.
              I would have been compelled to do so. Watson played half the season in 2017 and tore his ACL.

              The way I think....QB driven league. I would have wanted to take Jackson away from the other 31 teams. And to have insurance on Watson who was just injured.

              I would also build plays into the offense around them both. Slash & Slash section of the playbook. Zone read option with 2 QBs.

              It cant work people will say. How the heck do you run an offense with 2 QBs.

              I am not really.
              QB lines up in pistol with two RBs in backfield. Or RB and Hback in backfield. The RB happens to be the back up QB. He cab also line up in a slot or flank and motion in or out of backfield. I would get a lot of favorable matchups, especially in short yardage situations and redzone.

              If one gets injured. No worries. The Slash Slash section was bonus plays. The bulk of offense pro style zone read option.

              Am I crazy. Yes very crazy. Im putting my best weapons on the field at the same time.

              It will be called a gimmick and unsustainable.
              Wildcat is a gimmick because it did not have the pass option threat, so the extra blocker could be eliminated by bringing the safety down. It limited the offense to run only. It did not open more options.

              The manipulation of pass and run by them would be so much fun and score so many points.
              You need gifted QBs to run an entire playbook.

              Cheat codes: Watson & Jackson.
              Stop them from scoring.
              Whos running, whos throwing, who recieving.
              Who is doing what? The defense wont really know because the play has all the options, anything could happen.
              Not smart to draft Jackson after Watson regardless what you say. Who drafts 2 first round QBs within 2 years?

              Critty...who is a fan lol

              Comment

              • Critty
                Dominate the Day.
                • Mar 2019
                • 5580
                • Send PM

                Originally posted by pacstud View Post

                Well played. Tbf your op was a tad grandiose. Post your misses crit.
                Sure.
                l liked Manziel. That was a bust.
                I got others. But off top of my head that was a big whiff.

                I did not think Jackson was a WR like Polian.
                He looked like a dynamic QB to me.

                I thought DK Metcalf was a top 10 pick. He wasn't picked end 2nd rd. Who knows how he pans out.
                Looks like he is on the right team. He doesn't run great routes. I just like his size and deep speed. And I thought you cant teach size or speed.

                I would take Burrow #1.
                And would trade up into get him.
                He could bust. i dont think he will. I like him.



                Who has it better than us?

                Comment

                • Critty
                  Dominate the Day.
                  • Mar 2019
                  • 5580
                  • Send PM

                  Originally posted by Boltjolt View Post

                  Not smart to draft Jackson after Watson regardless what you say. Who drafts 2 first round QBs within 2 years?

                  Critty...who is a fan lol
                  Yes sir.
                  I will die out on that limb someday. But im going out on that limb because I think there is a great reward out there.
                  Who has it better than us?

                  Comment

                  • OhioBolt
                    Registered Charger Fan
                    • Jun 2013
                    • 2111
                    • Send PM

                    Not time to bench Rivers, but he needs to get me some more fantasy points!

                    Comment

                    • jamrock
                      lawyers, guns and money
                      • Sep 2017
                      • 13262
                      • Send PM

                      Defense held KC without a point 3 straight times in the 4th quarter. That should be enough for a decent club.

                      Comment

                      • Tol
                        From Accounting
                        • Mar 2019
                        • 997
                        • Carlsbad
                        • Send PM

                        Can we try the Stick out now?

                        Comment

                        • Critty
                          Dominate the Day.
                          • Mar 2019
                          • 5580
                          • Send PM

                          Originally posted by jamrock View Post
                          Defense held KC without a point 3 straight times in the 4th quarter. That should be enough for a decent club.
                          Yep.

                          Lions, Bronocs, Steelers, Raiders, Cheifs.

                          Rivers lost all these games with poor play. Especially late game poor play.

                          If they are going to try and go 5-0 down the stretch, Lynn has a decision to make at the bye.
                          Does he actually play Taylor or does he just do the old regroup and play Rivers the rest of year.

                          Taylor doesnt turn it over typically. Plus you can get a boost sometimes from a move like this.

                          I honestly did not think it could come to this.
                          But maybe Lynn should think about benching Rivers.


                          Who has it better than us?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X