Originally posted by charger1_sj
View Post
Former OC Kellen Moore - Discussion
Collapse
X
-
FYI, going by memory we have never promoted someone on our staff to HC. The opportunity to do so, especially during Telesco's time has been there.Originally posted by Fouts2herbert View Post
I like the Moore hire, it’s probably one of the smartest moves the Spanos have made in a good long while…as for that being a rant? Considering what I’ve read on these forums I’m not certain that even qualifies…sure I’m out on staley, and I’m also out on bosa, and I’m probably still not over jax, but this hire is definitely a step in the right direction and the only thing giving me a sliver of hope for 2023 and the future with herbert…IMO this move was all about making sure herbert would want to stay longterm with the chargers on contract extension…
It also pleases me to know that if staley can’t get his defense to play at a much higher level, then the chargers have someone that can take over the reigns going forward…I’m not a gambler but I’d almost be wiling to bet that if things continue the same on defense with staley, moore will likely be the ‘next man up’ to coach the chargers…
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Staley's offensive vision is but a part of Moore's offense.Originally posted by Xenos View Post
Popper brought up the week before that he believed Reich was the exception and the #1 choice hire for OC because of his credentials and experience as a play caller. Otherwise, they were going with someone from the Shanahan/McVay tree because that’s the scheme that Staley believed in. Moore represents an OC whose qualifications was good enough that Staley looked past the fact that he ran a “different” scheme. Similar to the Reich scenario. Does that make sense?
It will literally change on a week by week basis.
Think in terms of the midnite buffet on a luxury cruise liner.
Screens, motion, intricate "inter-weaving route concepts" are involved.
Slayer-MW-Palmer-Guyton-Everett.
This combo will eat.
All this talk about speed.
Fix the RZ offense.
That is all.HowellER KlareTE FarmerOG M'baDT TollisonC 4.3.26
👍 2- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Yep...makes sense...unless you just wanna take shots at Staley, because he didnt win us a SB in his second year, and he isnt Sean Payton...then its just crazy talk.:lol:Originally posted by Xenos View Post
Popper brought up the week before that he believed Reich was the exception and the #1 choice hire for OC because of his credentials and experience as a play caller. Otherwise, they were going with someone from the Shanahan/McVay tree because that’s the scheme that Staley believed in. Moore represents an OC whose qualifications was good enough that Staley looked past the fact that he ran a “different” scheme. Similar to the Reich scenario. Does that make sense?2026 Post combine Sig Mock 2.0
1. Blake Miller G/T Clemson
2. Gabe Jacas Edge Illinois
3. Jalon Kilgore DB South Carolina
4. Zane Durant DT Penn State
6. Jager Burton G/C Kentucky

👍 2- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
We were 13th best scoring offense in '22, with Herbert. With a backup starting? Hopefully we see some change in depth.Originally posted by beachcomber View Postpersonally suspect, and per usual, that it was a Spanos driven hire....
and not so sure this guy is any huge upgrade from Lombardi, who had us as a top five O @one point, and had to deal w/receivers (minus Keenan) who couldn't separate and a patchwork/fledgling Oline.
hopefully Moore keeps us as a top five O, and.... prolly gonna be a lot more dependent on Herbert's return to health and the availability of our "playmakers"
without Dak, Moore's O was 19th.... it's still on team Tommy John and Stalesco to bring things up to speed, and.... do think we're likely to get back up to 12 wins this season.... it's still about personnel and health.... two things, for the most part, out of Kellen's jurisdiction.
Mainly we need improved run production (30th) , red zone and scoring with Herbert.
👍 1- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Yes, it does to me.Originally posted by Xenos View Post
Popper brought up the week before that he believed Reich was the exception and the #1 choice hire for OC because of his credentials and experience as a play caller. Otherwise, they were going with someone from the Shanahan/McVay tree because that’s the scheme that Staley believed in. Moore represents an OC whose qualifications was good enough that Staley looked past the fact that he ran a “different” scheme. Similar to the Reich scenario. Does that make sense?
👍 1- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Norv turner and al saunders, come to mind but…Originally posted by charger1_sj View Post
FYI, going by memory we have never promoted someone on our staff to HC. The opportunity to do so, especially during Telesco's time has been there."The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
If you read that piece I linked earlier in the thread that was how they described Moore hsitorically. Someone who changed the attack week to week based on the defense they were facing. Of course, that depends on being able to do different things equally well.Originally posted by wu-dai clan View Post
Staley's offensive vision is but a part of Moore's offense.
It will literally change on a week by week basis.
Think in terms of the midnite buffet on a luxury cruise liner.
Screens, motion, intricate "inter-weaving route concepts" are involved.
Slayer-MW-Palmer-Guyton-Everett.
This combo will eat.
All this talk about speed.
Fix the RZ offense.
That is all.
👍 3- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I asked this question in the previous page but I’m not sure where people are getting the idea that this is a Spanos move. Throughout their history they’ve been hands off when it comes to what the GM and HC wants to do. With the HC, it’s still his decision who he wants on his staff. Otherwise for example they would have forced Lynn to fire George Stewart a long time ago as ST coach. This was all Staley. Just like Ficken was his last name offseason.Originally posted by Fouts2herbert View Post
I like the Moore hire, it’s probably one of the smartest moves the Spanos have made in a good long while…as for that being a rant? Considering what I’ve read on these forums I’m not certain that even qualifies…sure I’m out on staley, and I’m also out on bosa, and I’m probably still not over jax, but this hire is definitely a step in the right direction and the only thing giving me a sliver of hope for 2023 and the future with herbert…IMO this move was all about making sure herbert would want to stay longterm with the chargers on contract extension…
It also pleases me to know that if staley can’t get his defense to play at a much higher level, then the chargers have someone that can take over the reigns going forward…I’m not a gambler but I’d almost be wiling to bet that if things continue the same on defense with staley, moore will likely be the ‘next man up’ to coach the chargers…
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I wish he had a defensive vision too, especially one that included bringing in someone to help him run the defense so he can focus on being the HC…I read somewhere this week a former coach was making a comment on what McCarthy is taking on in dallas by wanting to call plays again, the guy said it literally doubles the time commitment for a head coach double as a coordinator and a head coachOriginally posted by wu-dai clan View Post
Staley's offensive vision is but a part of Moore's offense.
It will literally change on a week by week basis.
Think in terms of the midnite buffet on a luxury cruise liner.
Screens, motion, intricate "inter-weaving route concepts" are involved.
Slayer-MW-Palmer-Guyton-Everett.
This combo will eat.
All this talk about speed.
Fix the RZ offense.
That is all.
"The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
- Top
- Bottom
Comment

Comment