Originally posted by Boltjolt
View Post
The Melvin Gordon Saga - Holdout Over
Collapse
X
-
- Top
- Bottom
-
-
Originally posted by Fleet View Post
Rivers and Henry will be brought back. And Rivers alone is crazy expensive. Better draft a C soon. Is Quessenberry the answer? Unknown. Trevor Williams is developing still has some upside. Its nice to have a #2 CB that didnt cost us anything. Still the market is so high for decent CBs. The bulk of the core hits in 2021 so i agree 2020 was really about Rivers and Henry. Schofield could be a cheap bring back.
I am of the mind that i would replace the bottom 10-15% of my roster annually. I woud factor in experience and upside in that evaluation too.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Panamamike View Post
Rivers and HH are the only 2. pouncey will he too old by then. Williams is ok, but far from irreplaceable. Schofield is serviceable.
I am of the mind that i would replace the bottom 10-15% of my roster annually. I woud factor in experience and upside in that evaluation too.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Panamamike View Post
Qb is the only position i sign high dollar money to post 30. Premium oline player if early 30s and shorter term is ok. The rest? Thanks for your service, but we have decided to move on. Post 30s vets i only sign at a discount to current production mv. The further past 30, the steeper the discount. My .02Now, if you excuse me, I have some Charger memories to suppress.
The Wasted Decade is done.
Build Back Better.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
I would not extend Gordon unless he was willing to give a huge hometown discount, and I don't think he will (nor would I blame him for not). Too many injuries, too many hits and the nagging longevity worry post micro-fracture surgery. He has developed into a very good back, but can be replaced and the premium money he'll likely want could be spent on more needs.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
It's a cold, hard reality for rbs in today's game
they take most of the punishment
therefore have the shortest shelf life
and are flooded every year with cheaper, capable college backs
its arguably the least prosperous position in all of pro sports and I feel for them
wts, I've been consistent with my stance that it would be unwise for the organization to pay MG3 what he deserves.
Not to mention (but I think it's important to) that Lynn is a rb by trade, therefore is reasonable to expect him to compensate by coaching up lesser talented guys thus saving us from having to pay market price for RBsG-Ro knows.
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 21&500 View PostIt's a cold, hard reality for rbs in today's game
they take most of the punishment
therefore have the shortest shelf life
and are flooded every year with cheaper, capable college backs
its arguably the least prosperous position in all of pro sports and I feel for them
wts, I've been consistent with my stance that it would be unwise for the organization to pay MG3 what he deserves.
Not to mention (but I think it's important to) that Lynn is a rb by trade, therefore is reasonable to expect him to compensate by coaching up lesser talented guys thus saving us from having to pay market price for RBs
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sgt. Pepper View PostGood post. Very accurate. Why do RBs take the most punishment? OL and DL smash into each other nearly every play.
Linemen also tend tend to be bigger and their bodies can handle the punishment better than a running back. In general bigger running backs lack the explosion but have better injury history. In today's nfl it feels like the days of The Bus type backs is fading for the flashier more splashy mid to small sized running backs who can hit the home run but will be more likely to be injured.
Thats just my two two cents on it, could be wrong but it seems like the logical reasons.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sgt. Pepper View PostGood post. Very accurate. Why do RBs take the most punishment? OL and DL smash into each other nearly every play.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Budsman View Post
I'm not a doctor but it has to have something to do with the type of hits and their size. So a running back is running full speed and getting slammed by hogs at the line or linebackers. These hits tend to vary in location and can hit knees and ankles with quite a lot of force.
Linemen also tend tend to be bigger and their bodies can handle the punishment better than a running back. In general bigger running backs lack the explosion but have better injury history. In today's nfl it feels like the days of The Bus type backs is fading for the flashier more splashy mid to small sized running backs who can hit the home run but will be more likely to be injured.
Thats just my two two cents on it, could be wrong but it seems like the logical reasons.Originally posted by jamrock View Post
Not at all the same. They aren't smashing into each other with a running start. RB's are going too speed trying to hit the hole and can get leveled. They are also tackled. Lineman arent
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sgt. Pepper View PostGood post. Very accurate. Why do RBs take the most punishment? OL and DL smash into each other nearly every play.Now, if you excuse me, I have some Charger memories to suppress.
The Wasted Decade is done.
Build Back Better.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jamrock View Post
Not at all the same. They aren't smashing into each other with a running start. RB's are going too speed trying to hit the hole and can get leveled. They are also tackled. Lineman arentLife is too short to drink cheap beer :beer:
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment